- Free newsletter
- The Latest
- Topics
-
About
‘The pride police’ know how to use their truncheons
Last week, the Human Rights Tribunal (HRT) of Ontario ruled that the township of Emo in the far west of Ontario, Canada be fined C$10 000 for refusing to celebrate Pride Month. Its officials have also been ordered to complete mandatory “human rights” training.
The HRT claims that Emo, home to a population of a mere 1,300 people, violated the Ontario Human Rights Code and failed to fly “an LGBTQ2 rainbow flag,” despite the fact that the township doesn’t have an official flagpole.
Emo’s mayor, Harold McQuaker, allegedly said at a councillors’ meeting where the rainbow flag was discussed, “There’s no flag being flown for the other side of the coin … there’s no flags being flown for the straight people.”
HRT vice-chair Karen Dawson said that McQuaker’s comment was discriminatory: “I find this remark was demeaning and disparaging of the LGBTQ2 community … and therefore constituted discrimination under the Code.”
Where have we come to?
I was a gay activist in London in the 80s and engaged in discussions which shaped The Gay Agenda. (Yes, it does exist, and it is nearing fulfilment, which includes overturning heteronormativity once and for all.)
One major aspect of the plan includes using psychological warfare to silence and ultimately convert any person who might fail not merely to tolerate but to celebrate homosexuality and sexual deviancy. This would involve singling out antagonists or groups who fail to comply by using humiliation, the sullying of character, financial hardship and social exclusion.
Ontario’s HRT ordered Emo to pay a fine of $10,000 to the local 2SLGBTQIA+ Pride organization, Borderland Pride, and for McQuaker to personally pay them another $5,000.
These fines were lower than what Borderland Pride had originally sought. They wanted $15,000 from the township as a whole (approximately $11.50 from every man, woman and child) and an additional $30,000 – $10,000 from each of the three councillors who voted against the flying of a LGBTQ2 rainbow flag.
Borderland Pride promised to return one-third of the financial reward to the Emo Public Library, as long as the library hosted a “drag story time event” on a “date of our choosing.”
The online re-education course McQuaker is now required to complete by law, known as Human Rights 101, is offered by the Ontario Human Rights Commission. McQuaker is to “provide proof of completion … to Borderland Pride within 30 days.” Yes, he doesn’t need to report to the Commissioner but rather to his accusers.
The latest edition of the course opens with an animated video telling viewers that the Human Rights Code “is not meant to punish,” and that “it doesn’t matter if you didn’t intend or mean to discriminate … it’s the impact on the person that matters.” [my highlight]
Wasn’t McQuaker making this exact point when he pointed out that no flag was being flown for the straight people?
Join Mercator today for free and get our latest news and analysis
Buck internet censorship and get the news you may not get anywhere else, delivered right to your inbox. It's free and your info is safe with us, we will never share or sell your personal data.
Pride in Australian beaches
Last summer, I arranged a social gathering at Coogee beach in Western Australia, regarded as one of Australia’s best 15 beaches. The gathering was made up of members of the peer-support network I facilitate for victim-survivors of childhood sexual abuse and adult sexual assault called the Survivors Support Network Australia.
The beach can be a challenging and yet healing place for survivors of sexual duress, and anyone struggling to overcome past trauma. It is a place where exposure of the body can be accepted without question or threat, and where a survivor can begin to heal through engagement with the softness of the sand and the movement of the ocean waters. Coogee beach is a favourite among survivors.
However, Coogee Beach Surf Life Saving Club took it upon itself last summer, as have other Australian surf clubs, to adopt a national Surf Lifesaving program created by Lifesavers with Pride which demands that the pride flag be imprinted as chevrons on the fins of its rescue boards which lie erect in full view of visitors to local beaches.
Some of our support network’s members, of whom over 50 percent identity as LGBTQ, have been sexually assaulted as children or as adults by others who identify as LGBTQ. A few of our LGBTQ members are triggered by the Pride flag and can quickly regress back into a place of relived trauma.
I wrote to the President of the Coogee Beach Surf Life Saving Club highlighting that the rainbow chevron on rescue boards, which evidently signify Diversity, Equity and Inclusion for those in the LGBTQ community, was retraumatising some of the most vulnerable members of that very same community.
The flag has now come to symbolise Discrimination, Exclusion (particularly in its disregard for certain LGBTQ trauma victims) and Intolerance.
I pointed out that this exclusionary action by LGBTQ Lifesavers across Australia’s key beaches was denying the opportunity for some of the LGBTQ community’s most vulnerable citizens to heal and recover from trauma.
