September
19th
  6:48:36 PM

Cognitive function enhancing video games? Hmmm

video gamingDo action video games make you smarter? Some research says, yes.

Numerous studies published over the past decade have found that training on fast-paced video games such as Medal of Honor and Grand Theft Auto that require a wide focus and quick responses has broad 'transfer effects' that enhance other cognitive functions, such as visual attention. Some of the studies have been highly cited and widely publicized.

And you can see why. What parent (or, as gamers age, wife or girlfriend) wouldn’t want to be reassured that all that cash, time and energy wasn’t totally wasted? And yet, other research into how that initial research was done finds that the studies are so flawed, you can’t possibly come to that conclusion, or, for that matter, any conclusion.

Research showing that action video games have a beneficial effect on cognitive function is seriously flawed, according to a review published this week in Frontiers in Psychology.

It’s a detailed report, and this is a short post, so do read for yourself, if gaming research interests you. I have to admit my bias: the mere mention in the article of “expert gamers” and “college-age participants” left me with the feeling that some of these fellows seriously need to get a life. A real one.

This concluding quotation made me chuckle, because it’s so painfully self-evident:

The team suggests that all future studies into the effects of gaming should follow the basic principles of good experimental design.

In other words, follow this crazy thing called “scientific method”? I was tempted to think the researchers who designed the flawed studies were themselves cognitively-challenged. Uncharitable, I know, but what else do you call someone who claims to be a researcher yet ignores (or is unaware of) the rigours of scientific method? Were they perhaps just a little too eager to prove the benefits of gaming? Had they received industry funding, or were hoping for it? Or were they just enthusiastic gamers themselves (“expert” or otherwise).

In any case, I'm not sure we need any sort of research to tell us that a little good clean fun (excluding rape-and-murder type of games) is beneficial in terms of stress-relief and relaxation; anything further might just be wishful thinking. As great-grandpa used to say, everything in moderation.



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts

 Recent Posts
Declaration of 2013 World Congress of Families
21 May 2013
World Congress of Families 2013
19 May 2013
Rise of the stay-at-home dad
15 May 2013
Record proportion of new mothers are college educated
13 May 2013
Brenda Heist case reveals increase in mothers who leave their children
11 May 2013

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
May 2013 | Apr 2013 | Mar 2013 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

Jolie’s Choice
20 May 2013
Angelina Jolie's decision to have a double mastectomy made headlines around the world. But is she sending women the right…

We’re all mad here
21 May 2013
That's the message of the new edition of the bible for American psychiatrists, DSM-5. Diagnostic inflation is about to become…

A fight for equality or a war on difference?
20 May 2013
To invite the government to give us phony equalities by recognising gay marriage is to invite greater state intervention into…

Star Trek: Into Darkness
20 May 2013
The familiar characters face very contemporary issues of terrorism and militarism in this nicely characterised film.

How legal euthanasia changed Belgium for ever
17 May 2013
The ideology of absolute self-determination has become sacred and unquestionable.


 Tags
emerging adults, parental rights, language, same-sex marriage, religion, United States, morality, celebrities, HomeMakers Project, Canada, youth, child wellbeing, brain, women, divorce, abstinence, ageing, motherhood, USA, immigration, Sweden, economics, gendercide, friendship, work-life balance, New Zealand, family economics, fatherhood, one-child policy, girls, family structure, young adult, mothers, child welfare, unemployment, homeschooling, UK, child obesity, contraception, family, work, pregnancy, gender equality, parents, family breakdown, gender, baby boomers, family values, child abuse, demography, child safety, AIDS, sleep, birth control, smacking, psychology, health, polygamy, media ethics, South Africa, children, abortion, video games, families, Spain, modesty, names, technology, anger, sexualisation of children, fertility, poverty, same-sex parenting, books, Barack Obama, mental health, daycare, commitment, child development, media, violence, United Nations, research, Hollywood, adolescence, working mothers, single motherhood, happiness, homosexuality, marriage, France, education of children, Africa, trafficking, China, boys, suicide, prostitution, childcare, character education, family meals, parenting, men, internet, Facebook, parenthood, social networking, fashion, television, ageing population, obesity, European Union, pornography, internet safety, teenage pregnancy, cohabitation, dating, HIVAIDS, large families, character, feminism, social media, family policy, child behaviour, fathers, child poverty, adolescents, sex education, texting, self-control, family relationships, recession, National Marriage Project, adoption, teenagers, sexual behaviour, schools, children's health, Australia, education, teen pregnancy,