The world’s biggest pro-natalist conference will gather in Austin in March

Christmas is coming; 2025 is barreling down upon us. The New Year seems destined to bring monumental change. We are on track for more war, tectonic geopolitical permutations and the beginnings of a global monetary reset.

But will there be a turnaround in that which most ails our species? Sadly not. However, 2025 will bring a most important gathering that will address the issue head-on.

Global ailment

What most ails humanity? The global fertility crisis, aka the birth dearth, what scholarly types call demographic collapse. It is endemic in these oh-so-modern times.

In the last 75 years global total fertility rates (TFRs) have declined over 50 percent, from 4.85 in 1950 to just 2.25 today. By 2100 global TFR is projected to be under 1.6. This is unprecedented: that means never - ever - before – in all of history has there been such a prolonged decline in births. A solid majority of countries are no longer replacing themselves.

The world’s most populous country, India, has a below-replacement TFR of 2.0 (2.1 is replacement level). The East Asian “tiger” economies South Korea, China and Japan have had population decline for years. The entire West is on the cusp of such decline; only decades of mass immigration have delayed it.

If current trends continue, there will be a gradual, ineluctable unwinding of life as we know it, leading to dystopian scenarios of old age pension plan collapse, school closings, industry failures and a pandemic of isolated individuals adrift from family and community.

There is no disagreement about where this is headed. For a detailed analysis, The Lancet’s landmark study“Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021” is an eye-opener. Since the study’s publication in 2021, indicators are that fertility is falling even faster than projected. Yet many so-called “progressives,” self-righteous “Greens” and fad-fixated wokesters view humanity’s decline as a positive development. That is manifestly misanthropic. 

Pronatalist pushback

However, there is consequential consciousness-raising afoot. A growing number of people – transcending race, religion, politics and socio-economic class – are now aware of this debilitating trend. Thanks to pronatalist pronouncements by Pope Francis, various heads of state (Italy’s Meloni, Hungary’s Orbán, Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping) and figures like Elon Musk,  Malcolm and Simone Collins and Hannah’s Children author Catherine Pakaluk, pronatalism is now part of popular culture. This is critical in a world conditioned to images and soundbites. Avidly pronatalist Senator J.D. Vance is now the Vice President-elect. 

Here's some good news from the future: Did I mention a conference? Yes, a gathering of pronatalist partisans will convene once again in Austin, Texas on March 28-29 for the annual Natalism.org conference. Among the speakers will be the above-mentioned Ms. Pakaluk and Mr and Mrs Collins, along with Dr Pat Fagan, Institute for Family Studies scholar Lyman Stone, Professor Michael Anton and prolific blogger and mother of five “Peachy Keenan.” I wonder if Pope Francis was invited. Might he endorse the confab?  

The Bennett’s Phylactery blog just posted “Nobody doubts demographic decline - they just don't trust the "solutions"” about the conference. Excerpts:

In December 2023, we brought together academics, founders, investors, and influencers to explore the scope of global demographic decline and its consequences.

The issue of natalism was regarded as “fringe”. Many of the academics whom we asked to speak turned us down — they agreed with us that demographic decline was a problem, but said it was too professionally risky to take any public position on the birth rate.

Since then, natalism has gone mainstream.

We’re winning the argument that the problem matters.

There are almost no countries on earth that would still have a demographic problem if everyone realized their desired fertility.

We just need to help more people to build the families they want — which means we have to understand what is in the way.

So NatalCon 2025 will focus on finding the root causes of demographic decline, and converting that knowledge into practical guidance.

Our toxic child-unfriendly popular culture needs to change. With leading celebrities and politicians raising the issue, mounting profamily scholarship, restored online freedom of speech (thank you Elon) and folks like the happy warriors assembling in Austin, change is underway.

President-elect Trump recently mentioned falling fertility as one of America’s most pressing challenges. Maybe he is listening to Elon, J. D. Vance and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Remember how Mr. Trump brought the issues of out-of-control immigration, “fake news” and “deep state” in from the shadows? Maybe he’ll help do that with falling fertility as well. No other political figure is as adept at generating fodder for popular culture.

