Even liberals are getting cold feet on legalizing pot

Once the facts are on the table, the conclusion is irresistible.
Kathy Gyngell | Sep 22 2014 | comment  



The Washington Post came out against the legalising of pot in the District of Columbia in an editorial recently.

Though a supporter of the decriminalisation of medical marijuana, when it was on the ballot a few years ago, the Post has drawn the line at outright legalisation (which is what’s on the ballot this November in DC). The Post commented that “the rush to legalise marijuana gives us – and we hope voters – serious pause”. It refused too to buy into that pot-pusher canard that pot is no different than alcohol, saying clearly that marijuana “is not harmless.”

This is hardly rocket science so why I am I blogging about it? Does it matter? The answer is Yes. For such an influential ‘liberal' organ to come out with this caution is significant.

Whether it marks a turning of the pro-pot and pro-legalisation tide remains to be seen. But what it does prove is that hearts and minds – even those of liberal diehards - are there for the winning once the bald facts are in the public domain.

That is where Kevin Sabet, co-founder of the project Smart Approaches to Marijuana (SAM) and author of Reefer Sanity: Seven Great Myths About Marijuana, has been putting them. It was his cataloguing of what’s been going on in Colorado since legalisation that provoked the Post’s concern about bringing a Colorado-style experiment to its home turf.

The editorial had also picked up on a report that found that teenagers who smoke marijuana daily are 60 percent less likely to complete high school (one I wrote about here last week).

But it is not just in Colorado that the pot pusher’s paradise is being seen through. In Uruguay too, their new marijuana law is under fire.

All the money spent persuading members of Uruguayan parliament to vote Yes to legalisation has left the public cold. The majority are as against legalisation now as they were before; none believe that the real motive behind it was to improve health.

The argument that legalisation is necessary for health and human rights is of course a fallacious one.

That hasn’t stopped the Global Commission on Drugs Policy from using it. This is the body that Neil Mckeganey revealed here to be a front for drug legalisation. It is also on a mission to throw over the international drug conventions in 2016, at a special session of the United Nations General Assembly on the world drug problem.

Though presented by some former heads of state, the Global Commission's challenge to the international drug control regime was drafted with the assistance of Steve Rolles, Danny Kushlick, Martin Jelsma, Mike Trace, and Ethan Nadelmann, all of whom are long term and passionate advocates and lobbyists for drugs legalisation.

And a healthy dose of scepticism is advised before reading their thinly veiled propaganda. It is based on the straw man that current international policy is naïve and offers false promises.

Far from it. No one who actually reads the detailed publications of either the International Narcotics Board or the United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime or follows their pragmatic responses to this complex problem could possibly accuse them of this.

It is the Global Commission that is naive – to think that normalising drug use and removing any constraints will improve health or protect human rights.

There is already evidence that the opposite is the case now that recreational use of cannabis is legal in Colorado and Washington State, and pot can be purchased for medicinal use in 23 other states and Washington, D.C.

Today nearly 1 in 10 Americans show up to work high on marijuana, a new report has revealed. And last week’s publication of national Drug Testing data revealed that the percentage of positive drug tests among American workers has increased for the first time in more than a decade, fuelled by a rise in marijuana and amphetamines use; and that marijuana positivity increased 6.2 per cent nationally in urine drug tests, and by double digits in Colorado and Washington

As more states fall into normalisation and legalisation of pot such stats will only get worse. Business however will be ever more eager to exploit the growing habit.

Indeed it was with much fanfare, that, with the ex-president of Mexico, Vicente Fox, the passionate legalising advocate and member of the GCDP in tow, the former head of Microsoft corporate strategy, James Shivley, announced earlier this year that he was creating “the Starbucks of marijuana.”

The Washington Post’s next step will be, I hope, to editorialise on this.

Kathy Gyngell is Editor of The CONSERVATIVE WOMAN. This article has been republished with permission. 



This article is published by Kathy Gyngell and MercatorNet.com under a Creative Commons licence. You may republish it or translate it free of charge with attribution for non-commercial purposes following these guidelines. If you teach at a university we ask that your department make a donation. Commercial media must contact us for permission and fees. Some articles on this site are published under different terms.

comments powered by Disqus
Follow MercatorNet
Facebook
Twitter
MercatorNet RSS feed
subscribe to newsletter
Sections and Blogs
Harambee
PopCorn
Conjugality
Careful!
Family Edge
Sheila Reports
Reading Matters
Demography Is Destiny
Bioedge
Conniptions
Connecting
Above
Vent
From the Editor
Information
contact us
our ideals
our People
our contributors
Mercator who?
partner sites
audited accounts
donate
advice for writers
privacy policy
New Media Foundation
L1 488 Botany Rd
Alexandria NSW 2015
Australia

editor@mercatornet.com
+61 2 8005 8605
skype: mercatornet

© New Media Foundation