January
26th
  10:29:23 AM

Marriage is different from cohabitation - Canadian court

imfclogo

 

A press release just in from a MercatorNet partner:

January 25, 2013 (Ottawa) - Today the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that Quebec can exclude cohabiting couples from receiving spousal support in the event of relationship breakdown. 

The Institute of Marriage and Family Canada applauds this decision because it accurately reflects the fact that social science research shows marriage to be substantively different from living common law. 

“There is great consensus from social scientists, no matter their political stripe, that marriage is different from living together,” says IMFC Manager of Research Andrea Mrozek. “Unfortunately, the statistical reality is that people living together break up more readily – even if they do eventually wed. They are more likely to have multiple partners. Their children face more problems – higher rates of school dropout, more drug use and an earlier age of sexual initiation. And single parents – typically mothers – are more likely to be poor. These are some of the harsh statistical realities of living together versus getting married, and it is wise to acknowledge this difference,” says Mrozek. 

Marriage protects against poverty and remains the most stable manner in which to raise children. Some researchers have even identified that a new class division is emerging along married versus unmarried lines. This is the message of author Kay Hymowitz’s book, Marriage and Caste in America

Providing the same benefits to those living common-law and those who are married belies the research, sends the wrong signal about the importance of marriage for our culture and goes against the freedom to choose. People living together generally do so because they do not want to get married, and they should not be told after the fact that they actually are, simply because they lived together for a certain amount of time. 

“As the saying goes, cohabitation is good preparation not for marriage, but for divorce. The Supreme Court of Canada decision today reflects the importance of establishing that marriage is a uniquely positive force for families in our culture,” concludes Mrozek. 



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Humanity amongst the horror of Woolwich attack
25 May 2013
Housewife revival is not such a bad thing
23 May 2013
Declaration of 2013 World Congress of Families
21 May 2013
World Congress of Families 2013
19 May 2013
Rise of the stay-at-home dad
15 May 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

The Boy Scouts cave in
24 May 2013
Under enormous pressure, they have voted to welcome openly gay scouts. What message does the change in policy send young…

A boy’s life with unisex scouts
23 May 2013
The Boy Scouts of America will vote today on whether they will admit homosexual scouts. Will they become the Unisex…

Necessary excuses
23 May 2013
“Comfort women”, carpet bombing, atom bombs, lethal drones and genocide can all be justified by appeals to necessity.

Digital multitasking: scourge or blessing?
22 May 2013
How can we teach students to focus on what they ought to be doing?

Who or what is a “child”?
22 May 2013
Canada's Parliament lacks the courage to take a stand on defining when an unborn child will be protected by the…


 Tags
media, single motherhood, Canada, obesity, immigration, boys, South Africa, fertility, family meals, Africa, violence, United Nations, gender, Barack Obama, family breakdown, work, education, large families, demography, brain, pregnancy, mental health, television, parenting, child safety, parenthood, contraception, internet, character education, anger, polygamy, friendship, celebrities, morality, abortion, video games, United States, fathers, ageing population, family relationships, European Union, gendercide, family values, family economics, economics, parents, girls, prostitution, family structure, same-sex marriage, family policy, youth, education of children, young adult, smacking, child abuse, unemployment, character, media ethics, Spain, internet safety, New Zealand, poverty, happiness, feminism, pornography, child wellbeing, sexual behaviour, child development, social media, teenage pregnancy, psychology, one-child policy, men, abstinence, schools, sex education, daycare, women, adolescence, ageing, dating, self-control, fashion, mothers, emerging adults, adolescents, Australia, birth control, divorce, homeschooling, child obesity, working mothers, child welfare, same-sex parenting, marriage, fatherhood, Sweden, language, National Marriage Project, sleep, commitment, children's health, childcare, baby boomers, social networking, France, technology, AIDS, health, motherhood, gender equality, texting, Facebook, families, family, modesty, HIVAIDS, China, sexualisation of children, child poverty, trafficking, homosexuality, names, cohabitation, adoption, religion, child behaviour, work-life balance, teen pregnancy, UK, suicide, books, research, parental rights, teenagers, children, HomeMakers Project, Hollywood, USA, recession,