Latest posts  
May
22
  3:50:52 PM

Well-placed suspicion

We are urged by public service announcements and marketing campaigns to be organ donors. State drivers licensing facilities make that easy with a check mark on their forms, so your license identifies you immediately as a donor. But that’s a dangerous thing to do…

Without exaggeration, listing yourself as an organ donor can lead to an early death. Americans are right to be wary.

A poll has come out about the public’s attitudes toward organ donation that allegedly shows us as ignorant and unduly distrustful of the system. I think this requires a closer look. From the story “Lingering Myths Discourage Organ Donation”:

“Only 38% of licensed drivers have joined their states’ organ donor registries, with many deterred by long-held misconceptions about how the transplant system works, according to poll results released in April. The survey of 5,100 American adults, conducted on behalf of the organ-donation advocacy group Donate Life America, found that:

50% think that registering as organ donors means physicians will not try as hard to save their lives.”

Perhaps that is because people realize that medical ethics have taken a distinct utilitarian turn in recent years, what with futile care theory and health care rationing in the offing. Knowing that people with severe cognitive disabilities are being disdained by some as “non persons” and looked upon as potential natural resources, adds to the fear. It is unreasonable to expect folk to compartmentalize organ donation from the rest of the problems with health care.

Another poll finding:

“26% believe that patients determined to be brain dead can recover from their injuries.”

Perhaps that is because the criteria utilized to declare death by neurological criteria are not uniform throughout the country and in at least a few cases, supposedly brain dead people “woke up.” Also, too many people in the media use the term “brain death” far too loosely, such as calling Terri Schiavo brain dead, when, before she was dehydrated to death, she was clearly alive.

Clear to anyone who looks at the facts. Wesley picks just one example to illustrate:

The title of the piece is, “South Korea Court Grants ‘Right to Die.” Huh? If someone is already dead–which is what brain dead is–how can she be described as “terminally ill” and granted “a right to die?” (This case is really about the right to remove unwanted life-sustaining treatment.) Also the children say this will relieve their mother’s pain. But if she’s in pain, she isn’t dead. (And if she’s truly unconscious, she’s not in pain.)

Right. Apply logic. Exercise caution.



 
about this blog | Bookmark and Share

Search this blog

 Subscribe to Sheila's newsletter
rss Subscribe to Sheila's RSS feed

 Recent Posts
The impact of Obama silencing military chaplains
8 Feb 2012
Big abortion’s ‘gangster tactics’
6 Feb 2012
What did we learn from the Komen-PP fiasco?
6 Feb 2012
About Komen’s reversal…
5 Feb 2012
Komen defunds Planned Parenthood
1 Feb 2012

 MercatorNet blogs
Population issues: Demography is Destiny
Family social policy: Family Edge
Style and culture: Tiger Print
News about bioethics: BioEdge
From the editors: Conniptions

 Archive
Feb 2012 | Jan 2012 | Dec 2011 | more >>

  From MercatorNet's home page

Lost in Transition III: A collective challenge
9 Feb 2012
Who is to blame for the moral ignorance of young adults, and what is to be done?

Pink Lego
8 Feb 2012
Why are feminists throwing their toys out of the cot over a victory for girl power?

Oh, Britannia!
7 Feb 2012
It's not her fault but six decades on, Queen Elizabeth rules a wave of social disintegration.

Tightening the screws
7 Feb 2012
The Obama Adminstration is attacking religious rights by mandating that all health-care plans, even church-run one, must provide cover for…

Shifty words
6 Feb 2012
What does “marriage equality” actually mean?


 Tags
Tea Party, conscience protection, Manhattan Declaration, President Obama, health care reform, religion, partial-birth abortion,