- The Latest
- Topics
-
About
On Trump’s shutdown of USAID
On paper, USAID (the United States Agency for International Development) is an aid agency — one of the largest in the world, which delivers some US$50 billion annually through missions located in over 100 developing nations.
In practice, USAID funds censorship initiatives, foreign coups, radical left-wing causes and preposterously wasteful ventures the world over.
It is on this pretext, at least, that USAID is in the process of being shuttered by the Trump administration. As reported by the Associated Press:
USAID staffers said more than 600 additional employees had reported being locked out of the agency’s computer systems overnight. Those still in the system received emails saying that “at the direction of Agency leadership” the headquarters building “will be closed to Agency personnel on Monday, Feb. 3.” The agency’s website vanished Saturday without explanation.
In the days since, Trump and his team have appointed Secretary of State Marco Rubio as Acting Director of USAID, placed virtually all personnel globally on administrative leave, and ordered all USAID missions overseas to shut down by Friday.
In justifying the agency’s mothballing, Rubio told reporters Tuesday that his frustrations with USAID go back to his time in Congress. “It’s a completely unresponsive agency,” he explained. “It’s supposed to respond to policy directives of the state department and it refuses to do so.” Rubio continued:
Every dollar we spend will be aligned with the national interest of the United States. USAID has a history of ignoring that and deciding that they’re a global charity. These are not donor dollars, these are taxpayer dollars. We owe the American people assurances that every dollar we are spending abroad is being spent on something that furthers our national interest.
The shutdown of USAID has been met with fierce resistance from staff and Democratic lawmakers alike. Another AP report revealed that two top security chiefs at the agency refused to cooperate with DOGE inspection teams sent in at President Trump’s behest. Dozens of employees staged a protest on Monday and have since been joined by members of Congress. Democrats and the media (though I repeat myself) have variously described this week’s events as a “hostile takeover”, an “illegal power grab”, and a “constitutional crisis”.
It is, of course, none of the above.
USAID was created by JFK in 1961, largely via executive order. As the duly elected head of the executive branch — and with a popular-vote mandate to boot — Trump and his appointees have jurisdiction over the agency and have acted lawfully this week, even if they have upset the apple cart. More importantly perhaps, by winding back USAID, Trump is delivering on his pre-election promise to rein in wasteful spending — and to use Elon Musk to do it.
So, what of the claims of wokeness, waste and wrongdoing?
USAID’s rabid support of abortion, DEI and LGBT politics are already well documented. By the by, this might help explain why 97 percent of all political contributions from USAID employees went to Democrat candidates. But it’s the scale of spending on wokery that is truly eye-watering.
In addition to spending $520 million on ESG consultants and $375 million in DEI grants, USAID has given $15 million for condoms to the Taliban, $3.3 million towards “being LGBTQ in the Caribbean”, $1.5 million to promote job opportunities for LGBTQ individuals in Serbia, $2 million for sex changes and “LGBT activism” in Guatemala, and $425,622 to help Indonesian coffee companies become more climate and gender friendly.
🧵From funneling tax dollars to risky research in Wuhan to sending Ukrainians to Paris Fashion Week, USAID is one of the worst offenders of waste in Washington… all around the world. 🌎
— Joni Ernst (@SenJoniErnst) February 3, 2025
This is why @POTUS, @DOGE, and @elonmusk are ending the nonsense. 👇
USAID’s apolitical wastefulness is just as bad. According to one internet sleuth who troweled through a lengthy ProPublica report:
USAID spent $335 million on a diesel fueled power plant that just sat there because Afghans can’t afford to import diesel. $300-500 million on a dam that was deemed too unsafe to use. $250 million on a partial road that deteriorated. Millions on healthcare facilities that don’t exist. $70 million on contractor fees for projects that were canceled before being started, but they got to keep the money anyway.
“Zero consequences for not delivering,” he summarised. “Given more money every year. And this is just Afghanistan to 2015.”
