- Free newsletter
- The Latest
- Topics
-
About
This is not fake news: US Surgeon General warns that parenting is a health hazard
The US Surgeon General, Dr Vivek Murthy, just issued an official advisory warning against the stressful nature of parenting and labelling it “an urgent public health issue.” The document says Surgeon General Advisories “require the nation’s immediate awareness and action.” So, according to the Surgeon General, what exactly is the urgent issue and what immediate actions should be taken to rescue parents from the stress of raising their own children?
In short, the advisory cites data showing that parents experience more stress than non-parents and that sometimes, some parents’ stress levels are so high they cannot function. It says parental stress can negatively affect children. It says major sources of parental stress include “financial strain and economic instability, time demands, concerns over children's health and safety, parental isolation and loneliness, difficulty managing technology and social media, and cultural pressures.”
All true.
I’m a mom of five children, and I birthed four of them within a time span of roughly five years. 12 years later, I had a baby in my 40s. We had diapers and dating going on at the same time. I’m no stranger to stress. I have known financial strain, the instability of layoffs, bone-deep fatigue, and so much more.
As for not being able to function, that depends on your definition of the word “function”. (Does inventing games where I lay motionless on the bed while my kids pile heaps of clean laundry on top of me count as “functioning”?) Parenting has beat the stuffing right out of me at times. But through all these years, I never saw my children as a threat to my mental health.
Children are a danger to their parents
This Surgeon General’s Advisory is the first time I recall seeing an official government entity framing children as a clear and present danger to their parents. It reminds me of radical feminist Sophie Lewis’ assertion that babies in utero commit “fetal violence” toward their mothers by introducing health threats to and demanding nourishment from their unfortunate maternal hosts. Likewise, Suzanne Sadedin says an unborn baby employs “manipulation, blackmail, and violence” against its mother while floating in the womb and usurping whatever sustenance it can suck from her body.
Collectivism is always the answer
What does the Surgeon General say should be done about this assault on parents’ health? The “We Can Take Action” section of the advisory starts with this preface: “[W]hile parents and caregivers may have the primary responsibility for raising children… [it] is a collective responsibility.” It then gives a laundry list of collectivist solutions including the following:
- “Bolster support for childcare financial assistance programs such as childcare subsidies and child income tax credits; universal preschool; early childhood education programs.”
- “Establish a national paid family and medical leave program.”
- Prioritise “poverty reduction, prevention of adverse childhood experiences… and improve access to healthy food and affordable housing.”
- “Strengthen public and private insurance coverage of mental health care.”
- Expand workplace policies, including “paid parental, medical, and sick leave” and “access to childcare (in the community or on-site)”.
Unsurprisingly, most of the solutions call for more government intervention and lots more childcare. (Sorry, but universal preschool has not been shown to improve the situation of the majority of children or their parents.) We will never fix the problem by encouraging less family unity and more government “help” that comes at the cost of higher taxes.
Join Mercator today for free and get our latest news and analysis
Buck internet censorship and get the news you may not get anywhere else, delivered right to your inbox. It's free and your info is safe with us, we will never share or sell your personal data.
There doesn’t seem to be acknowledgment in the Surgeon General’s Advisory that the separation of parents and children for most of the waking hours of every day and the reality of both parents focusing most of their time and efforts outside the home may be contributing to the very problem they’re trying to solve: the widespread breakdown of the mental health and happiness of both children and their parents.
The advisory does have some solid suggestions that deserve kudos. For instance, it urges friends and family members to offer practical support to parents, including “lending assistance with household chores, childcare responsibilities, or running errands” and “looking for ways to support parents and caregivers so they can take breaks, attend needed appointments, and engage in self-care activities.” Bravo.
Humble solutions
Here are some additional suggestions for policymakers and individuals:
- Live near family. Grandparents and others can offer vital support. Studies show that living near grandparents can benefit children, parents, and grandparents.
