August
16th
  10:58:07 AM

Serial marriages linked with earlier death

While increasing numbers of people find it difficult -- or unimportant -- to achieve marriage, there are others who marry more than once. A third marriage, however, may signpost an early grave.

In general, married people enjoy better health than those who are divorced or unmarried. But a study of 9000 people born between 1931 and 1941 shows that people who had married at least three times were 34 per cent more likely to die at any given time after the age of 50 than those who had married once.

The Daily Mail (which jumped on a story that provided an opportunity to show pictures of much-married film star Tom Cruise and his wives -- and we have followed suit) reports:

It isn’t entirely clear why. But it may be related to the stress of break-ups, divorces or the death of a spouse.

It is also possible that those who fail to take care of their marriage also fail to take care of their health.

For instance, those with multiple marriages were also more likely to smoke. It might be that the stress of the break-up led them to take up smoking, or that those in a stable marriage are more likely to quit.

Researcher John Henretta, of the University of Florida in Gainesville, said: ‘Some personality characteristic, for example conscientiousness, might lead someone to be a better spouse and engage in positive health behaviours.’

Looking around for more information I came across a report by Statistics Canada based on a 2001 social survey. That data showed that people who had married three times (hardly any had married more) represented less than 1 per cent of the ever-married population aged 25 and over. Socio-demographically there was “nothing much” to distinguish them from other married Canadians. It seemed to come down to personality and behaviour factors again. Also:

A 1990 U.S. study specifically of serial marriers agreed that both men and women married multiple times have higher levels of anxiety than those married only once or twice; multiply-married women also reported more psychological distress than other married women, even after controlling for their divorce history.

Counter-intuitively:

Serial marriers are significantly less likely to claim that being married is important or very important to their happiness, at 69% versus 82% of people who married only once (including those divorced or widowed as well as those still married)…

But, predictably:

Similarly, serial marriers are almost twice as likely to say they would not stay in a bad marriage even for the sake of their children (50% compared with 28% of once-marrieds)…

There is some very interesting material about marriage in the Canadian report, even though the data are a few years old.



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
How men contribute to Australian happiness
24 May 2012
Truth or lies: a parenting challenge
23 May 2012
Girl violence and the parent gap
21 May 2012
Ottawa exhibition modified after complaints
17 May 2012
Self-control is the only magic bullet
16 May 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2012 | Apr 2012 | Mar 2012 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Sensing the sacred
25 May 2012
Is there a sense of the sacred that even the non-religious can share?

Could geoengineering save the planet?
25 May 2012
And who is thinking about the ethics of a technological quick fix?

A thought experiment about marriage
24 May 2012
A world in which sexual intimacy could not produce children would never have come up with the idea of marriage.

Australia’s lifeline: its precarious sea lanes
23 May 2012
Large, isolated and rich, Australia needs to cultivate a friendship with the US to survive in an dangerous world.

It’s only natural
22 May 2012
The bitterest debates today in the public square often turn on what is "natural". The Chinese sages had a lot…


 Tags
schools, health, polygamy, pornography, Obama, fatherhood, teenagers, child safety, contraception, young adult, family breakdown, abstinence, education of children, brain, parenting, suicide, feminism, parental rights, social networking, self-control, working mothers, child welfare, gender equality, one-child policy, motherhood, ageing, commitment, children's health, China, women, unemployment, violence, UK, Sweden, teen pregnancy, economics, sexual behaviour, immigration, character, New Zealand, technology, gender, child development, girls, character education, Spain, Africa, research, religion, prostitution, celebrities, poverty, morality, cohabitation, family economics, HIVAIDS, recession, fashion, media, friendship, family structure, child abuse, Canada, gendercide, homosexuality, sexualisation of children, media ethics, child behaviour, children, education, youth, mental health, sex education, smacking, abortion, work-life balance, France, adoption, European Union, childcare, books, work, large families, social media, fertility, Hollywood, AIDS, marriage, demography, men, family meals, adolescence, family policy, child wellbeing, anger, obesity, South Africa, Australia, trafficking, happiness, same-sex marriage, family relationships, family, single motherhood, video games, child obesity, television, dating, United States, psychology, divorce, baby boomers, fathers, family values, birth control, United Nations, emerging adults, internet,