June
04th
  12:48:10 PM

Fighting parents drive teens to drink

The research is clear: adolescents tend to fare better -- academically and behaviourally -- when they live with both biological parents. And that’s a couple of scientists talking. But there is an exception: when their parents frequently argue, young adults are much more likely to binge on alcohol; they also tend to smoke, and their poor school grades are similar to those of peers who don’t have their own mum and dad at home.

The findings, which, at first blush, are disappointing to marriage advocates, come from a study of teenagers in 1,963 households in the US National Survey of Families and Households who were followed up through to their early 30s. Cornell professor Kelly Musick compared those who lived with married parents who often fought, with those living in stepfather or single-mother households.

“Our results clearly illustrate that the advantages of living with two continuously married parents are not shared equally by all children,” said Musick. “Compared with children in low-conflict families, children from high-conflict families are more likely to drop out of school, have poor grades, smoke, binge drink, use marijuana, have early sex, be young and unmarried when they have a child and then experience the breakup of that relationship.” Income and parenting styles did not account for these differences, she added and the timing and sequence of such young adult transitions, are important indicators for success in later life.

Even so, there were advantages in living with married parents. The young people from high-conflict households, compared with stepfather and single-mother families, were significantly less likely to drop out of high school, have early sex and cohabit, and were more likely to attend college. Their big downfall was a marked tendency to binge drink (imitating their parents? or escaping from the bickering at home too often and mixing with the wrong company?) which they did significantly more than kids from single mother homes.

Prof Musick stresses that policy initiatives promoting marriage “need to take account of how variation within marriage relates to child well-being.” Notice that she does NOT say that, because marriage doesn’t invariably bring the best outcomes for kids, it should not be promoted. Remember the opening line: The research is clear…

It is also clear there is a lot of work to be done to support and build up marriages. ~ Newswise, June 2

 



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
How men contribute to Australian happiness
24 May 2012
Truth or lies: a parenting challenge
23 May 2012
Girl violence and the parent gap
21 May 2012
Ottawa exhibition modified after complaints
17 May 2012
Self-control is the only magic bullet
16 May 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2012 | Apr 2012 | Mar 2012 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Sensing the sacred
25 May 2012
Is there a sense of the sacred that even the non-religious can share?

Could geoengineering save the planet?
25 May 2012
And who is thinking about the ethics of a technological quick fix?

A thought experiment about marriage
24 May 2012
A world in which sexual intimacy could not produce children would never have come up with the idea of marriage.

Australia’s lifeline: its precarious sea lanes
23 May 2012
Large, isolated and rich, Australia needs to cultivate a friendship with the US to survive in an dangerous world.

It’s only natural
22 May 2012
The bitterest debates today in the public square often turn on what is "natural". The Chinese sages had a lot…


 Tags
child welfare, emerging adults, sexual behaviour, contraception, child behaviour, pornography, teenagers, schools, men, demography, adoption, poverty, women, childcare, commitment, violence, gendercide, South Africa, China, celebrities, economics, New Zealand, parental rights, abortion, recession, friendship, large families, psychology, education, children's health, child wellbeing, education of children, character education, social networking, suicide, fashion, UK, Obama, Spain, family values, Hollywood, baby boomers, immigration, Canada, unemployment, prostitution, abstinence, child development, work, young adult, mental health, happiness, Africa, self-control, fertility, single motherhood, character, sex education, research, birth control, AIDS, ageing, brain, religion, video games, divorce, teen pregnancy, girls, working mothers, gender, same-sex marriage, media, youth, smacking, fatherhood, marriage, France, internet, Australia, family policy, children, dating, family relationships, polygamy, feminism, European Union, technology, family economics, motherhood, child obesity, family meals, family, child safety, United Nations, parenting, work-life balance, Sweden, HIVAIDS, United States, morality, media ethics, one-child policy, television, homosexuality, obesity, books, sexualisation of children, cohabitation, social media, child abuse, family breakdown, fathers, adolescence, gender equality, anger, family structure, trafficking, health,