May
28th
  1:18:23 PM

Teenage hugging epidemic

Is it an expression of a nurturing concern for the others? Or is the outbreak of hugging amongst teenagers an empty fad that thrives in today’s atmosphere of boundless informality? Whatever is behind it, hugging is hip with teens.

Parents, who grew up in a generation more likely to use the handshake, the low-five or the high-five, are often baffled by the close physical contact. “It’s a wordless custom, from what I’ve observed,” wrote Beth J. Harpaz, the mother of two boys, 11 and 16, and a parenting columnist for The Associated Press, in a new book, “13 Is the New 18.”

But the sight of kids embracing every time they run into their pals is beginning to get on teachers’ nerves. Some schools have banned it; others have imposed a three-second rule. There are concerns about litigation if some of the boy-girl hugging gets out of hand.

“Touching and physical contact is very dangerous territory,” said Noreen Hajinlian, the principal of George G. White School, a junior high school in Hillsdale, N.J., who banned hugging two years ago. “It was needless hugging — they are in the hallways before they go to class. It wasn’t a greeting. It was happening all day.”

But pro-hugging students say it is not a romantic or sexual gesture, simply the “hello” of their generation. “We like to get cozy,” said Katie Dea, an eighth grader at Claire Lilienthal Alternative School in San Francisco. “The high-five is, like, boring.”

Sociologists have different theories about it: childhood play experiences that makes children more co-operative and group oriented; the general tendency for people to touch more -- and display bodies more; the spread of the “gangsta hug” among urban youth.

Some parents find it paradoxical that a generation so steeped in hands-off virtual communication would be so eager to hug.

“Maybe it’s because all these kids do is text and go on Facebook so they don’t even have human contact anymore,” said Dona Eichner, the mother of freshman and junior girls at the high school in Montvale. She added: “I hug people I’m close to. But now you’re hugging people you don’t even know. Hugging used to mean something.”

One student agrees: “It’s like air-kissing. It’s really superficial.” But a teacher thinks it is a good sign that children are inclined to nurture one another. And it can even be done remotely: Facebook applications allowing friends to send hugs have tens of thousands of fans. ~ New York Times, May 28



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
How men contribute to Australian happiness
24 May 2012
Truth or lies: a parenting challenge
23 May 2012
Girl violence and the parent gap
21 May 2012
Ottawa exhibition modified after complaints
17 May 2012
Self-control is the only magic bullet
16 May 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2012 | Apr 2012 | Mar 2012 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Sensing the sacred
25 May 2012
Is there a sense of the sacred that even the non-religious can share?

Could geoengineering save the planet?
25 May 2012
And who is thinking about the ethics of a technological quick fix?

A thought experiment about marriage
24 May 2012
A world in which sexual intimacy could not produce children would never have come up with the idea of marriage.

Australia’s lifeline: its precarious sea lanes
23 May 2012
Large, isolated and rich, Australia needs to cultivate a friendship with the US to survive in an dangerous world.

It’s only natural
22 May 2012
The bitterest debates today in the public square often turn on what is "natural". The Chinese sages had a lot…


 Tags
anger, dating, Australia, morality, abortion, men, work, Canada, Africa, contraception, fathers, adolescence, divorce, fashion, sexual behaviour, fertility, recession, economics, work-life balance, family, Obama, baby boomers, self-control, United States, violence, obesity, teen pregnancy, large families, child behaviour, UK, books, television, Spain, prostitution, Hollywood, family policy, gendercide, unemployment, internet, media, child wellbeing, motherhood, sex education, health, young adult, emerging adults, trafficking, brain, character, family relationships, polygamy, France, AIDS, HIVAIDS, mental health, birth control, marriage, celebrities, religion, research, European Union, child obesity, children's health, children, family structure, working mothers, character education, family economics, feminism, youth, family breakdown, pornography, parenting, China, psychology, abstinence, New Zealand, sexualisation of children, teenagers, family meals, suicide, media ethics, child abuse, parental rights, United Nations, single motherhood, childcare, family values, child welfare, child safety, gender equality, happiness, girls, schools, homosexuality, social networking, one-child policy, commitment, education of children, Sweden, South Africa, gender, immigration, smacking, poverty, cohabitation, adoption, demography, ageing, social media, child development, same-sex marriage, friendship, technology, education, women, video games, fatherhood,