The CEO, Adam Weir, responded saying, “The SLSA Inclusion and Diversity Statement is a public commitment that everyone should feel safe and welcome on Australia’s beaches” [my highlight]. He ignored my complaint.
The President, Michael Rees, responded saying, “I hope that your members can understand that at Surf Lifesaving our mission is to make the beach a safe place for all persons, ethnicities and genders.” [my highlight]
Well, no, members of the Survivors’ Support Network Australia don’t understand why Surf Lifesaving is ignoring complex trauma of society’s most vulnerable and making public beaches unsafe places.
To add fuel to the fire, Rees then stated, “Although some in the community may view the rainbow chevron on the rescue boards as a symbol of inclusion for a particular group, we believe it represents a broader statement of inclusion for all groups and helps to overtly display that the club is welcoming of people from all different cultures, religions and abilities.”
Since when did the LGBTQ2 rainbow flag qualify to include all people when many Australian immigrants, religious bodies and diversely abled people stand opposed to what they see as a socially divisive flag?
McQuaker’s single phrase in Emo, and survivors’ heartfelt request to rid Coogee beach from rainbow chevrons, show that deliberate exclusion is at work.
The Pride flag is divisive
The Pride flag is being used to divide and hurt communities.
This is causing the average LGBTQ identifying person to be looked at with greater suspicion, which no decent person wants to happen. But what is the alternative when cruel totalitarian, or ‘totalitolerant’, policies are created, and inflexibly upheld by insensitive people?
Even the most broken and vulnerable members of the LGBTQ community are today being sacrificed and their needs disregarded so as to further The Gay Agenda.
Hypocrisy and bigotry are indeed alive and well and are being forced upon Western societies by oppressors who themselves claim to be the most oppressed.
Not long ago, the Babylon Bee, released a five-minute satirical video for Pride Month 2024.
‘Meet the Pride Police’ may have been intended as humour but for many people it hits too close to home and mirrors the stories above.
The 4,000+ comments beneath the video show an increasing ire across the globe to the intolerant demands now being forced upon societies by LGBTQ+ organisations.
The final words should be given to two of the video’s commentators whose words are shared by LGBTQ victim-survivors of childhood sexual abuse and adult sexual assault:
- “I am a gay man and I agree 100%... This gay celebration crap has gone too far. It offends me. Live your life. Be who you are but don't preach what you are not going to follow. At the end God will determine my fate. I am ready for that but along the way I will not push my beliefs upon others.”
- “I'm a lesbian and I totally agree the gay mafia has gotten way out of control. We used to want equality under the law. That's all. We didn't demand that everyone approved of how we live. The younger generation (whose terms and titles I don't understand and suspect many of which aren't even gay or lesbian) has become a gang of absolute tyrants. I think most rational vintage gays/lesbians see how ridiculous this is. And I think many of us are annoyed that these young they/ thems are unraveling [sic] the progress we made.”
Forward this to your friends
James Parker is a former gay activist and abuse survivor who supports people and their loved ones around sexuality, gender and identity.
Image credit: Bigstock
Have your say!
Join Mercator and post your comments.
-
Malcolm McLean commented 2024-12-07 22:51:54 +1100Most people will have an incident in their lives where they feel a degree of attraction to someone of the same sex. Normally it stays at that. An incident that doesn’t go anywhere. However occasionally one incident leads to another, until with several incidents of feeling and responding to same sex attraction in their lives, the person identifies themselves as having a homosexual orientation. It’s very rare that someone does not have the ability to control whether they engage in sexual activity or not.
-
Paul Bunyan commented 2024-12-07 08:48:02 +1100Anon Emouse – perhaps it’s his subtle way of conceding that sexual orientation is not a choice. It’s a step in the right direction, even if it is veiled in vitriol and hate.
-
Anon Emouse commented 2024-12-07 06:54:28 +1100I’m guessing that he’s not going to answer, Emberson.
What did James say? “Hypocrisy and bigotry are indeed alive and well”
Given his previous comments…
“ no sane person chooses to be erotically attracted to their same sex”
And that he wants to stigmatize “the practice of homosexuality”
I think his silence in response to that question is loud enough. -
Emberson Fedders commented 2024-12-06 00:46:52 +1100Are you going to answer Anon Emouse’s question, James?
-
Emberson Fedders commented 2024-12-05 11:33:49 +1100Good point, Anon Emouse. Those victims would number in the thousands.
-
Anon Emouse commented 2024-12-05 01:23:52 +1100I wonder if someone was triggered by images of a cross (say, someone who was molested by a priest) – would you call for the removal of crosses from the outside of churches, so as to avoid triggering people?
