September
30th
  5:58:46 AM

Working mums have less healthy kids

Last night on New Zealand television the British female lead of the live show Mamma Mia! joked about how she went to work to get away from her four young children -- a firstborn plus triplets who are on tour with her. Great for her, but how are the kids doing?

Research just published in her homeland suggests that the children of working mothers are less healthy and are more likely to have poor dietary habits and a more sedentary lifestyle. They eat less fruit and vegetables, watch more television and consume more crisps and fizzy drink than the children of mothers who stay at home.

This is bad news for British authorities, whose crowded social agenda includes fighting childhood obesity and getting women to return to work. It looks as though the two goals are at loggerheads. Flexible working arrangements for mothers in full-time work seem to make no difference, and children of part-time working mums were still not as healthy as those whose mothers stayed home. Variables such as socio-economic background, single parenthood and household income were taken into account in the results, which are based on 12,000 British children born between 2000 and 2002.

Researchers on the latest paper concluded that with approximately 60 per cent of British women with a child aged 5 or younger in employment, more support was needed. “For many families the only parent or both parents are working. This may limit parents’ capacity to provide their children with healthy foods and opportunities for physical activity,” they said. “Policies and programmes are needed to help support parents and create a health-promoting environment.”

To say nothing of emotional health and character development.

Nobody, of course, is rushing to say that mothers of young children should not go out to work. The authors of the study suggest that the quality if childcare needs looking at; they are not sure whether the link they found was associated with what the kids did while the mother was at work, or with time pressure on parents when they are back in the home -- that is, whether it’s the staff at the daycare centre or the grandparents allowing bad habits, or the parents themselves being too busy and exhausted to insist on good habits.

All the same they hint that there may be something wrong at policy level:

“What policymakers need to understand is that what might be a solution to some issues may create others. There are upsides and downsides.”



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
How men contribute to Australian happiness
24 May 2012
Truth or lies: a parenting challenge
23 May 2012
Girl violence and the parent gap
21 May 2012
Ottawa exhibition modified after complaints
17 May 2012
Self-control is the only magic bullet
16 May 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2012 | Apr 2012 | Mar 2012 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Sensing the sacred
25 May 2012
Is there a sense of the sacred that even the non-religious can share?

Could geoengineering save the planet?
25 May 2012
And who is thinking about the ethics of a technological quick fix?

A thought experiment about marriage
24 May 2012
A world in which sexual intimacy could not produce children would never have come up with the idea of marriage.

Australia’s lifeline: its precarious sea lanes
23 May 2012
Large, isolated and rich, Australia needs to cultivate a friendship with the US to survive in an dangerous world.

It’s only natural
22 May 2012
The bitterest debates today in the public square often turn on what is "natural". The Chinese sages had a lot…


 Tags
Australia, unemployment, demography, media ethics, Canada, brain, United Nations, parenting, baby boomers, child wellbeing, pornography, France, social networking, mental health, media, Sweden, trafficking, religion, marriage, adoption, family relationships, economics, anger, divorce, social media, China, working mothers, men, character education, children, Obama, single motherhood, poverty, family meals, family policy, one-child policy, child development, child behaviour, happiness, feminism, video games, obesity, fathers, European Union, education, morality, abortion, dating, health, emerging adults, AIDS, television, commitment, sex education, sexualisation of children, child obesity, New Zealand, smacking, gender equality, motherhood, girls, HIVAIDS, Spain, sexual behaviour, large families, gender, child safety, family breakdown, work-life balance, young adult, education of children, internet, Hollywood, women, schools, child abuse, UK, parental rights, youth, fatherhood, homosexuality, suicide, children's health, friendship, teenagers, books, work, character, family, technology, birth control, family structure, teen pregnancy, child welfare, fashion, violence, same-sex marriage, contraception, immigration, gendercide, United States, psychology, family economics, recession, ageing, childcare, research, adolescence, abstinence, polygamy, South Africa, family values, fertility, self-control, celebrities, cohabitation, prostitution, Africa,