December
08th
  1:14:00 AM

Children change climate for the better

As the climate change summit opens in Copenhagen, the UN Population Fund’s recent message is still ringing in my ears: more babies will undermine attempts to stop global warming.

This nonsense from the UN is not new: we have heard for some time now that the most climatologically (ergo morally) responsible thing you can do is have fewer children or none at all. I have read countless columns, articles, and comments on blogs and websites blasting large families for increasing their “carbon footprint” and jeopardizing the future of the planet.

My husband I are the proud parents of seven children. This makes us an anomaly in post-modern western culture, where the birth rate has fallen below replacement level. What makes our family slightly more extraordinary is that they are all girls. I am rather proud of this fact, though technically, I’m not sure I had much to do with it.

My girls are lovely, intelligent and talented (but they would possess inherent human dignity even if they were not). They are musically and artistically gifted: I cannot say at this point (the eldest being only twenty-one) whether there is a future composer, performer, filmmaker, or artist in the bunch, but you never know. They perform well academically: could there be a potential teacher, professor, research scientist, doctor amongst them? My daughters are also loving and protective toward one another (sibling squabbles are relatively few) and compassionate towards the downtrodden. They have practical skills: they know how to cook, clean, and change a flat tire. They don’t complain (any more than is normal) about doing household chores: everyone pitches in according to age and ability. They volunteer in the wider community where they have a reputation for being polite, respectful, and hard-working.

I could be accused of bias for saying all of this, but I have heard it from so many people (most of whom are no blood relation) that I must conclude it is true. In short, my girls are contributing to society and making the world a better place. And we know how desperately this world needs to be made better. It has far less to do with recycling plastic soda bottles than with respecting human life and the dignity of the person. Less panic that “the sky is falling”; more joy, faith, hope and love—that is the sort of “climate change” I can believe in.

My daughters are not unique: many children are just as beautiful and talented. All children possess the seeds of potential to be and do great things for humanity. Yes, humanity, not just the environment. I believe in responsible stewardship of the earth, not fanatical earth-worship that demands human sacrifice. It is rather ironic that eco-crusaders dream of a pristine, natural utopia for the earth—to what end? So that a decaying, corrupted civilization such as ours can die a tortuous death surrounded by fluffy bunnies and soft green grass?

Mariette Ulrich is a freelance writer who lives in Saskatchewan, Canada. She also blogs at www.dumboldhousewives.blogspot.com



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Baby name or status symbol?
17 Jun 2013
Still a Life Worth Living
14 Jun 2013
Aussie journalist: “I’m so sorry I didn’t kill you, mum”
12 Jun 2013
Detox your love life
10 Jun 2013
Note well: 30 is not the new 20
5 Jun 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
Jun 2013 | May 2013 | Apr 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Squatters on Europe’s Christian heritage
19 Jun 2013
Can human dignity find a firm foundation in secularism?

Networks of responsibility: the Philadelphia building collapse
18 Jun 2013
Who should ultimately take the blame in a tragedy of careless demolition which caused six deaths?

“Man of Steel”
18 Jun 2013
Finally we have an excellent adaptation of everyone's favourite comic book hero.

What really happens to women who have abortions?
18 Jun 2013
Once again, the New York Times ignores the evidence and backs supporters of abortion.

“But if I am only for myself, what am I?”
17 Jun 2013
Canadian columnist Barbara Kay reflects on her upbringing and the issues that have made her a major controversialist.


 Tags
brain, parenthood, self-control, parents, video games, sexualisation of children, sleep, Australia, unemployment, adolescents, baby boomers, social networking, psychology, adoption, child welfare, emerging adults, trafficking, family meals, economics, morality, families, abortion, internet, pregnancy, ageing, large families, sex education, France, divorce, daycare, recession, television, obesity, same-sex marriage, parental rights, working mothers, health, violence, childcare, family, HomeMakers Project, ageing population, Canada, same-sex parenting, family policy, character education, abstinence, prostitution, work-life balance, Spain, fathers, feminism, family economics, one-child policy, mothers, USA, South Africa, technology, poverty, suicide, education, friendship, Africa, girls, China, boys, youth, adolescence, family relationships, dating, media ethics, pornography, gender, fertility, gender equality, child abuse, commitment, religion, language, child obesity, books, cohabitation, celebrities, New Zealand, family structure, mental health, United Nations, research, names, happiness, HIVAIDS, internet safety, child safety, smacking, women, marriage, child behaviour, demography, homosexuality, texting, children, child development, UK, birth control, family values, teenage pregnancy, media, National Marriage Project, character, European Union, education of children, Sweden, family breakdown, work, polygamy, sexual behaviour, AIDS, homeschooling, child wellbeing, teen pregnancy, men, Facebook, fatherhood, single motherhood, young adult, schools, United States, Hollywood, modesty, social media, immigration, anger, gendercide, contraception, fashion, parenting, HPV, motherhood, children's health, employment, teenagers, child poverty, Barack Obama,