September
25th
  10:07:32 AM

China’s stolen babies

Girl babies adopted by American and other overseas couples from orphanages in China in recent years may have been forcibly taken from their parents, not abandoned, as the adoptive parents were told. The Los Angeles Times reports at length on a scandal that can be laid at the door of China’s inhuman population control policy and corrupt local family planning officials.

It seems that many couples in China have been left distraught by what amounts to baby trafficking, and couples who have adopted the babies are left wondering whether their little girl was snatched from a sobbing mother or tricked away from a bewildered father or grandparent.

Since the early 1990s, says the LA Times, more than 80,000 Chinese children have been adopted abroad, the majority to the US. Many, perhaps, were abandoned, but some parents are coming forward to report that they were coerced to give up an unauthorised baby by government officials motivated by the $US3000 per child that adoptive parents pay orphanages.

The Times puts its finger on the basic problem:

The problem is rooted in China's population controls, which limit most families to one child, two if they live in the countryside and the first is a girl. Each town has a family planning office, usually staffed by loyal Communist Party cadres who have broad powers to order abortions and sterilizations. People who have additional babies can be fined up to six times their annual income -- fines euphemistically called "social service expenditures," which are an important source of revenue for local government in rural areas.

Where people are too poor to pay the fine, officials often punish them by ransacking their homes or confiscating cows and pigs. That’s how it was for the residents of Tianxi, a village in the mountains near Zhenyuan, during the 1980s and 1990s.

Then, in 2003, things changed. The year after the Social Welfare Institute in Zhenyuan was approved to participate in the burgeoning foreign adoption program, family planning officials stopped confiscating farm animals. They started taking babies instead.

The villagers, by the way, “resent the suggestion by some that they don't love their daughters and readily abandon them.

"People around here don't dump their kids. They don't sell their kids. Boy or girl, they're our flesh and blood," said Li Zeji, 32, a farmer who says his third daughter was taken in 2004.

In Gaoping, a small town in Hunan province, officials have used family planning laws to confiscate even first-born children on the ground that a couple did not meet all the requirements. These include having a birth permit before conceiving, the woman being at least 20 and the man 24, and having a marriage certificate -- itself dependent on each partner having a proper residency permit.

The officials, of course, deny forcibly taking children:

"It's a lie that they took babies away without their parents' permission. That's impossible," said Peng Qiuping, a party official and propaganda chief for Zhenyuan. "These parents agreed that the children should be put up for adoption. They understood that they were greedy and had more children than they could afford."

"They're better off with their adoptive parents than their birth parents," argued Wu Benhua, director of Zhenyuan's civil affairs bureau.

They claim the money all goes to improve conditions in the orphanages, but the Times could not verify that, noting that “most of the babies had been housed with families who were paid only $30 a month for their services, according to one foster parent.”

Some people blame international adoption itself, saying that the money involved creates the opportunity for abuse. With China there are obviously reasons to be extra careful -- the lack of freedom for a couple to found and raise a family, and the absence of a free press that might thoroughly investigate the whole question of “abandonment” of baby girls.

Since most of those adopted overseas go to the US, it is certainly an issue for the government there to investigate and put the heat on Beijing if necessary.



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Why Sensible, Well-balanced Parents are Superior
10 Feb 2012
Daycare must focus on child, not adult needs, says new report
9 Feb 2012
About gender
7 Feb 2012
More time online = less happiness among girls
6 Feb 2012
Changing the way teens think
3 Feb 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
Feb 2012 | Jan 2012 | Dec 2011 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

How hedonism became America’s official religion
9 Feb 2012
An edict from the Obama administration has ended the American experiment in religious liberty.

Bombs across the border
10 Feb 2012
The US makes a strong case that its military interventions in Pakistan are just and legal. Whether they’re good is…

A parental defence of highly effective nagging
10 Feb 2012
When a deadly habit becomes a useful tool in the parental armoury.

Lost in Transition III: A collective challenge
9 Feb 2012
Who is to blame for the moral ignorance of young adults, and what is to be done?

Pink Lego
8 Feb 2012
Why are feminists throwing their toys out of the cot over a victory for girl power?


 Tags
abortion, young adult, girls, technology, Obama, morality, sexualisation of children, Africa, education of children, gender equality, friendship, fashion, dating, adoption, fatherhood, family relationships, Hollywood, child obesity, adolescence, teenagers, parenting, suicide, motherhood, single motherhood, parental rights, unemployment, cohabitation, divorce, books, working mothers, character education, demography, child development, United Nations, Spain, sexual behaviour, child abuse, work, pornography, birth control, media, Australia, family structure, ageing, religion, health, social networking, work-life balance, same-sex marriage, family values, polygamy, psychology, family economics, abstinence, schools, child wellbeing, France, China, United States, fertility, happiness, contraception, self-control, women, South Africa, baby boomers, internet, social media, AIDS, children's health, marriage, sex education, family, mental health, media ethics, education, fathers, men, youth, gender, immigration, violence, poverty, family policy, recession, child welfare, childcare, smacking, commitment, family meals, television, New Zealand, emerging adults, family breakdown, large families, one-child policy, obesity, trafficking, prostitution, video games, brain, homosexuality, children, child safety, feminism, research,