March
30th
  6:33:34 PM

Baby Joseph comes home

 

Update on ‘Baby Joseph’

Joseph Maraachli, dubbed “Baby Joseph” by the media, is making a good recovery after receiving a tracheotomy at SSM Cardinal Glennon Children’s Hospital in St. Louis, Missouri. (from eCanadaNow)

The procedure was performed as an important first step in transitioning the 1-year-old to a nursing facility, before allowing him to return home to Windsor, Ontario with his parents, Moe and Sana Maraachli, for his final days. He is scheduled to have the tube changed in the coming week.

Baby Joseph first made news earlier this month when a Canadian hospital denied treatment, and decided to remove the infant’s breathing tube.

The child suffers from Leigh Syndrome, a rare genetic neurometabolic disorder, and had been at the hospital in London, Ontario since October 2010.

Doctors at the [Ontario] hospital had determined that due to the low prognosis of recovering from the deteriorating condition, he did not warrant further treatment.

Pardon my cynicism, but I think perhaps it had more to do with the high cost of his treatment. And possibly that heady feeling you get when, backed by the legal system, you hold not only the power of life and death in your hands, but the ability to thwart the wishes of anyone with the audacity to question your judgment. There’s an old joke about doctors, but it could just as easily be applied to “health care” bureaucrats, judges and lawyers: What’s the difference between God and a doctor? Answer: God knows he’s not a doctor.

The Maraachli family now hopes to take Joseph home to die in peace and privacy. One hesitates to call it a happy ending; how can you when you’re talking about a terminally ill infant? But the family is satisfied with the situation as it currently stands.

Moe Maraachli, Joseph’s father, said in response to this week’s events: “It’s a miracle. My son now has freedom. I’m very happy. My wife and I will respect the second opinion from the hospital in St. Louis. We will accept it with all my heart because Joseph got his human right to get a chance to get a second opinion. When God wants to take his life He’ll take it and nobody can say ‘No’ to God.”

Well, one hospital board in Ontario gave it their best shot.



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Baby name or status symbol?
17 Jun 2013
Still a Life Worth Living
14 Jun 2013
Aussie journalist: “I’m so sorry I didn’t kill you, mum”
12 Jun 2013
Detox your love life
10 Jun 2013
Note well: 30 is not the new 20
5 Jun 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
Jun 2013 | May 2013 | Apr 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

“Man of Steel”
18 Jun 2013
Finally we have an excellent adaptation of everyone's favourite comic book hero.

Networks of responsibility: the Philadelphia building collapse
18 Jun 2013
Who should ultimately take the blame in a tragedy of careless demolition which caused six deaths?

What really happens to women who have abortions?
18 Jun 2013
Once again, the New York Times ignores the evidence and backs supporters of abortion.

“But if I am only for myself, what am I?”
17 Jun 2013
Canadian columnist Barbara Kay reflects on her upbringing and the issues that have made her a major controversialist.

An Esther moment
14 Jun 2013
In the 60th year of her reign, Queen Elizabeth II will soon be asked to give royal assent to same-sex…


 Tags
internet, media, suicide, divorce, parental rights, anger, technology, gender, children, large families, sexual behaviour, prostitution, trafficking, Hollywood, boys, pornography, child behaviour, HPV, social media, France, social networking, recession, parenting, baby boomers, schools, child welfare, ageing population, girls, economics, Barack Obama, families, homeschooling, birth control, family structure, Spain, research, New Zealand, texting, daycare, commitment, abstinence, teenagers, one-child policy, sexualisation of children, child safety, work-life balance, Sweden, Australia, health, parenthood, polygamy, character, same-sex marriage, adolescents, motherhood, Canada, immigration, fashion, violence, United Nations, child development, childcare, sleep, names, family, demography, religion, adolescence, character education, cohabitation, National Marriage Project, unemployment, emerging adults, happiness, family economics, parents, books, young adult, China, internet safety, fatherhood, sex education, child poverty, feminism, family policy, working mothers, gendercide, family values, HomeMakers Project, youth, television, HIVAIDS, UK, mothers, family meals, celebrities, same-sex parenting, Facebook, child wellbeing, friendship, Africa, European Union, video games, marriage, poverty, smacking, child abuse, pregnancy, media ethics, modesty, contraception, dating, teenage pregnancy, morality, AIDS, children's health, United States, employment, abortion, work, ageing, gender equality, family breakdown, self-control, men, teen pregnancy, mental health, women, education of children, brain, education, fathers, child obesity, homosexuality, psychology, USA, South Africa, family relationships, language, single motherhood, fertility, adoption, obesity,