May
04th
  9:02:27 PM

More family meals, less obesity

Family dinners star again in a study of childhood obesity. Children who sit down to eat with their parents at least three times a week were 12 per cent less likely to be overweight, American researchers found.

The youngsters were also 20 per cent less likely to eat junk food, 35 per cent less likely to have eating problems like skipping meals or bingeing, and 24 per cent more likely to eat vegetables and other healthy foods. The findings come from a review of 17 studies that were based on observations not actual experiments, so the evidence is suggestive rather than conclusive. Still, it makes sense.

[Researcher] Professor Hammons said it's possible that parents may influence and monitor their kids more during shared meals. 'We also know that families that sit down together are less likely to eat high-calorie food,' she added.

As a result, the researchers encourage families to spend more time together around the dinner table. 'It doesn't have to be every day,' Professor Hammons said. 'We know that families are very busy.'

But maybe that’s conceding too much. Certainly families should aim at more than three times a week.

*****

Another obesity study (of Hispanic parents and children in West Texas) has found that children with TVs in their bedrooms were more likely to be overweight.

On average, the whole group of children, aged 5 to 9, watched more than the recommended maximum of two hours a day: those with TV in their bedroom 3.5 hours a day and the others nearly three hours.

“Bedroom TVs lead to more screen time, sedentary behavior, less parental support of physical activity and increased fast food intake,” said Du Feng, Ph.D., lead study author.

“Seventy percent of the children had a TV in their bedroom, and 32 percent were already overweight or they were at risk for becoming overweight due to unhealthy behaviors,” Feng said.

Another specialist comments:

“You wouldn’t allow a stranger to sit alone with your child in their bedroom and to try to sell them things, would you?” said Dipesh Navsaria, M.D., a professor of pediatrics at University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Besides greater exposure to advertising, TV in the bedroom can also lead to sleep disruption -- a child waking up during the night may turn it on and so lose more sleep, which is another risk for obesity.

Parents often go against their better judgement in allowing a TV in a child’s room, says Prof Navsaria, so family health education is important.

“I have seen multiple times when a parent felt that a TV in a child’s bedroom was not a good idea, but they didn’t feel empowered to remove it unless and until I told them it was important they do so,” he said.

Parents clearly need more support.



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
How men contribute to Australian happiness
24 May 2012
Truth or lies: a parenting challenge
23 May 2012
Girl violence and the parent gap
21 May 2012
Ottawa exhibition modified after complaints
17 May 2012
Self-control is the only magic bullet
16 May 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2012 | Apr 2012 | Mar 2012 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Sensing the sacred
25 May 2012
Is there a sense of the sacred that even the non-religious can share?

Could geoengineering save the planet?
25 May 2012
And who is thinking about the ethics of a technological quick fix?

A thought experiment about marriage
24 May 2012
A world in which sexual intimacy could not produce children would never have come up with the idea of marriage.

Australia’s lifeline: its precarious sea lanes
23 May 2012
Large, isolated and rich, Australia needs to cultivate a friendship with the US to survive in an dangerous world.

It’s only natural
22 May 2012
The bitterest debates today in the public square often turn on what is "natural". The Chinese sages had a lot…


 Tags
research, family relationships, men, immigration, Spain, poverty, family economics, anger, same-sex marriage, family values, video games, child welfare, books, teenagers, child behaviour, AIDS, gender equality, happiness, China, girls, sexualisation of children, demography, schools, family, United States, television, sex education, fathers, self-control, UK, women, work, gender, childcare, Hollywood, obesity, media ethics, homosexuality, child safety, sexual behaviour, prostitution, social networking, smacking, Australia, internet, fertility, youth, education of children, dating, family meals, parental rights, violence, children's health, large families, abstinence, family structure, child abuse, education, child obesity, trafficking, adolescence, children, recession, European Union, pornography, economics, cohabitation, Sweden, working mothers, birth control, morality, abortion, child development, feminism, character education, contraception, fatherhood, health, Canada, France, ageing, Africa, friendship, teen pregnancy, work-life balance, social media, gendercide, unemployment, Obama, polygamy, psychology, child wellbeing, United Nations, marriage, commitment, emerging adults, family policy, motherhood, fashion, HIVAIDS, religion, South Africa, media, suicide, one-child policy, character, young adult, divorce, family breakdown, celebrities, baby boomers, parenting, New Zealand, technology, adoption, single motherhood, mental health, brain,