July
02nd
  9:14:40 AM

Commitment, anyone?

Photo: USA TodayFurther to an earlier post on delayed adulthood, USA Today recently ran a report headed “Dating for a decade?” on how young adults put off the commitment of marriage for years, even though they have “paired off” and typically live together. Nobody seems very upset about it.

European royals set a poor example: England’s Prince William and Kate Middleton are in their ninth year together; Sweden’s Crown Princess Victoria, 32, has just married her beau of eight years.

For a complete contrast, the paper cites the whirlwind courtship of Lyndon Johnson and Lady Bird, who met in August 1934. He proposed to her on their first date, they were engaged in October and married in November -- and stayed married.

Prolonged education, job hunting and the desire to start marriage from a financially strong position partly explain the delay, but the general acceptance of uncommitted sex explains a lot more. Fear of commitment -- and of divorce -- plays a part, as also romantic ideas about finding the perfect match, a soul-mate. Dating is open-ended, options are kept open.

Many, of course, cohabit more than once while others break up and come together again up to several times. Maybe they hope they will get their divorces over before marrying.

The pattern is unlikely to change, says sociologist Andrew Cherlin, unless Americans (or Europeans or Australians) want more children than they are having.

"If all you want is one or two kids, you can wait until your 30s to get married," he says. "We may in the future look more like France and the Scandinavian countries, where many couples live together a long time before marrying. And a lot of them have kids."

Those countries also have very burdensome social welfare systems.

The overview of modern relationships ends with a couple (28 and 30) planning their marriage -- but not children.

There are some odd little sidelines to this report -- links to stories about how “Living together has little effect on marriage success” and “Divorce may not cause kids’ bad behaviour” -- not the sort of thing we have been hearing from researchers on the whole.

There are no grounds for reassurance in this tale of commitment withheld, rather, reasons for getting a different message through to young people.



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
How men contribute to Australian happiness
24 May 2012
Truth or lies: a parenting challenge
23 May 2012
Girl violence and the parent gap
21 May 2012
Ottawa exhibition modified after complaints
17 May 2012
Self-control is the only magic bullet
16 May 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2012 | Apr 2012 | Mar 2012 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Sensing the sacred
25 May 2012
Is there a sense of the sacred that even the non-religious can share?

Could geoengineering save the planet?
25 May 2012
And who is thinking about the ethics of a technological quick fix?

A thought experiment about marriage
24 May 2012
A world in which sexual intimacy could not produce children would never have come up with the idea of marriage.

Australia’s lifeline: its precarious sea lanes
23 May 2012
Large, isolated and rich, Australia needs to cultivate a friendship with the US to survive in an dangerous world.

It’s only natural
22 May 2012
The bitterest debates today in the public square often turn on what is "natural". The Chinese sages had a lot…


 Tags
child safety, sexualisation of children, morality, child development, family structure, youth, abortion, cohabitation, work, fashion, child behaviour, girls, economics, Canada, video games, social networking, fertility, family policy, men, adoption, sexual behaviour, recession, same-sex marriage, family economics, happiness, health, baby boomers, prostitution, education of children, motherhood, France, UK, books, technology, internet, child abuse, television, single motherhood, family, Sweden, family values, Spain, United Nations, Obama, gendercide, social media, marriage, self-control, China, child obesity, children, character, childcare, women, working mothers, large families, parental rights, suicide, media, ageing, family relationships, fatherhood, child welfare, South Africa, immigration, anger, schools, children's health, dating, young adult, trafficking, teenagers, parenting, research, AIDS, unemployment, poverty, child wellbeing, European Union, one-child policy, birth control, homosexuality, fathers, teen pregnancy, violence, divorce, pornography, celebrities, gender, United States, contraception, abstinence, character education, friendship, gender equality, commitment, demography, New Zealand, family meals, religion, education, sex education, media ethics, polygamy, mental health, obesity, Hollywood, emerging adults, work-life balance, adolescence, brain, psychology, HIVAIDS, Africa, feminism, family breakdown, Australia, smacking,