You have dogmas, but I don’t

We all live by dogmas. The important thing is to recognise them and ensure that they lead to happiness and fulfilment, not destruction and misery.
Matthew Hanley | Aug 11 2010 | comment  

We have asked several of our contributors to respond to a question in our occasional series of forums. This time the question is: What is the world's most dangerous idea? We expect that the answers will be quite controversial. Please add your comments. 

The world’s most dangerous idea would have to bear upon its biggest problems; these are not political or economic in nature, but ultimately cultural in origin – which is to say that they are in some way related to religion.  It would be difficult not to include among them the breakdown of the family – the scale and speed of which is hard to imagine without the birth control pill.  Though it promises “control” – an illusion – it has instead delivered discord, demographic disaster, and ultimately deflationary pressures in the economy. A similar frame of mind – “if it works, it is ok” – also justified the unscrupulous financial practices which contributed mightily to our present economic woes.

More precisely, then, our biggest problems can be traced back to moral and intellectual shortcomings which, in our present cultural climate, are no longer recognized as such.  To point them out is to risk giving offense; contemporary life is thus governed by deceptive if fashionable convention rather than by truth.  

This never bodes well.

And it is all the more dangerous because so few recognize it. As G.K. Chesterton perceived back in 1923, there are two kinds of people: “those who have a dogma and know it, and those who have a dogma and don’t know it.” The very word dogma is almost always used today in a pejorative sense. To call someone dogmatic is to call someone rigid, unthinking, and hopelessly out of touch with the way things are nowadays; this has proven an effective means of dismissing “old-fashioned” ideas which clash with personal preferences - the way we wish things were.  But the fact of the matter is that we all live by dogma; it is therefore a great good to be able to name them for what they are. 

While many imagine they are merely living by the dictates of reason, science, or progress, they are really living by relativism – the overarching dogma of the West today.  (Never mind that adherents of relativism often make universal claims, such as “Female Genital Mutilation is wrong”, or “equality laws are necessary to prevent discrimination.” Such claims, irrespective of their validity, are inconsistent with pure relativism.)

Relativism ensures that solutions to our most pressing health care and bioethical issues are pursued chiefly by recourse to scientism and utilitarianism; these ideologies might be portrayed as pragmatic, compassionate, and enlightened, but they are profoundly hostile to human dignity.

The void created by relativism has gone hand in hand with the advance of radical individualism; what else is there other than the self when broader truths are rejected? But the incessant pursuit of the self’s own desires (at the expense of truth, human nature, and the common good) leads us further away from rather than closer to happiness and fulfillment.  It might seem paradoxical, given the West’s unprecedented material prosperity, but a profound despair – what Kierkegaard called the “sickness unto death” – has in fact proliferated alongside the modern West’s cult of the self.  Such despair may even help explain its astounding population implosion; at any rate, it is an emblematic feature of the culture of death.

That our modern dogmas lead to tyranny might be difficult to perceive in an era of ever expanding “rights” (even though Plato recognized long ago that tyranny was quite compatible with democracy).  After all, the classical tyrannies of old revoked natural rights and liberties. But as Spanish author Juan Manuel de Prada observes, today’s “rights” derive not from nature but from inflamed self-will and the legal power of the state – a much more precarious provenance.

Social harmony and authentic development cannot be imposed. But the first step in rectifying our situation – and protecting ourselves from an expanding tyranny – is to disabuse ourselves of the notion that dogma is the strict province of narrow-minded religious fundamentalists. Dogma can lead to our fulfillment and happiness, or to our destruction and misery.  What our dogma actually is, in short, makes all the difference in the world.

Matthew Hanley is the author, with Jokin D. Irala MD of Affirming Love, Avoiding AIDS: What Africa Can Teach the West.

Copyright © Matthew Hanley . Published by You may download and print extracts from this article for your own personal and non-commercial use only. Contact us if you wish to discuss republication.

comments powered by Disqus
Follow MercatorNet
MercatorNet RSS feed
subscribe to newsletter
Sections and Blogs
Family Edge
Sheila Reports
Reading Matters
Demography Is Destiny
From the Editor
contact us
our ideals
our People
our contributors
Mercator who?
partner sites
audited accounts
advice for writers
privacy policy
New Media Foundation
Level 1, Unit 7,
11 Lord Street,
Botany Australia 2019
+61 2 8005 8605
skype: mercatornet

© New Media Foundation