May
04th
  9:02:27 PM

More family meals, less obesity

Family dinners star again in a study of childhood obesity. Children who sit down to eat with their parents at least three times a week were 12 per cent less likely to be overweight, American researchers found.

The youngsters were also 20 per cent less likely to eat junk food, 35 per cent less likely to have eating problems like skipping meals or bingeing, and 24 per cent more likely to eat vegetables and other healthy foods. The findings come from a review of 17 studies that were based on observations not actual experiments, so the evidence is suggestive rather than conclusive. Still, it makes sense.

[Researcher] Professor Hammons said it's possible that parents may influence and monitor their kids more during shared meals. 'We also know that families that sit down together are less likely to eat high-calorie food,' she added.

As a result, the researchers encourage families to spend more time together around the dinner table. 'It doesn't have to be every day,' Professor Hammons said. 'We know that families are very busy.'

But maybe that’s conceding too much. Certainly families should aim at more than three times a week.

*****

Another obesity study (of Hispanic parents and children in West Texas) has found that children with TVs in their bedrooms were more likely to be overweight.

On average, the whole group of children, aged 5 to 9, watched more than the recommended maximum of two hours a day: those with TV in their bedroom 3.5 hours a day and the others nearly three hours.

“Bedroom TVs lead to more screen time, sedentary behavior, less parental support of physical activity and increased fast food intake,” said Du Feng, Ph.D., lead study author.

“Seventy percent of the children had a TV in their bedroom, and 32 percent were already overweight or they were at risk for becoming overweight due to unhealthy behaviors,” Feng said.

Another specialist comments:

“You wouldn’t allow a stranger to sit alone with your child in their bedroom and to try to sell them things, would you?” said Dipesh Navsaria, M.D., a professor of pediatrics at University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Besides greater exposure to advertising, TV in the bedroom can also lead to sleep disruption -- a child waking up during the night may turn it on and so lose more sleep, which is another risk for obesity.

Parents often go against their better judgement in allowing a TV in a child’s room, says Prof Navsaria, so family health education is important.

“I have seen multiple times when a parent felt that a TV in a child’s bedroom was not a good idea, but they didn’t feel empowered to remove it unless and until I told them it was important they do so,” he said.

Parents clearly need more support.



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Will Big Government save us from Big Appetites?
22 Feb 2012
How modesty is unremarkable
18 Feb 2012
Handgun daddy
17 Feb 2012
Same old, same old from WHO
17 Feb 2012
What’s wrong with Obama’s birth control mandate in 12 concise points
16 Feb 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
Feb 2012 | Jan 2012 | Dec 2011 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

A good solution or a quick fix?
22 Feb 2012
Should women suffering from anorexia take pills to suppress hunger? Should women suffering from fertility take pills to suppress babies?

From law to decree
21 Feb 2012
Obama's health care act shows that decrees issued by government bureaucrats have displaced the rule of law.

Carnage
20 Feb 2012
Roman Polanki's latest film mercilessly skewers the superficial values of America's snobbish elite.

God is dead! Can I have his stuff?
20 Feb 2012
It had to come: heresy has broken out among the new atheists.

A portrait of universal values
17 Feb 2012
A photo of a fleeting moment in the Arab Spring demonstrations in Yemen is the winner of the 2011 World…


 Tags
technology, parenting, demography, fertility, education, recession, family values, AIDS, child welfare, Obama, education of children, friendship, abortion, childcare, work-life balance, girls, United Nations, South Africa, work, child safety, teenagers, immigration, parental rights, one-child policy, child obesity, fashion, feminism, marriage, health, prostitution, family structure, internet, child development, anger, happiness, smacking, United States, single motherhood, fathers, men, gender, Hollywood, children, Australia, child abuse, dating, emerging adults, family policy, contraception, research, homosexuality, China, video games, character education, polygamy, self-control, young adult, birth control, New Zealand, divorce, sexualisation of children, television, commitment, child wellbeing, large families, obesity, ageing, family economics, family meals, media ethics, children's health, morality, working mothers, media, adolescence, family breakdown, sex education, youth, women, books, schools, mental health, same-sex marriage, family, motherhood, brain, gender equality, pornography, Spain, sexual behaviour, fatherhood, poverty, trafficking, suicide, baby boomers, adoption, abstinence, social media, religion, psychology, violence, Africa, social networking, cohabitation, unemployment, family relationships, France,