Yale and the Nanny State


Last October a group of Yale
freshmen pledging a fraternity made jackasses of themselves by marching around
the campus chanting a vulgar slur against women. Complaints poured in and the
university took action
. Several fraternity members were disciplined and Yale
banned the offending fraternity from all campus activities for five years,
saying “the actions were necessary to ensure an educational environment free of
harassment and intimidation”. Quite embarrassing for a prestigious institution
and the alma mater of two recent presidents (Bush 1 and Bush 2) and a close
contender (John Kerry).

was not enough, however. The federal government got wind of these campus hijinks. The US Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights has also launched an
“to review Yale’s policies for dealing with sexual harassment and
assault cases”. The Feds are coming after Yale under the flag of the 1972 Title
lX Act (20 United States Code Section 1681: “No person in the United States shall,
on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits
of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity
receiving Federal financial assistance.”

My experience with fraternities and sororities is limited. I
don’t recall ever encountering a member of either tribe during my undergraduate
days at a large university. I did, however, have a brush with fraternities toward
the end of my graduate studies at Stanford University. Being newly married and
on the outskirts of poverty, my wife and I accepted an offer to be “faculty
residents” for a freshmen dormitory of 90 boys, boys who had just escaped from
the horrendous oppression of their parents and their high school teachers. Their
newfound freedom quickly found expression in incredible slovenliness, loud
cursing, a few fist fights and the consumption of large quantities of brown
beverages. We still bear scars and invariably wince when we reflect on that near-Animal-Farm

One of the most upsetting events happened when our boys
returned from Christmas vacation and fraternity “rush week” began. The
fraternity “men” came around to pick over our boys and begin their recruitment
drive. Watching the process up close was heartbreaking. Many boys were not selected
and were instantly labeled as “rejects,” “losers”, along with several less
flattering tags. It was the first time most of these boys had faced rejection. To
say the least, many took it quite poorly.

Late one night, worried about what to do and angry at the
fraternity system, I asked my wife for advice. She had been very much a part of
the fraternity and sorority life at a big state university. While sympathetic
to the boys who lost out, she described her experience. Having been raised on a
farm and being away from home for the first time, sorority life had provided her
a haven in a huge and otherwise impersonal university campus. She described how
the rules and traditions provided structure and how important the friendship
and example of the older girls was. She thought that in the better fraternities
the same was true for the boys.

Clearly fraternities and sororities are like families, close
communities where the individuals are linked by bonds of loyalty and
friendship. And, like families, there are good ones and bad ones; families that
have good years and bad years; families that occasionally do noble things and
families that do incredibly stupid things. The offending Yale fraternity (a DKE
chapter, for those of you into the arcana of the fraternity-sorority world)
seems to have fallen into this last category. Fine. But why unleash a gaggle of
Washington lawyers on Yale? Why wheel in the investigatory and legal machinery
of the federal government of the United States?

It is not as if Yale University had ignored the crude and
offensive behavior of the students and a campus organization for which it was
responsible. The University punished individuals and banned the fraternity from
recruiting or engaging in activities on campus for five years.

This didn’t satisfy a small group of current and former
students, who pleaded for Washington to come in and straighten out the
situation. They are like children who, after parents have meted out punishment
to their siblings, run to the mayor and ask him or her to visit their home to impose

What is happening to the United States? Are we so silly that
whenever there is a perceived injustice, we take it to the highest authority? What
about petitioning Yale’s president? Or asking the Faculty Senate or the
university’s Board of Trustees to see that justice be done? Or the powerful
Yale Alumni Association? Or the state of Connecticut which grants Yale its
charter? What is this childish obsession with the federal government?

And do not Americans have to scratch our collective heads at
a government that takes up such a case and send its lawyers to New Haven to
hold hearings, take testimony and arrange depositions? Are there not more
worthy issues or even more dire problems confronting the federal government? Are
we so rich in 2011 that we are ready to spend several hundreds of thousands to
get to the bottom of the rude chanting of some frat boy wannabees? Or is this
just one more example of a bloated, out-of-control government bureaucracy
taking over the responsibilities of an increasingly infantilized citizenry?

Kevin Ryan founded the Center for the Advancement of Ethics and
Character at Boston University, where he is professor emeritus. He has written
and edited 20 books. He has appeared on CBS's "This Morning", ABC's "Good
Morning America", "The O’Reilly Factor", CNN and the Public
Broadcasting System speaking on character education. He can be reached at
[email protected]


Join Mercator today for free and get our latest news and analysis

Buck internet censorship and get the news you may not get anywhere else, delivered right to your inbox. It's free and your info is safe with us, we will never share or sell your personal data.

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.