In one of the most egregious examples, as reported by Breitbart, US officials discovered that USAID had spent at least $330 million on “irrigation canals, farming equipment, and even fertilizer used to support the unprecedented poppy cultivation and heroin production in Afghanistan mainly benefiting Taliban narco-jihadists”.
Notoriously, USAID funnelled almost $1 million to coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which the CIA has since conceded was the likely source of COVID-19.
And, as recently highlighted by Unherd, USAID has been a major supporter of internet censorship — under the guise of combatting “misinformation” and “disinformation”, of course.
Then there are the foreign coups that have been aided and abetted with the help of USAID funding — including secretly creating a “Cuban Twitter” to foment unrest and trigger a Cuban spring, bankrolling opposition groups in Venezuela seeking to overthrow Hugo Chávez and Nicolás Maduro, funding separatist movements in Bolivia aimed at unseating President Evo Morales, and much, much more. In sum, these efforts have put USAID on the back foot against allegations it is a CIA front — an assessment I’ll happily let others make.
At best, USAID has devolved over the years from foreign aid into a foreign slush fund for wokery and censorship. At worst, it is a money laundering scheme used to enrich activists and enact globally what Congress has forbidden on US soil.
Either way, after years of attempted reforms, the Trump outfit is smart to turn off the funding tap before — not after — investigating all the apparent fraud and pork barrelling.
When all is said and done, perhaps Trump’s legacy won’t just be making America great again, but making foreign aid great again too.
Do you share Marco Rubio’s suspicions about USAID?
Kurt Mahlburg is a writer and author, and an emerging Australian voice on culture and the Christian faith. He has a passion for both the philosophical and the personal, drawing on his background as a graduate architect, a primary school teacher, a missionary, and a young adult pastor.
Image credit: screenshot Global News
Have your say!
Join Mercator and post your comments.
-
Anon Emouse commented 2025-02-10 04:36:12 +1100John Joseph should have vote for Biden (who lowered the defect) instead of trump (who exploded the deficit) if he were concerned about debt
-
Emberson Fedders commented 2025-02-09 13:49:06 +1100John Joseph is worried about the debt. So why on earth would the last Trump administration cut taxes to the wealthiest Americans?? Surely that money could be used to pay down the debt?
-
Emberson Fedders commented 2025-02-09 13:47:02 +1100“Sometimes you have to put the brakes on so you can make the repairs needed & get the vehicle back on the road.”
I admire your faith in this administration, Mrs Cracker, but I think we can safely assume that USAID has been closed for ever.
On another note, I see that Trump has now cut $4 billion to the National Institutes of Health.
MAGA, apparently… -
John Joseph commented 2025-02-09 00:12:50 +1100All the commentators complaining about Trump and Musk carrying out unconstitutional acts totally crack me up. The US is in debt to the tune of close to 100% of GDP – that’s banana republic territory. If the US was a registered corporation you’d sell your shares and demand that the directors be investigated for malfeasance! Go check out the US national debt clock https://www.usdebtclock.org/ The debt is now over $36 TRILLION! Notice too how the US debt clock also now includes a DOGE clock, showing how much is being saved by DOGE activities.
The US is so deeply in debt it can no longer afford to be sending money abroad to fund condom programs, or any other program, nefarious or benevolent, that costs big money.
Today, I read that USAID has been totally kicked out of its building, all signage has been removed and ICE has moved in! Take that big spenders! -
Andrew Mayo commented 2025-02-08 22:07:01 +1100Jurgen, I am not an expert here and am happy to be corrected. I was reacting to a tendency for Christian journalists – and I assure you I have nothing against Kurt and benefit from many of his articles – to pick out extremist statements or aspects, that do not give a fair whole pucture.
-
Jürgen Siemer commented 2025-02-08 21:25:30 +1100Dear Andrew, there is a UN organization called World Food Programme in Rome, whose sole mission is to organize emergency food deliveries. It is headed by a US citizen.
