February
05th
  2:17:34 PM

Parents should allow kids to fail

fail

A middle school teacher in the US makes a very good point in a piece in The Atlantic magazine about the importance of failures in a child’s life. Jessica Lahey recalls a case of plagiarism in which a student’s mother turned out to be the main culprit. The mother defended her writing a paper -- consisting largely of material lifted from websites -- for her daughter to hand in because daughter had been stressed out, and mother did not want her to get sick or overwhelmed.

In the end, my student received a zero and I made sure she re-wrote the paper. Herself. Sure, I didn't have the authority to discipline the student's mother, but I have done so many times in my dreams.

While I am not sure what the mother gained from the experience, the daughter gained an understanding of consequences, and I gained a war story. I don't even bother with the old reliables anymore: the mother who "helps" a bit too much with the child's math homework, the father who builds the student's science project. Please. Don't waste my time.

Noting that teachers today frequently swap stories about mounting levels of “over-parenting”, Lahey notes that it is not common types of over-protectiveness (a child isn't allowed to go to camp or learn to drive, a parent cuts up a 10 year-old's food or brings separate plates to parties for a 16 year-old because he's a picky eater) that worry her. She reckons children recover from these as they grow up. No, the real problem parents are those who won’t let their kids make mistakes, take responsibility for them and so learn from them.

These are the parents who worry me the most -- parents who won't let their child learn. You see, teachers don't just teach reading, writing, and arithmetic. We teach responsibility, organization, manners, restraint, and foresight. These skills may not get assessed on standardized testing, but as children plot their journey into adulthood, they are, by far, the most important life skills I teach.

I'm not suggesting that parents place blind trust in their children's teachers; I would never do such a thing myself. But children make mistakes, and when they do, it's vital that parents remember that the educational benefits of consequences are a gift, not a dereliction of duty. Year after year, my "best" students -- the ones who are happiest and successful in their lives -- are the students who were allowed to fail, held responsible for missteps, and challenged to be the best people they could be in the face of their mistakes.

It’s good to hear this from a teacher, don’t you think?

 



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Housewife revival is not such a bad thing
23 May 2013
Declaration of 2013 World Congress of Families
21 May 2013
World Congress of Families 2013
19 May 2013
Rise of the stay-at-home dad
15 May 2013
Record proportion of new mothers are college educated
13 May 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

A boy’s life with unisex scouts
23 May 2013
The Boy Scouts of America will vote today on whether they will admit homosexual scouts. Will they become the Unisex…

Digital multitasking: scourge or blessing?
22 May 2013
How can we teach students to focus on what they ought to be doing?

Who or what is a “child”?
22 May 2013
Canada's Parliament lacks the courage to take a stand on defining when an unborn child will be protected by the…

We’re all mad here
21 May 2013
That's the message of the new edition of the bible for American psychiatrists, DSM-5. Diagnostic inflation is about to become…

Jolie’s Choice
20 May 2013
Angelina Jolie's decision to have a double mastectomy made headlines around the world. But is she sending women the right…


 Tags
family economics, trafficking, parenthood, childcare, work, HIVAIDS, HomeMakers Project, family structure, health, emerging adults, birth control, teenage pregnancy, women, cohabitation, family meals, daycare, United Nations, family breakdown, fatherhood, sexual behaviour, recession, morality, commitment, Barack Obama, children's health, Africa, modesty, research, contraception, child welfare, parents, single motherhood, suicide, working mothers, Spain, language, internet, Sweden, families, happiness, youth, family relationships, homeschooling, Australia, Hollywood, character education, psychology, child development, names, unemployment, child abuse, parenting, motherhood, brain, internet safety, family, boys, fashion, dating, National Marriage Project, divorce, mothers, smacking, gender, media, child wellbeing, polygamy, child obesity, fathers, USA, religion, demography, young adult, China, media ethics, Facebook, sleep, marriage, prostitution, adolescents, pornography, parental rights, family values, child behaviour, teenagers, obesity, work-life balance, economics, UK, United States, schools, education, mental health, child safety, video games, New Zealand, social networking, television, men, abstinence, education of children, Canada, gendercide, ageing population, family policy, texting, character, pregnancy, adolescence, sex education, feminism, ageing, books, celebrities, technology, teen pregnancy, same-sex marriage, gender equality, large families, violence, friendship, European Union, children, same-sex parenting, self-control, social media, girls, immigration, South Africa, AIDS, poverty, adoption, one-child policy, anger, child poverty, baby boomers, homosexuality, abortion, France, sexualisation of children, fertility,