June
29th
  3:34:31 PM

Disney world ‘too heterosexual’ for children’s good

Many experts are concerned about the effects on children of their being immersed in electronic media from a tender age. They worry largely about the things they are not doing while watching TV or videos: developing their vocabulary through talking to their parents; listening to or reading books; going to the park for healthy exercise and social activities. But two sociologists have come up with a novel reason for fretting about kids’ exposure to media: the risk of seeing heterosexuality as normal and desirable.

Yes, desirable! for heaven’s sake. Karin Martin and Emily Kazyak, writing in the latest issue of, ahem, Gender and Society, analysed all G-rated movies released, or re-released, between 1990 and 2005 that grossed more than $100 million in the United States. And guess what they found…

The analysis found the films "depict a rich and pervasive heterosexual landscape," despite the assumption that children's media are free of sexual content. The movies repeatedly mark relationships between opposite sex lead characters as special and magical.

"Characters in love are surrounded by music, flowers, candles, magic, fire, balloons, fancy dresses, dim lights, dancing and elaborate dinners," the researchers observed. "Fireflies, butterflies, sunsets, wind and the beauty and power of nature often provide the setting for—and a link to the naturalness of—hetero-romantic love."

But wait, it gets worse. These characters are depicted as “overtly feminised women and masculine males, with the male characters spending much of their time longingly gazing at the former. Toys and other products tied to the films later reinforce the images.”

Some people might worry about the sexualization of children’s media and merchandise. Period. In the UK children as young as four are being suspended from school for inappropriate sexual behaviour.

But our University of Michigan sociologists seem more concerned that “children understand the normativity of heterosexuality by the time they enter elementary school, relegating homosexuality to the abnormal, unusual and unexpected, necessitating explanation.”

It’s all the work of Disney artists stuck in the 19th century with the Brothers Grimm, apparently.

Even president Obama, who has declared June to be Gay pride Month, will have trouble changing this, we think. At least until he has finished with health care reform…

Science Daily, Jun 22

Bookmark and Share
 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to FamilyEdge
rss RSS feed of posts
or get posts by email

 Recent Posts
The Jupiter concedes abstinence ed can work
9 Feb 2010
‘Equal parenting rights after separation’ law under threat from Australian government
8 Feb 2010
German homeschooling family granted political asylum in USA
4 Feb 2010
Abstinence education: study proves it works
2 Feb 2010
The borrowers
1 Feb 2010

 MercatorNet blogs
Style and culture: Tiger Print
US political scene: Sheila Liaugminas
News about bioethics: BioEdge

 Archive
Jan 2010 | Dec 2009 | Nov 2009 | more >>

 From MercatorNet's home page

A geek with cheek
9 Feb 2010
What right has Bill Gates to dress down Italy and its prime minister?

Germany’s awful choice
9 Feb 2010
In the not too distant future, Greece will probably default on its national debt. How will the EU's most powerful…

Citizens United and the problem of modern judicial activism
9 Feb 2010
Why the concept of “strict scrutiny” is alien to the Constitution and why it poses a threat to a constitutionally…

Super Bowl battle:  abortion, a pro, and a choice
6 Feb 2010
Controversy over an ad for the big event makes you wonder what some folks mean by 'choice'.

Muslim face veils: religious right, or security risk?
6 Feb 2010
In an opening article on this issue an Australian journalist says veils are a security risk in the West and…


 Tags
1970s, abortion, abstinence, adolescence, adoption, adultery, AIDS, anger, art, Australia, birth control, books, Catholicism, cervical cancer, character, character education, charity, child abuse, child development, child safety, childbirth, childcare, children, children's health, children's rights, China, Christian, Christianity, co-ed dormitories, communication, condoms, disability, divorce, DNA testing, donor gametes, Down syndrome, economy, education, environment, European Union, family, family meals, family policy, family values, fashion, fathers, feminism, fertility, Gardasil, gender, Germany, Google, grandparents, habits, Haiti, happiness, health, history, Hollywood, homeschooling, homosexuality, HPV, human rights, humility, immigration, internet, IVF, Korea, language, large families, literature, love, Malaysia, marriage, media, men, mental health, modesty, monogamy, motherhood, movies, negative, New Zealand, Obama, obesity, one-child policy, optimism, parenthood, parenting, Philippines, polyamory, polygamy, pornography, pregnancy, pro-life movement, protest, psychology, public opinion, religion, responsibility, self-control, sex education, sexualisation of children, single mother, singles, smacking, social networking, South Africa, Spain, tax breaks, teenagers, television, test, trafficking, twins, unborn child, unemployment, United Kingdom, United Nations, United States, vaccination, virtue, women, work, work-life balance, working mothers, writing,