September
06th
  10:50:38 AM

And you thought ‘second cousin’ was difficult…

Remember the old riddle: Brothers and sisters have I none... But that man's father is my father's son. Who is that man? -- Well, the answer to that is easy compared with learning the names for one’s extended family in some languages.

And what does it all signify? asks The Economist’s language blogger, “Johnson”, after comparing English with Spanish and Russian -- and, in passing, Hebrew and Arabic.

Going, as usual, on the languages I know something of, in English every child of any of your parents' siblings is your cousin. But in European languages there are usually two ways to say cousin—male and female. In Hebrew there are four, since you also have to specify whether it's your aunt's or uncle's child. In Arabic, eight, because you also have to specify whether it's on your father's or mother's side. Russian has a host of terms, some of them archaic, not only for all some of these, but also for distinguishing a great uncle based on whether he's older or younger than your grandparent, or your niece or nephew depending on whether it's your sister's or brother's child. (Correction by the author.)

He goes on to note the multiplicity of names for in-laws in Spanish compared to English, both of which are outclassed by Russian, which distinguishes your spouse’s siblings and siblings’ spouses, depending on whether they are your wife’s or your husband’s siblings. Russians also have different names for a wife’s parents and husband’s parents, for the spouses of your aunts and uncles, for the parents of your children’s spouses…

Johnson guesses that this specialisation indicates that family concepts are very old. But why do they differ so much from one society to another, even within Europe? Do they tell us something about the structure of particular societies -- Spanish, as opposed to English, for example?

It will be interesting to see if any linguists can help him out.

Here is my guess. Extended family relationships are more important in pre-industrial societies where people are less mobile and where livelihood depends on inheritance (of land, especially) to a large extent. In such communities, which persisted longer in Spain and Russia than in England, with its early industrialisation, it would be necessary to identify all lines of inheritance, as well as degrees of consanguinity when considering marriage. Maybe English has shed some of these terms over the centuries…

PS -- If you don’t get the riddle, just ask below. Someone will certainly help out.



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
How men contribute to Australian happiness
24 May 2012
Truth or lies: a parenting challenge
23 May 2012
Girl violence and the parent gap
21 May 2012
Ottawa exhibition modified after complaints
17 May 2012
Self-control is the only magic bullet
16 May 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2012 | Apr 2012 | Mar 2012 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Sensing the sacred
25 May 2012
Is there a sense of the sacred that even the non-religious can share?

Could geoengineering save the planet?
25 May 2012
And who is thinking about the ethics of a technological quick fix?

A thought experiment about marriage
24 May 2012
A world in which sexual intimacy could not produce children would never have come up with the idea of marriage.

Australia’s lifeline: its precarious sea lanes
23 May 2012
Large, isolated and rich, Australia needs to cultivate a friendship with the US to survive in an dangerous world.

It’s only natural
22 May 2012
The bitterest debates today in the public square often turn on what is "natural". The Chinese sages had a lot…


 Tags
ageing, family, video games, child wellbeing, education of children, cohabitation, family structure, social networking, sexualisation of children, family economics, child obesity, character, demography, prostitution, baby boomers, same-sex marriage, media, children's health, homosexuality, childcare, fathers, family meals, anger, teen pregnancy, young adult, child welfare, large families, obesity, brain, Hollywood, immigration, Sweden, children, China, abstinence, Spain, sex education, family policy, Canada, health, polygamy, dating, feminism, television, child development, celebrities, contraception, girls, divorce, research, smacking, parental rights, economics, self-control, family relationships, gender equality, family breakdown, suicide, work-life balance, books, gendercide, psychology, child behaviour, child safety, parenting, work, one-child policy, fertility, emerging adults, France, social media, United Nations, abortion, trafficking, AIDS, men, single motherhood, UK, violence, pornography, motherhood, adolescence, New Zealand, adoption, education, Australia, schools, character education, Africa, poverty, birth control, European Union, morality, United States, child abuse, youth, fashion, religion, friendship, mental health, unemployment, women, fatherhood, technology, teenagers, South Africa, media ethics, HIVAIDS, Obama, commitment, marriage, happiness, sexual behaviour, recession, gender, working mothers, internet, family values,