Blaming recent unrest in Britain on the ‘Far Right’ is only half the story

The official story circulating on BBC and echoed by government and police spokespersons is that the riots and unrest seen in the UK in recent weeks are the product of a tiny minority of “far right” hooligans and criminals, egged on by “disinformation” about the circumstances of the awful murder of innocent children in Southport, in particular the identity of the 17-year-old assailant, who was initially alleged to be a Muslim refugee, and later turned out to be a Welsh-born citizen born to Rwandan parents. This official story is not, strictly speaking, false. But it is only half the story.

The race riots, street violence, and public unrest we have seen in recent weeks have complex underlying causes, and are not susceptible to any simply, one-dimensional explanation. Yet in their eagerness to condemn “far right” rioters and looters, many public commentators omit to mention that the visceral anger of the rioters is really just an extreme and unlawful expression of the anger and frustration of many ordinary, law-abiding citizens, whose concerns about immigration and its impact on their communities are usually either ignored or blithely dismissed as “disinformation” or “far right” propaganda.

Don’t get me wrong: I’m not suggesting for a second that it is in any way justified to hurl rocks at a mosque, or injure police officers, or set refugee accommodation centres on fire, or engage in disorderly conduct, or intimidate people of other religions or ethnicities. I’m not suggesting for a second that anti-immigrant violence should be tolerated or encouraged.

But I would suggest that the condemnation of “far right” agitation and violence should not lead us to overlook the broader societal discontent and fragmentation that such violence emerges from. Our condemnation of far right violence should not be allowed to blind us to the fact that a very large proportion of citizens who express disquiet over immigration policy, or attend public rallies to raise awareness of their concerns, are not violent thugs, or “far right” agitators; just regular, law-abiding citizens who are worried about how poorly controlled immigration will impact their access to housing and public services, or the safety of their streets, or the cohesion and prosperity of their neighbourhoods.

If deep discontent with the UK’s immigration policy was restricted to “far right” hooligans, we could not explain the remarkable success of the Brexit movement, one of whose primary selling points was its opposition to “mass immigration,” which saw through a successful Brexit referendum in 2016. Nor could we explain the fact that in the 2024 elections, Nigel Farage’s Reform party, with its call for stricter controls on immigration, managed to win 15 percent of the popular vote, in a first-past-the-post system in which many of the Reform voters knew they were likely handing the election to Labour.

Of course, it is psychologically comforting to blame a social problem on a single scapegoat. It makes you feel more comfortable, because the problem is contained and limited to whomever you have chosen to scapegoat - be it those pesky refugees, or the Muslims, or the Jews, or the conservative hill-billies, or the “Far Right.” But it may also be myopic, if the problem happens to be a complex one, with multiple underlying causes.

Those who, in the face of growing unrest surrounding immigration and race, limit themselves to condemning far right violence, are missing out on a golden opportunity to open a sophisticated public conversation about fragmented communities across the UK, about the real and perceived failures of immigration policy, and about the reasons why immigration remains such a “hot button issue” in towns and cities across Britain.

 

icon

Join Mercator today for free and get our latest news and analysis

Buck internet censorship and get the news you may not get anywhere else, delivered right to your inbox. It's free and your info is safe with us, we will never share or sell your personal data.

Public disquiet in the UK over immigration policy is real, and goes far beyond “far right” agitation. Even when that disquiet is not on the front pages of British newspapers, it continues to bubble under the surface, as some communities feel that their access to public services and housing, as well as the future of their way of life, are threatened by disproportionate levels of immigration, including illegal immigration.

According to a 2023 analysis of professional opinion polls undertaken by the Migration Observatory, 37 percent of Britons believe immigration should be reduced “a lot,” and 15 percent believe it should be reduced “a little,” compared with 6 percent who believe it should be increased “a lot” and 8 percent who think it should be increased “a little.” In short, over half of the population believe there is too much immigration, while more than one in three believe there is far too much immigration.

The superficiality of the “official” British response to the unfolding unrest may come down to a sort of wishful thinking: if we just keep the focus on the “far right,” then we can just round up the culprits, pack our bags, and go home. After all, what politician or head of police wants to grasp the nettle of a racially charged issue like immigration, in a way that seriously engages with the demands of disgruntled citizens and communities?

Nevertheless, until public authorities and opinion leaders start to respectfully engage with citizens who believe illegal immigration is out of control, as well communities that worry over the impact of immigration on social cohesion, housing, public services, and public finances, the disquiet and resentment will continue to brew. Sadly, we can expect more unrest and disorder if public authorities do not engage in a respectful way with citizens’ legitimate fears and concerns. 


Should politicians take public disquiet over immigration more seriously? Tell us in the comments below.


David Thunder is a researcher and lecturer of political philosophy at the University of Navarra in Pamplona, Spain.

This article has been republished from David Thunder’s Substack, The Freedom Blog.

Image credit: Rioting in Southport on July 30 / StreetMic LiveStream / WikiMedia


 

Showing 6 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Steven Meyer
    commented 2024-08-14 10:58:57 +1000
    mrscracker,

    When does a label become a description? When people call me a man, are they labelling me or are the simply stating a fact about me?

    When a Republican politician calls Kamala Harris a “communist” does he mean it? Or is he simply reciting the part line?

    Similarly when a Democrat calls the Republicans “Fascists”?

    Are they any more sincere than the actress in a TV commercial who pretends to find a man wearing XYZ Cologne irresistible?