 

Liquid syntax error: Error in tag 'subpage' - No such page slug home-signup

Low fertility ethos

The University of Maryland’s Professor Philip N. Cohen, who calls himself a “liberal pronatalist,” offers an astute observation:

Unlike reducing birth rates, raising them requires convincing people to change their lifestyles and goals in ways that will not benefit them economically, and will produce societal benefits only after a generation or more.

There was a time when the well-being of future generations was the basis for most everything we did. Unfortunately, that has changed.

Why? A significant factor is a corrupt values system that monetizes everything, including family, home and life itself. This is globalism, a malevolent mélange of Enlightenment empiricism, Cultural Marxism and crony finance capitalism (as opposed to free enterprise capitalism). It is a self-defeating ethos; such an agenda is effectively anti-natalist, as it ultimately reduces the number of folks around to feed the system. Terminal hubris fueled by instant gratification has a limited shelf life. We must endure as globalism runs it course. This, too, shall pass.

But back to our friends who’ll be gathering in Austin. Again, the 2025 NatalCon will be from March 28-29. Save the date. Admission is US$1,000, though a discount is offered on the website. I have it on good authority that proceeds after expenses support pronatalist initiatives. This is very encouraging.

Here in the US, we’ve just had our Thanksgiving holiday. We have so many blessings for which to be profoundly grateful. I count among them those intrepid souls coming to Austin. Consider this a four-month heads-up. Let’s endeavor to join them. 


What do you think of the buzz around pro-natalism?  


Louis T. March has a background in government, business, and philanthropy. A former talk show host, author, and public speaker, he is a dedicated student of history and genealogy. Louis lives with his family in the beautiful Shenandoah Valley of Virginia.

Image credit: Bigstock   


 

Showing 6 reactions

Sign in with

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Emberson Fedders
    commented 2024-12-05 11:55:55 +1100
    I believe that fertility rates are falling, Mrs Cracker. That is obvious in all Western countries. I think that capitalism is mostly responsible for that.

    But Trump bringing ‘fake news’ and the ‘deep state’ out from the shadows? That is hyperbolic at best, conspiracy theorist at worst. Fake news is simply the term that Trump uses for anything he doesn’t like. It’s not even original – think Lugenpresse.

    The deep state is just a useful scape-goat to blame for the egregious failings of neo-liberalism.

    And getting advice from Elon Musk, JD Vance and Robert F Kennedy? Narcissistic billionaires, conspiracy theorist and Christian nationalists. None of those three are serious about government. None of those three are interested in helping the millions upon millions of Americans who struggle every day. None of these three will do a single thing to help the working poor of America.

    I would bet good money, though, that over the next four years all three get much, much richer.
  • mrscracker
    You don’t believe falling fertility rates are a real issue Mr. Fedders? Or perhaps I’m misunderstanding your comments?
    I keep repeating myself, but I have a demographer in the family and our birthrates really are becoming problematic. And it’s not just a Western or US issue.
  • Emberson Fedders
    commented 2024-12-04 11:29:36 +1100
    “President-elect Trump recently mentioned falling fertility as one of America’s most pressing challenges. Maybe he is listening to Elon, J. D. Vance and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Remember how Mr. Trump brought the issues of out-of-control immigration, “fake news” and “deep state” in from the shadows? Maybe he’ll help do that with falling fertility as well. No other political figure is as adept at generating fodder for popular culture.”

    Ok, this site is definitely satire.
  • Juan Llor Baños
    commented 2024-12-04 02:27:47 +1100
    Very good news!! Every effort in this direction is very necessary!! Congratulations!!
  • Paul Bunyan
    commented 2024-12-03 16:27:21 +1100
    Can you name any of these societal benefits, Mr March? I doubt it.

    High birth rates only benefit the rich, since it increases the supply of labor. It gives them access to more employees that can be replaced at a moment’s notice. People are seen as expendable.

    And, of course, the more people there are, the more people can be drafted (or pressured) to joining the armed forces to escape abject poverty.

    We can’t keep procreating until every square inch is filled with humans. Population growth is a Ponzi scheme. It needs to end. The sooner the better.
  • Louis T. March
    published this page in The Latest 2024-12-03 15:10:31 +1100