- Free newsletter
- The Latest
- Topics
-
About
What's to be done with ISIS children in Syria?
The collapse of Bashar al-Assad's regime and his flight to Russia have plunged Syria into deeper chaos, leaving the Kurdish autonomous zone, controlled by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), in an increasingly precarious position. As the Kurds struggle to defend their territory against attacks from Turkey, Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), and the Syrian National Army, they also face the urgent and unresolved challenge of managing tens of thousands of ISIS-affiliated families, including women and children, detained in Kurdish-run camps.
The indefinite detention of approximately 64,000 women and children, including 8,500 foreign women and children, in camps like Al-Hol and Roj in northeastern Syria under the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) has created a dire humanitarian and legal crisis. Among the detainees are thousands of Europeans, with children making up an estimated 60 percent of the camp population—80 percent of whom are under the age of 12, and nearly one-third younger than five.
Conditions in these camps, described as "inhumane" by human rights organizations, include severe shortages of food, water, healthcare, and education. Children face constant risks of violence, disease, exploitation, and recruitment by ISIS. Many were born to or brought by parents linked to ISIS and grow up in environments of deprivation, trauma, and neglect, making them especially vulnerable to radicalization and the influence of ISIS sleeper cells.
Lacking the infrastructure and resources to manage such large populations, these camps have become breeding grounds for extremism and exploitation. This dire situation poses both a profound humanitarian challenge and a serious threat to regional and global security, as ISIS continues to exploit these destabilized environments to rebuild its networks.
International efforts to repatriate and rehabilitate children from Syrian detention camps have been sporadic and fraught with resistance. Many nations are reluctant to accept their citizens back, even when they are minors. These children endure lives shaped by war, extremism, and global indifference, their futures overshadowed by conflict and a lack of international action.
Repatriation efforts aim to mitigate these risks, particularly for vulnerable minors, but progress has been slow. In April, a US-led operation repatriated a 10-person American family along with individuals from Canada, Finland, and the Netherlands, underscoring the challenges of addressing this crisis.
Indonesia exemplifies the dilemma nations face when addressing the fate of children born to ISIS fighters. Hundreds of Indonesian children remain stranded in camps like Al-Hol and Roj, having endured violence, indoctrination, and displacement in ISIS-controlled territories. The Indonesian government’s 2020 decision to block the return of adult ISIS affiliates has left these children in limbo, despite their lack of choice in their parents' actions.
European countries have largely taken uncoordinated, case-by-case approaches to repatriating detainees, leading to significant delays driven by political fears of public backlash, security concerns, and the lack of a unified European strategy. France, in particular, has faced international criticism for its reluctance to repatriate children of ISIS fighters detained in camps like Al-Hol and Roj. While countries like Germany, Finland, and the Netherlands have implemented more comprehensive repatriation policies for minors, France has only returned a limited number of children, often under strict conditions. Approximately 120 French children and 50 women remain in these camps, enduring what the United Nations has described as "inhumane" conditions, with high child mortality rates and pervasive insecurity.
France’s inconsistent policy is rooted in fears of public backlash, particularly from far-right groups, and concerns about national security following repeated ISIS attacks on French soil. Critics, including legal advocates and international bodies, argue that this approach undermines children’s fundamental rights and increases the risk of radicalization. Despite mounting pressure and legal reprimands from the United Nations and the European Court of Human Rights, France continues to handle repatriations on a case-by-case basis, leaving many children stranded in life-threatening conditions. This debate reflects broader tensions in France regarding national security, integration, and the rights of its Muslim and immigrant populations.
Since 2019, over 1,500 children have been repatriated from Syrian detention camps by countries such as Germany, Sweden, and Kazakhstan. For many of these children, reintegration has been challenging but largely successful. Supported by family members, foster care, and tailored rehabilitation programs, they are excelling in school and thriving in new environments. Experts note that, with proper care, repatriated children are often resilient and able to adapt to normal life.
![icon](https://assets.nationbuilder.com/themes/64195f8245de942a2652a781/attachments/original/1685098072/circle-icon.png?1685098072)
Join Mercator today for free and get our latest news and analysis
Buck internet censorship and get the news you may not get anywhere else, delivered right to your inbox. It's free and your info is safe with us, we will never share or sell your personal data.
However, significant challenges remain. Some governments separate children from their mothers upon arrival, causing additional trauma. Delayed issuance of identity documents complicates access to education and social services, while mental health and educational gaps are particularly prevalent among older children. Community acceptance is another hurdle, as returning children frequently face stigma and suspicion.
Efforts to address these issues require a multi-faceted approach. Repatriation must include psychological screening to address deep trauma, culturally sensitive counseling, and sustained intervention to prevent further radicalization. Education plays a vital role in creating a path away from extremist ideologies. Civil society organizations, educators, and government agencies must work together to shift public perceptions and provide the resources needed for successful reintegration.
Historical lessons offer hope. After the Darul Islam rebellion in Indonesia, children of insurgents faced similar challenges of stigma and suspicion. Instead of marginalizing them, Indonesia prioritized inclusion and education as tools for rehabilitation. By providing access to schooling and opportunities to integrate into mainstream society, the government and civil society organizations helped these children build productive lives despite the legacy of their parents' actions.
These children are victims, and although repatriation efforts are often contentious, they are essential for reducing global terrorism risks and giving these children a chance at recovery. Without concerted international action, the crises in these camps will only worsen, leaving the most vulnerable to suffer the consequences. Historical examples, such as Indonesia's response to the Darul Islam rebellion, demonstrate that inclusive strategies can transform lives and foster long-term security and stability.
What should be done with the children of ISIS fighters? With their spouses? Is it right to let them stay indefinitely in camps?
Antonio Graceffo, PhD, China-MBA MBA, is a China economic analyst teaching economics at the American University in Mongolia. He has spent 20 years in Asia and is the author of six books about China. His writing has appeared in The Diplomat, South China Morning Post, Jamestown Foundation China Brief, Penthouse, Shanghai Institute of American Studies, Epoch Times, War on the Rocks, Just the News, and Black Belt Magazine.
Image credit: Al Hoj camp in Syria / Voice of America screenshot
Have your say!
Join Mercator and post your comments.