    I am labelling people in public life who use these labels grifters, etc because that’s usually what they are.
  • mrscracker
    Well, just my two cents but I think labeling is not a good idea all around.
  • Steven Meyer
    commented 2024-08-10 08:44:32 +1000
    Zander P, I for one do not label people who have concerns about immigration, or think the locals should take precedence over refugees, as “far right.”

    Nor do I label people who distribute tampons “far left”.

    I label people in public life who use these labels “spin doctors”, “charlatans”. “grifters” and “fraudsters” because, usually, that’s what they are.
  • Zander P
    commented 2024-08-10 04:45:11 +1000
    I would point out that other comments here seem to be labouring under the impression that being against uncontrolled immigration, amongst other issues, makes you a far right nazi – and this is causing a lot of unease and upset across great swathes of the country. Given the numbers who voted Reform UK this time round, don’t expect to see PR brought in during this governments first term.
    The sad fact is economically the country is struggling, and health and local services are already showing the strain. For example, our local council, Bolton, has over 22000 on the housing waiting list, was able to apparently find places for Syrian refugees amongst others, when the call went out. This presumably because they came with a budget sweetener, and unlike many, Bolton council doing very well budget wise. Now for many of those people who are on that housing wait list with little or no realistic chance of finding a home – why should people who have never paid taxes in the UK take precedence? The indigenous population have for generations being paying into the system in one way or another. They deserve to be heard. Yes, the refugees are vulnerable, but so are most people who need social housing.
    Take the NHS – waiting lists are massive and seemingly getting worse. My mum and my wife are awaiting operations and treatment, ‘urgently’ although are already over a year into a wait. My mum worked in the NHS as a Nurse for 60 years and has always paid into the system – how is she to feel knowing people are arriving by boat and getting immediate access to care, and putting an already stretched service under increased strain. If you feel there are enough ‘right minded people’ would you care to have a referendum on whether to completely ban all immigration into the UK? Do you honestly think that’d go well. You may as well have a referendum on bringing back hanging. People can be very nasty in private in the voting booth,
    No, the fact is by being tarred with the brush as a ‘far right nazi’ and people who ‘deserve to have their throats cut’ according to one labour councillor, the narrative is being dangerously and perversely skewed. Two Tier Kier certainly seems to deserve that nickname. During the Palestinian crisis protests (very few of whom protested the Russian invasion of Ukraine) Jewish people were put in fear when large crowds of certain demographics were able to call for the destruction of Israel and express support for Hamas – a proscribed organisation. Indeed we had the laughable scenes whereby British Police Officers refused to act for fear of inflaming tensions. Why weren’t those offenders thrown rapidly thrown in jail, where were the Cobra meetings then? All this does not go unnoticed, and starts to foster more hardening of attitudes; more and more people are starting to harbour views and suspicions that make them vulnerable to exploitation online. People like my mum who holds a Phd and who served the NHS for 60 years, are being told their views are far right? Don’t be surprised when they vote Reform next time and don’t get upset at the consequences. You had your chance to listen.
    You know what also crosses my mind though – divide and conquer is the oldest tactic in the book. Its almost as if people were being nudged in a certain direction to create this divide so as to distract people from the fact that Britain is a grotesquely unequal society where the one percent get richer and the 99% get poorer. It certainly helps to cause a little division and take the attention of oneselves,
    A case in point for all those who wish to throw open the borders – healthcare tourism is a thing and it is real. Wythenshaw Hospital has a maternity unit and is unfortunately located a 5 minute journey from Manchester Airport. This was underlined in a story that first appeared in the Manchester Evening News where a Nigerian lady, educated at Harvard in the US, flew into Manchester and got a taxi straight to the maternity unit where she walked in with a scan revealing she needed an emergency caesarean, an operation that cost the British tax payer ten thousand pounds. She had never lived in the UK or paid taxes, but the British tax payer picked up the bill for her birth. That might make you proud, but when relatives can’t get operations, and people die because there isn’t funding for expensive cancer treatments, this kind of sticks in the throat.
    And this is the problem; an ageing population needs more taxpayers to support it. That’s going to be hard to achieve without immigration. There is a £20bn hole in the public purse that means services are going to be further cut. Councils will continue to go bust like Birmingham. How can we put more pressure on local authorities and the NHS? Are those who say throw the borders open willing to pay significantly more tax? Its fine saying tax the rich but they’ll just flee and take it with them. That makes things harder still. A population going through a painful reduction in living standards is going to look for people to blame. Insulting them by branding them far right Nazi’s isn’t going to help – you cant insult people or berate them into agreeing with you – but it will strengthen the hand of Farage et al.
  • Steven Meyer
    commented 2024-08-09 17:38:26 +1000
    I think this Youtube clip gives a balanced view of the riots and counter protests,

    Huge Counter Protests Show the Real Britain
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSAFdp-081A

    Yes, I’m sure many people are upset about the huge influx of migrants. This is also true in Australia where the immigration surge is contributing to the greatest housing crisis in the nation’s history.

    But, to their credit, the counter protesters demonstrated that a few thousand thugs do not speak for the British people. Pretending they do is the kind of misreporting we have come to expect from media. It’s a case of “If it bleeds it leads”.

    And the right wing nuts pretending this is anything more than thuggery and a media beat up are also performing as expected.

    It’s depressing that every aspect of society performs so predictably. Have we all become Pavlov’s conditioned dogs?
  • David Thunder
    published this page in The Latest 2024-08-09 15:09:37 +1000