-
Emberson Fedders commented 2024-12-04 11:06:59 +1100You can’t ask for something to be banned just because someone doesn’t like it (or is triggered by it). That is a path with no end.
-
mrscracker commented 2024-12-04 04:10:36 +1100“Yes we need to get rid of all the flags. "
*********
I think Mr. Malcolm has the best idea.
:) -
Anon Emouse commented 2024-12-03 23:24:52 +1100Ah yes, James, the same man who could not give me a straight (no pun intended) yes or no answer as to whether or not homosexuality should be stigmatized in public life. (Hint: the answer is no).
-
Paul Bunyan commented 2024-12-03 22:13:11 +1100If they were raising Nazi flags or flags from the US Confederacy, that would be one thing. Those are clearly meant to intimidate and are thinly-veiled threats of terrorism, violence and oppression.
The rainbow flag is not threatening or intimidating in any way. -
Louisa Jean Elliott followed this page 2024-12-03 21:53:24 +1100
-
James Parker commented 2024-12-03 19:15:53 +1100Emberson,
We are talking about a PUBLIC beach where the human body can feel vulnerable and can heal.
If you understand one iota of trauma, you’ll know that anything which is triggering from the original trauma setting can pull a person back into the original trauma.
If you’ve never been into a gay club – and I’ve been in many – then you won’t realise how many drugs are taken and how much sexual pressure is placed upon some individuals, sometimes without their consent in a setting laden with rainbow flags.
To ENTER the beach you have to pass the Surf Lifesavers and their rainbow finned boards where the rainbow conservatively measures between 90cm x 150cm (hardly 10cm x 5cm, mate!).
It’s blatantly in your face and can’t be missed.
Some of our network members have to avoid shopping at Coles supermarket throughout June because of pride banners and bunting for the same reason. They won’t / can’t fly Qantas for the same reason. (Yes, the Queer airline triggers trauma in fellow queers. This is the point I’m trying to make.)
No one is attempting to shut down queer spaces, but as the two end quotations clearly state from a self-identifying gay and a lesbian, we need to stop designating everything and everywhere as a branding opportunity for LGBTQ propaganda, especially when this is now harming the most vulnerable members of the LGBTQ community, not to mention how others feel about this non-consensual behaviour. -
Malcolm McLean commented 2024-12-03 18:43:10 +1100Yes we need to get rid of all the flags. People who have suffered because of sexual perversion are offended by them. Whereever this sort of material is seen, it should be ripped down.
-
Emberson Fedders commented 2024-12-03 18:02:21 +1100It is tragic that these people are being triggered by seeing a flag, it really is, but they don’t have the right to have them removed. Perhaps there is somewhere else on the beach you can take them so they won’t see the flag? I mean, it’s on the fin of a surfboard, it’s what, 10cmx5cm?
And what happens when the people you work with see Pride flags elsewhere in the community (which very conceivably will happen)? Should we get rid of all the flags? -
Malcolm McLean commented 2024-12-03 16:57:14 +1100We just haven’t resisted. And now this.
-
James Parker commented 2024-12-03 16:08:38 +1100Emberson,
I personally am not triggered in the slightest by rainbow fins on surf rescue boards and therefore don’t have a problem with them, as I’m sure many don’t.
However, when vulnerable victim- survivors who themselves are gay, lesbian or trans are triggered and retraumatised by these fins, then I will stand up for these individuals whose lives are already an utter mess. They pay taxes too and have a right to be welcome on Aussie beaches and to feel SAFE — but they don’t feel safe, and those who preach “safety for all” don’t seem to care.
Why should one sector of the LGBTQ community be permitted to have unlimited power over, and lack any consideration for, others of the same community whilst promoting themselves as an oppressed community? It is a paradox and is blatant hypocrisy, and it needs calling out for what it is. -
Emberson Fedders commented 2024-12-03 15:49:07 +1100A few points here.
I agree that fining a town for not celebrating Pride Month is an egregious over-reach by the government and is extremely counter-productive. NOT doing something can hardly be punishable by fines.
This line, however – “I was a gay activist in London in the 80s and engaged in discussions which shaped The Gay Agenda. (Yes, it does exist, and it is nearing fulfilment, which includes overturning heteronormativity once and for all.)” – is absolutely ridiculous, and rather undermines other points in this article.
Coogee Beach Surf Living Club has every right to display pride flags on the fins of their boards if they want to. If you are offended by this, that is really on you. To demand they be removed would be rather hypocritical. -