November
21st
  7:57:53 AM

Wedding cash a turn-off for young Koreans

No wonder South Koreans are marrying late and the country is winning the race to the bottom in the fertility stakes. Their wedding culture alone, labelled “vain and extravagant” by their own president, sounds like a big turn-off.

Western brides and grooms have their gift registers (cash also accepted), but South Korean families expect their guests -- who can run to thousands -- to turn up with a cash-filled envelope to be received by a cashier, who will give them a meal ticket in return. A bank account number is sometimes included in the invitation so people who can’t attend can still send money.

Of course, money is a very practical thing to give newlyweds and many cultures have the custom of giving money for weddings and funerals. But the element of “face” and one-upmanship involved has an inflationary effect that, in Korea at least, can be boosted by political and business bribery.

South Korea’s top financial regulator, Kim Jong-chang, dropped the envelope system from his daughter’s recent wedding. Otherwise, he says, “In my case, many banking officials would have shown up with cash gifts. They would have wondered whether I was annoyed that they didn’t put enough in the envelope.”

Here are some stats:

Every year, the roughly 330,000 South Korean couples who get married spend an average of 15 million to 20 million won, or $13,000 to $17,000, in wedding expenses, said Lee Woong-jin, head of Sunoo, a matchmaking company that conducts an annual survey on wedding expenses. The cost can exceed 50 million won for hotel weddings.

Much of that is covered by the cash gifts. Last year, South Koreans gave out 8 trillion won, or 524,500 won for each household, in cash gifts for weddings and funerals, according to the National Statistical Office.

Friendships and business relationships may hang on keeping a record of how much a family receives so they can reciprocate when it’s their turn to show up at a wedding. And the whole thing is organised by parents rather than the bride and groom. But younger couples are rebelling against what they see as a “commercial” wedding culture.

“Some of my friends feel frustrated, wondering if their wedding is for them or for their parents,” said Lee Eun-jeong, 35, who works at a publishing company in Seoul. She limited her wedding in June to 135 guests and did not accept envelopes. “We also hate it when a friend who hasn’t contacted us for years suddenly gets in touch with us before her wedding, obviously with our envelopes in mind,” she said.

The government is trying to encourage frugality, but it has its work cut out.



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
How men contribute to Australian happiness
24 May 2012
Truth or lies: a parenting challenge
23 May 2012
Girl violence and the parent gap
21 May 2012
Ottawa exhibition modified after complaints
17 May 2012
Self-control is the only magic bullet
16 May 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2012 | Apr 2012 | Mar 2012 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Sensing the sacred
25 May 2012
Is there a sense of the sacred that even the non-religious can share?

Could geoengineering save the planet?
25 May 2012
And who is thinking about the ethics of a technological quick fix?

A thought experiment about marriage
24 May 2012
A world in which sexual intimacy could not produce children would never have come up with the idea of marriage.

Australia’s lifeline: its precarious sea lanes
23 May 2012
Large, isolated and rich, Australia needs to cultivate a friendship with the US to survive in an dangerous world.

It’s only natural
22 May 2012
The bitterest debates today in the public square often turn on what is "natural". The Chinese sages had a lot…


 Tags
books, obesity, family meals, work, video games, poverty, adolescence, character, work-life balance, health, divorce, dating, family breakdown, Obama, marriage, family, gender equality, children's health, trafficking, South Africa, anger, family values, schools, homosexuality, social networking, prostitution, abstinence, pornography, gendercide, fashion, birth control, UK, AIDS, morality, child safety, media ethics, parental rights, fatherhood, men, large families, Canada, commitment, mental health, teenagers, HIVAIDS, youth, teen pregnancy, violence, United Nations, sexualisation of children, gender, family economics, abortion, Africa, parenting, sexual behaviour, ageing, unemployment, television, motherhood, single motherhood, character education, smacking, child welfare, family relationships, Australia, happiness, education of children, France, internet, family policy, childcare, New Zealand, demography, child abuse, polygamy, emerging adults, child behaviour, sex education, child wellbeing, working mothers, fertility, European Union, young adult, self-control, United States, research, Hollywood, religion, fathers, Spain, children, technology, feminism, celebrities, economics, education, one-child policy, friendship, same-sex marriage, child obesity, media, brain, psychology, recession, contraception, Sweden, China, suicide, immigration, women, baby boomers, girls, cohabitation, adoption, social media, family structure, child development,