- Ease parents’ financial burdens by lowering taxes; do this by eliminating social programs, not increasing or expanding them. Largely let families solve their own problems with their own money.
- Cultivate an economy in which one parent can primarily support the family financially, and one parent can primarily focus on the physical and emotional needs of their children.
- Spend more time and effort preparing children for parenthood. Cultivate selflessness, sacrifice, and responsibility in children (Hint: Large families often foster this.)
- Limit time spent on electronic devices for both parents and children (for more vital information on this, see my articles here and here.)
- Revitalise THE NEIGHBOURHOOD. Initiate simple neighbourhood gatherings to get to know the people around you. Use social media neighbourhood groups to support each other, like offering to pick up a gallon of milk, etc., for the family next door.
- Don’t wait for the government to save you. If you are overstressed — as I was at one time when my kids were young — ask another parent to swap babysitting with you every week (or as often as needed.) Doing this reduced my stress level significantly.
- Reconsider and revise your priorities. If work has become more dominant than home life, or if your life is overrun with too much to do, simplify and sacrifice in order to focus on what matters most to you.
Despite the often chaotic and stressful nature of parenting, most parents see their children as a deep and satisfying source of joy — despite the pain. There is work and struggle in parenthood. That’s part of what you sign up for when you decide to welcome a helpless person into your life.
But you also sign up for a life of purpose and boundless adventure beyond what you could have imagined. And almost all parents rise to the occasion. They embrace the adventure of raising a family, and it gives them both daily and lifelong purpose. At the end of the day — and at the end of their lives — most parents consider themselves better off rather than worse off for having embarked on the irreplaceable adventure of becoming parents.
What do you make of the US Surgeon General's advisory? Leave your thoughts below.
Kimberly Ells is the author of The Invincible Family. Follow her at Invincible Family Substack.
Image credit: Pexels
Have your say!
Join Mercator and post your comments.
-
David Young commented 2024-09-09 17:01:35 +1000@Paul Bunyon. Maybe you have a point. Aside from love parents also need common sense. My friend has it. He and his wife knew that 2 was enough in their circumstances. And you are right that the more children, the more they will need some kind of support – maybe government support. But it is productive people and organisations who pay taxes that fund the government and you want these taxes to now support the unproductive people who can’t afford too many children to be paid to have more children who will likely grow up to have children that they cannot afford to support. There isn’t a happy ending to ‘government support’ and in Africa governments tend to support the insatiable needs of the leadership, not the people with many children
-
mrscracker commented 2024-09-09 02:38:38 +1000Very true Mr Young. Most of what we hear about are First World troubles.
-
Paul Bunyan commented 2024-09-09 01:04:43 +1000Unfortunately, Mr Young, your naive outlook on parenting isn’t helpful.
Love doesn’t fill bellies. The more children a couple has, the more likely they are to depend on government support.
Love is essential for children, of course. But love isn’t enough to raise a family. Besides, with over 140 million orphans waiting for loving families, adoption should be promoted as a first option for people who want to raise children, not as a last resort.
And please don’t point to Elon Musk as an example of a good parent. He’s terrible. He hires nannies to look after his children and spends almost no time with them, -
David Young commented 2024-09-09 00:21:23 +1000You softies in the Western culture need to know: try parenting in Israel or Gaza or Sudan, or Ukraine or in the country where I live; Zimbabwe. It’s a much tougher ask of parents. Some do it well and some don’t. Just like has happened anywhere throughout history. I have a good friend here who, with his good wife and mother, managed to get their son and daughter through their early years and then through university. I remember him telling me how there were times when there was no bread on the table amongst many other shortages of not the nice to have but the have to have. But he and his wife did it because the one ‘have to have’ was never missing: They loved their children. Today those children are healthy and happy and making a contribution to society. Once you start giving handouts to parents for having children, parents will start to accept them, then need them, then expect more, then demand more. All you need as a parent is love.
-
Susan Rohrbach commented 2024-09-06 22:24:04 +1000We must fault no fault divorce. When marriage can fail, women are less likely to invest a portion of their lives into raising children. Society must have the back of “till death do us part”.