Is it not probably more efficient to use the WFP instead of having additional national emergency food delivery system with their own logistics and administrative overheads?
Well, the USAid now looks like a CIA Operation disguised as an aid operation.
Looks like, because we will never know the details. Those are hidden. But we have reason to be suspicious.
I doubt that you have some insight into the budget, the real budget of USAid. -
mrscracker commented 2025-02-08 05:44:15 +1100Mr. Mayo, most Americans approve of sending aid to famine victims & refugees even if some of that is pilfered by corrupt interests abroad. But diverting funds meant to feed the hungry is not something we should sweep under the rug. Sometimes you have to put the brakes on so you can make the repairs needed & get the vehicle back on the road.
-
Jürgen Siemer commented 2025-02-08 04:42:30 +1100You Americans should be proud, since the weed of corruption gets rooted out, finally.
Here in Europe, the corruption is not stopped: taxes are used widely, usually through so-called NGOs and government financed think tanks and radio and TB stations, to influence voters, always with the aim of protecting the ruling lefties
We now have a digital services act, which is simply censorship. -
Andrew Mayo commented 2025-02-08 01:08:16 +1100Like all such agencies USAID has a leftish ideology and does allocate some funds to projects we would. Not approve of. But the amount involbpved is insignificant compared to all the vital work they do looking after the needy. Shame on Mercator for their indscriminate support for the crass and unchristian destruction led by Elon .Musk.
-
Marty Hayden commented 2025-02-07 23:57:17 +1100Trump was right to shut down USAID. We need to rebuild our outreach efforts from the ground up.
-
Jürgen Siemer commented 2025-02-07 22:28:11 +1100USAid has now been confirmed to a) have been running CIA-operations with the aim of removing foreign governments and b) to have been co-financing the Wuhan lab in China. Remember, that this Chinese lab received us- funds to circumvent us-legal restrictions on gain of function research. Not clear if USAid was financing that spefic program in Wuhan, but will we ever know for sure?
There are also allegations that the USAid has financed a Chinese military medical research lab, too.
Looks like the CIA used the UDAid to cover their own tracks!
It is therefore right to close the CIA and the USAid. Nobody needs them! – except those people in the shadows who captured the US government in the past.
Yes, closing the CIA and the USAid plus other intelligence agencies should be seen as an important move for the US citizens to regain control of their government and to protect their freedom and personal liberties! -
Emberson Fedders commented 2025-02-07 10:27:00 +1100I think you’ll find, Mr Emouse, that Kurt doesn’t CARE about American civics and the separation of powers laid out by the constitution. He is a performative constitutionalist, just like he is a performative Christian.
-
mrscracker commented 2025-02-07 03:34:17 +1100Thank you for sharing this. Most folks where we live are very supportive of cutting out waste & agenda from this agency so that one day it might be able to resume its legitimate purpose.
-
Anon Emouse commented 2025-02-06 23:48:54 +1100Like, I am legitimately baffled how you chose to downplay what’s going on, Kurt.
Congress designated that money, as is their constitutional duty. The executive branch doesn’t all of a sudden get to cancel those payments, anymore than Trump tried to withhold Ukraine aid in his first term (for which he was rightfully impeached).
Please tell me you’re back in Australia, Kurt – I really hope you’re not voting in any US elections with such a fundamental misunderstanding of American civics and separation of powers as laid out in the constitution. -
Anon Emouse commented 2025-02-06 23:10:54 +1100Kurt,
Executive branch doesn’t have power of the purse, and nothing Trump is doing is Constitutional. The fact that you ares supportive of this says a lot about you -
Emberson Fedders commented 2025-02-06 11:09:54 +1100Of course, it also supplies basic food and medication to tens of thousands of desperately poor people across the planet, but as Jesus would say, “Who cares about them?”
Trump also pushing up the US unemployment rate. -