Sooner or later, babies will be too precious to abort

In November last year French TV channel CNews was fined €100,000 (US$103,000) for stating that abortion is the leading cause of death worldwide.

The fine was imposed by the French media regulatory body Arcom after a CNews journalist made a reprehensible assertion on in February 2024 on its program "En quête d'esprit" (“In Search of Spirit”). In a discussion amongst several women about the psychological consequences of abortion, presenter Aymeric Pourbaix said that abortion was killing babies. All hell broke loose amongst the bien-pensants of the Twitterverse.

Well, that's not exactly what Pourbaix said. He simply displayed an infographic based on Worldometer, which had drawn its figures from World Health Organization statistics. These showed that abortions account for 73 million deaths globally each year, compared to 10 million from cancer, and 6.2 million from smoking.

The infographic appeared for about 15 seconds. But they were 15 seconds of hellish torment for the bien-pensants. The response to the program was visceral – “nauseating and deeply offensive”, “simply unacceptable”, CNews should be nuked, and so on. It was denounced in the National Assembly.

 

icon

Join Mercator today for free and get our latest news and analysis

Buck internet censorship and get the news you may not get anywhere else, delivered right to your inbox. It's free and your info is safe with us, we will never share or sell your personal data.

According to Arcom’s ruling, CNews failed in its “obligation of honesty and rigour in the presentation and processing of information.” Abortion could not be described as a cause of death, since that would imply that abortion was murder. To assert that a foetus was a person is “manifestly inaccurate”. CNews was peddling misinformation. 

CNews is a Catholic channel owned by Catholic billionaire Vincent Bolloré. It was forced to issue a grovelling apology.

But who is the real misinformation villain? Jean-Marie Le Méné, president of the pro-life group, Fondation Jérôme Lejeune, described Arcom’s ruling as Orwellian nonsense:

“Indeed, equating an aborted child to a death would make abortion murder. To make it possible to practice it with a clear conscience, it is therefore forbidden to say that abortion takes a life. Otherwise the keystone of the system collapses. Abortion must remain harmless. But who believes in this fiction?”

Further, wrote Le Méné, the decision amounts to censorship: “Transforming a verified fact into a disputed opinion, susceptible to repression, leads to a consequence: omertá.”

Well, so that Mercator won’t be fined in France, let’s describe abortion as the “cessation of a potential human life”. That’s OK, isn’t it? How else can you describe it?

The best available statistics from the World Health Organization show that abortion is far and away the biggest cessator of human life, whether or not it is legal.

The latest year for which data is reasonably complete is 2021. That year there were about 68 million deaths in the world, according to WHO. The leading causes of mortality were:

  • Heart disease (9 million)
  • COVID-19 (8.7 million)
  • Stroke (6.9 million)
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3.5 million)
  • Lower respiratory infections (2.4 million)
  • Trachea, bronchus, lung cancers (1.8 million)
  • Alzheimer’s and other dementias (1.8 million)
  • Diabetes mellitus (1.6 million)
  • Kidney diseases (1.4 million)
  • Tuberculosis (1.3 million)

Also in that year there were about 73 million induced abortions worldwide according to the WHO.

So not only is abortion the leading cessator of human life globally, it accounts for more than all other cessators of human life combined – about 52 percent of all cessations of human life every year. 

Is this just a debating point? A moment for pro-lifers to gasp with horror? No, it’s the reason why abortion will eventually be banned everywhere in the world.

Look at it this way. Around the world, most countries in the West and East Asia are being depopulated. Sooner or later, people will compare the decline in population to the number of abortions and conclude that this makes no sense at all. In a world where every baby is a wanted baby, abortion will be taboo. It will be stark, raving mad. Babies alway have been precious, but when the penny drops, they will be more precious than ever. 

Take Japan, as an example. In 2021 141,000 abortions were reported. In the same year, the population fell by 644,000.The Japanese government is desperate to raise the birthrate – lest Japan and Japanese be swept away by the winds of history. It is trying all sorts of schemes, from subsidized IVF to baby bonuses to increased maternal and paternal leave. Sooner or later people will ask themselves: why not discourage abortion?