-
Patrick Obrien commented 2024-09-06 21:47:35 +1000It took the nanny-state government to tell us the obvious. Heck, getting out of bed in the morning is a health hazard.
-
Steven Meyer commented 2024-09-05 14:53:09 +1000It’s not always a bed of roses. One of my grandmothers had a sister who married into a very wealthy family. My grandmother’s husband, my grandfather, was a successful businessman in a modest sort of way. My grandmother never lacked for anything once he got established after fleeing the Nazis.
But my grandmother became eaten up with envy at her sister. As she grew older she became ever more bitter and spiteful.
When she died aged 94 I broke the news to her sister. Her response:
A few tears and “Jetzt hat sie Ruhe” (Now she has peace)
So it goes. -
mrscracker commented 2024-09-04 22:35:06 +1000I’m glad you agree about the importance of having family nearby, Mr. Steven. Having grandparents to help out is a real blessing. I’ve read that may be a part of the reason behind the heather birthrate in the Faroe Islands. Many grandparents there are within walking distance.
-
mrscracker commented 2024-09-04 22:31:57 +1000Mr Bunyan, Dr. Murthy is married and has children.
-
Paul Bunyan commented 2024-09-04 22:08:46 +1000Dr Murphy did something extremely brave and extremely necessary. Society is already inundated with pro-natal messages. Almost every TV show features a happy family.
A detailed look at the negative side of parenting is long overdue. -
Steven Meyer commented 2024-09-04 21:23:18 +1000mrscracker, agreed, Living near family is great. My kids and I have been fortunate in that respect.
But, sometimes, it’s not feasible.
I admire Dr Murthy for having the courage to post this advisory.
The response from Kimberley Ells is what I would expect from so-called conservative Christians. I’m sure Dr Murthy expected it as well.
Interesting that when a corrupt wannabe Mussolini like Victor Orban has his government interfere massively, if ineffectually, to assist families conservative Christians on this site applaud him.
When an influential official in a (somewhat) democratic country raises real issues about child and parental welfare the reaction of those same conservative Christians is mockery and attack, attack, attack.
And contradict themselves in the attack.
I would be interested to see Kimberly Ellis defend the tone of this piece. -
mrscracker commented 2024-09-04 19:20:26 +1000Living near family is definitely important.
I didn’t see promoting marriage on that government laundry list. That’s where it should begin. -
Steven Meyer commented 2024-09-04 17:47:49 +1000Let me see:
“Don’t wait for the government to save you”
versus
“Cultivate an economy in which one parent can primarily support the family financially”
How exactly do you think you can do that without government intervention? Rely on the kindness of the CEOs of oligopolistic corporations perhaps?
“Ease parents’ financial burdens by lowering taxes”
My understanding is this is precisely what the never-to-be-sufficiently-damned Kamal Harris advocates. It’s the good Christians in the Republican party who are blocking it.
“Revitalise THE NEIGHBOURHOOD”
Good luck with that in most contemporary urban settings. However, it’s worth a try. Trouble is, you may have reconsidered and revised your priorities but have your neighbours?
I remember being allowed to run off and play in parks and a nearby wood as a kid. Our kids were still able to do it.
So I went to some nearby parks to see what was going on. I was the only one in the parks. Even I felt a bit spooked. Would I let my kids run off by themselves to play in an empty park that spooked me?
If you want to change the culture you are going to need some help from the government. Instead of dismissing Dr. Murthy’s advisory and telling us about your own maternal heroism, why not try to work with it?
Dr Murthy is simply enunciating an unpleasant reality. In today’s circumstances raising children is more stressful than it’s been in past generations. Many people do not feel up to the task. And I don’t blame them.
The problem with most governments in developed countries is not that they are intrinsically evil but that they’ve been captured by corporate interests. Thinking you can bring about cultural change while leaving government in the hands of corporate interests is delusional. -