April
30th
  12:06:11 PM

Royal wedding: sleepless in Canada

Silly me, I finally weakened, got my pillow and blanket and camped on my sofa last night to watch Prince William wed his Kate. It was 1 am in my part of Canada. I dozed on and off during the preliminaries (some of the Canadian networks had a THREE hour long lead-up show, and if you think it's impossible to fill three hours of unscripted air time with anything approaching intelligence, you're correct!)

I did indeed enjoy the wedding ceremony, though I watched only up until the vows were complete. I was too tired to continue after that -- though my 17-year-old woke up after I went to bed, and watched the rest. As it is, I shall have to watch the post-nuptial wildly cheering crowds and balcony kiss in reruns and news reports. Or on YouTube. How things have changed since 1981.

Yes, it was worth the lost sleep: it was a wedding, a celebration of love and commitment; it was in the context of a religious ceremony (had to wonder what Sir Elton and his "husband" thought when hearing the Dean of Westminster Abbey pronounce the reasons for God instituting matrimony: 1. For the begetting, not “getting” of children...). When the Archbishop wrapped the couple's hands in a stole I found myself praying that this starry eyed young couple would be able (unlike so many of the wedded royals that preceded them in previous decades) to fulfil the words he was pronouncing at the time: "What God has joined, let no man put asunder..."

As to the cost, even though the state surely had to pay some expenses (security etc) it was also noted on TV that the royal family and the Middletons were "footing the bill" for the wedding. It was simpler than Charles’ and Diana’s ceremony, and gives a boost to the British economy as well as British morale (can't put a price on that).

It did my heart good to see all those Union Jacks waving, and to see so many Brits wildly cheering their Queen as she made her way to the church. Yes, not "the" queen; their queen. I'm no ardent royalist either, but I've been a bit sick of late hearing radical imams declaring that England is a Muslim state and it's only a matter of time before they hand the whole thing over to Allah and shariah law. I think at this point many Brits would beg to differ. How sad that at such a joyous time, one had to worry about the possibility of disruptions and/or terrorist attacks. Kudos to the police and British Intelligence for keeping everything flowing smoothly.

It was billed as "the wedding of the century", which made me a tiny bit cynical: come on, guys, isn't that claim a little premature? There are 89 years remaining in this one, after all. But perhaps it was the wedding to kick off the century. If it means keeping alive the nobler elements of the England we knew in the good old days, long live the Queen.



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Housewife revival is not such a bad thing
23 May 2013
Declaration of 2013 World Congress of Families
21 May 2013
World Congress of Families 2013
19 May 2013
Rise of the stay-at-home dad
15 May 2013
Record proportion of new mothers are college educated
13 May 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

A boy’s life with unisex scouts
23 May 2013
The Boy Scouts of America will vote today on whether they will admit homosexual scouts. Will they become the Unisex…

Digital multitasking: scourge or blessing?
22 May 2013
How can we teach students to focus on what they ought to be doing?

Who or what is a “child”?
22 May 2013
Canada's Parliament lacks the courage to take a stand on defining when an unborn child will be protected by the…

We’re all mad here
21 May 2013
That's the message of the new edition of the bible for American psychiatrists, DSM-5. Diagnostic inflation is about to become…

Jolie’s Choice
20 May 2013
Angelina Jolie's decision to have a double mastectomy made headlines around the world. But is she sending women the right…


 Tags
homosexuality, South Africa, education of children, United States, birth control, family, psychology, unemployment, Sweden, daycare, gender, fertility, China, work-life balance, men, pregnancy, marriage, suicide, media, youth, fatherhood, demography, health, adoption, child safety, abortion, parenting, teenage pregnancy, USA, divorce, feminism, France, internet, economics, sex education, character, family structure, polygamy, modesty, Barack Obama, Africa, National Marriage Project, self-control, social networking, social media, child development, parenthood, language, commitment, women, families, family economics, emerging adults, sexual behaviour, gendercide, friendship, religion, parents, family values, fashion, violence, contraception, children, abstinence, trafficking, single motherhood, same-sex parenting, anger, child behaviour, happiness, Facebook, Hollywood, Spain, internet safety, adolescents, morality, United Nations, Australia, boys, sleep, books, teenagers, HIVAIDS, child obesity, adolescence, ageing, family breakdown, immigration, pornography, childcare, girls, education, mental health, schools, child welfare, child poverty, character education, Canada, prostitution, child wellbeing, family meals, television, sexualisation of children, celebrities, mothers, New Zealand, teen pregnancy, one-child policy, obesity, names, motherhood, UK, homeschooling, family relationships, fathers, poverty, media ethics, gender equality, child abuse, working mothers, AIDS, family policy, smacking, large families, same-sex marriage, European Union, brain, recession, work, HomeMakers Project, texting, video games, children's health, technology, parental rights, baby boomers, cohabitation, ageing population, young adult, research, dating,