- Free newsletter
- The Latest
- Topics
-
About
How can ‘the most moral army in the world’ kill 34,000 people in Gaza?
Is the Israeli Defense Force “the most moral army in the world”? Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeated this slogan again and again.
In December, in an interview with Jewish News Syndicate, Israel Defense Forces international spokesman Major Doron Spielman said “I don’t think there’s been another army in history that has ever taken this much concern for a civilian population, of the enemy it is trying to defeat.”
The IDF warned Gazans before striking, he said, thereby losing operation surprise: “People eventually are going to be looking back to Israel as probably the unreachable model of what an army can do to take care of a civilian population.”
Four months later, these words sound hollow, even absurd. As calculated by Gaza’s health ministry, 34,000 people have died in Gaza, most of them civilians, under the Israeli bombardment. The enclave has become an apocalyptic wasteland. Israel has been rebuked by the Biden Administration and the UN Security Council has voted for a ceasefire.
The latest indication that the IDF is failing morally is the possibility that one of its units, the Netzah Yehuda brigade, will be sanctioned by the Biden Administration for human rights abuses on the West Bank. It is made up mostly of ultra-Orthodox nationalists and has a reputation for treating Palestinians harshly. It has been linked to the death of a 78-year-old Palestinian man with American citizenship, Omar As’ad, who died of heart failure after being arrested, handcuffed, blindfolded and abandoned in near-freezing conditions.
Most moral, then?
But definitely more moral than Hamas, its opponent in Gaza, whose fighters are being hailed as heroes on American campuses.
Hamas started the war on October 7 with an unprovoked assault on southern Israel in which its militants killed about 1,200 people and took 253 hostages. But a worse crime still was leaving the innocent civilian population of Gaza exposed to retaliation by the IDF.
Israel’s response was perfectly predictable. It did what the United States did in Afghanistan and Iraq – it attacked with overwhelming strength. It always has. Moshe Dayan said in 1955: “We do not have the means to prevent the murders of [Israeli] workers in orchards or of families sleeping in their beds at night. What we can do is set a very high price for our blood, so high that no Arab locality, Arab army or Arab government will want to pay it.”
Hamas knew that. So Hamas bears some responsibility for every death in Gaza. It isn’t just indifferent to the suffering of Gazans after October 7; it wants them to suffer, as part of its strategy of humiliating Israel morally and detaching it from its allies.
Furthermore, Hamas has an appalling record of human rights abuses. In 2007 it fought a brief civil war with Fatah. A report by the Palestine Center for Human Rights, which normally is highly critical of Israel, detailed the atrocities committed by both sides.
“The fighting included: extra-judicial and willful killings of combatants who laid down their arms; killing a number of wounded persons inside hospitals; abduction and torture; using houses and apartment buildings in the fighting, endangering the lives of civilians; obstruction of access of medical and civil defense crews to areas of clashes.”
At least two Fatah officials were thrown off high buildings.
Join Mercator today for free and get our latest news and analysis
Buck internet censorship and get the news you may not get anywhere else, delivered right to your inbox. It's free and your info is safe with us, we will never share or sell your personal data.
Hamas’s ethical guideline in this conflict, as on October 7, was simple: wipe them out. In a statement entitled “We Vow Comeuppance against the Killers,” Hamas declared:
“Enough is enough. Self-restrain, agreements and convention are no longer fruitful with these killers. These wrongful people insist to continue their wrong deeds and killings. If they were left unpunished, they would drown and make us drown with them … The only means that can deter them is killing …”
Bear in mind that it is other Palestinians that Hamas is talking about.
In 2018 Human Rights Watch published a report claiming that “Hamas authorities routinely arrest and torture peaceful critics and opponents with impunity.”
Can there be any doubt of what would happen if the roles of Hamas and Israel were reversed, if Israel were weak and vulnerable and Hamas were strong and dominant?
Israel has lived with an existential fear of annihilation since it declared independence. Hamas’s hatred for the “racist, anti-human and colonial Zionist project” is part of its charter. In the present war, both sides are fighting savagely. Neither side can claim to be “the most moral army in the world”.
Netanyahu’s cruel pursuit of complete victory in Gaza is a terrible strategic mistake, which is alienating its friends and stoking the hatred of its enemies. Nonetheless support for Israel offers the best chance for peace in the long run.
Although its government is flawed and chauvinistic, it is a democracy and aspires to live by the rule of law. It has a free press and its errors eventually are exposed. It is flexible enough, and rational enough, to negotiate with its enemies to achieve a peaceful settlement of historic injustice.
The leaders of Hamas, on the other hand, seek peace through extermination. Their ideology is inherently violent; their governance is vicious and authoritarian. There is no freedom of the press. A peaceful settlement with Hamas is inconceivable.
The number of deaths of Gazan civilians is absurdly disproportionate to the deaths of Israelis on October 7. Netanyahu has to agree to a ceasefire. That is the only way that his nation is going to prove its moral ascendancy over Hamas.
Michael Cook is editor of Mercator
Image credit: IDF footage on NBC News
Have your say!
Join Mercator and post your comments.
-
David Elazar commented 2024-04-27 17:52:03 +1000In general, war is not expected to be moral. To discuss the morality of Israel in the same paragraph with the Hamas, a terrorist organization, is immoral.
The Hamas, not Israel, is responsible for all the destruction and suffering (the more the better for them) as this is part of their strategy “For Israel, every civilian casualty is a tragedy. For Hamas, every civilian casualty is a strategy.”
War is not a picnic. There is no way to protect civilians if the governing body (Hamas) intentionally does not want them protected. Hamas’s “secret” weapon against Israel is dead, wounded, and suffering Palestinians and with the help of the media it is working. -
Andy Mullins commented 2024-04-27 13:28:17 +1000Although Israel cannot be responsible for Hamas atrocities it must be obvious that Hamas policy is driven by the subjugation that Palestinians have suffered for the past 50+ years. Until Israel acknowledges its role in perpetuating the problem there will be no peace.
-
mrscracker commented 2024-04-27 05:48:19 +1000“How can ‘the most moral army in the world’ kill 34,000 people in Gaza?”
*******
Exactly. That should be the first clue the info is dodgy. When the data source is a terrorist mercenary group, then any claim is possible. But that doesn’t make it true.
Granted, the higher Gazan casualties & suffering, the more Hamas benefits by gaining legitimacy & humanitarian funds to steal. That’s how they’ve operated from the very beginning.
The saddest victims are the people of Gaza & I hope one day they’ll figure out how they’ve been ruthlessly exploited by Hamas & Iran. -
Claire Komives followed this page 2024-04-27 01:20:09 +1000
-