Russia, where the population is falling off a cliff, is already restricting them. It hasn’t banned abortion – but it is discouraging it through government-funded campaigns.

Its media is full of pro-natal advertising. One ad features a young couple who receive a knock on the door one night from a cute little toddler, who tells them, “I am your happiness.” The woman lets her in despite her boyfriend objecting that “we are not planning for it.” She replies, “You can’t plan happiness, can you?”

In a few years’ time, mark my words, the media in France will be running similar campaigns.  


What do you think about the fine imposed on CNews by the French regulator?   


Michael Cook is editor of Mercator

Image credit: Bigstock


 

Showing 10 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Emberson Fedders
    commented 2025-02-04 14:38:02 +1100
    Yes, you are right Mrs Cracker. My bad on that one.
  • mrscracker
    Hello Mr. Fedders . Perhaps you are thinking rather of infanticide? Feticide is the killing of a fetus, a preborn child.
  • Emberson Fedders
    commented 2025-02-03 13:28:14 +1100
    “The only difference between a direct abortion and feticide has been whether the child was wanted or not.”

    No, an abortion is an abortion. Feticide is murdering a baby that has been born. Clearly, they are different things.

    And with Mr Bunyan, outside the US, no developed country will be outlawing abortion anytime soon.
  • Luis Howard
    commented 2025-02-01 17:22:56 +1100
    …deux choses:
    1. regarding the title, “Sooner or later, babies will be too precious to abort”
    BUT BABIES ARE RIGHT NOW TOO PRECIOUS TO ABORT!

    2. no, we think, guess, intuit, whatever, that the eventual return to sanity regarding human life will be due to a, somehow, return to morality, but not because the evil, immoral, putrid, sick, as such, failed—impossible, because evil and this being the principal evil in our days, will always existe…
  • Anon Emouse
    commented 2025-02-01 07:14:59 +1100
    Sooner or later children will be too precious to take away their free school lunches.
  • tori l
    commented 2025-02-01 04:08:08 +1100
    A lot of women who have abortions have kids after that (and before as well). Abortion affects the timing of having babies, not necessarily the quantity. Young women are the most fertile.
  • William Possidento
    commented 2025-02-01 01:59:18 +1100
    The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have stripped abortion from its leading causes of death ():

    The CDC reported 612,719 abortions in 2017 from “[s]elected reporting areas” (excluding California, Maryland, and New Hampshire) and 619,591 “legal induced abortions” from 49 reporting areas in 2018. Yet the CDC, in reporting that the “10 leading causes of death in 2018 remained the same as in 2017,” twice failed to identify direct (or “induced”) abortion as a leading cause of death. I have distilled the CDC’s leading causes of death data, which it based on the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision [ICD–10], into the following table:

    Rank Cause of death Number in 2017 Number in 2018
    – All causes 2,813,503 2,839,205
    1 Diseases of heart 647,457 655,381
    2 Malignant neoplasms 599,108 599,274
    3 Accidents (unintentional injuries) 169,936 167,127
    4 Chronic lower respiratory diseases 160,201 159,486
    5 Cerebrovascular diseases 146,383 147,810
    6 Alzheimer disease 121,404 122,019
    7 Diabetes mellitus 83,564 84,946
    8 Influenza and pneumonia 55,672 59,120
    9 Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis 50,633 51,386
    10 Intentional self-harm (suicide) 47,173 48,344
    – All other causes 731,972 744,312
    Table 1: 10 Leading causes of death in the USA in 2017 and 2018 according to the CDC.

    The 612,719 abortions in 2017 and 619,591 abortions in 2018 that the CDC reported should rank second – above cancer (malignant neoplasms) – among the ten leading causes of death that the CDC listed in both 2017 and 2018. And because the abortion data for both years captured only the abortions in 49 of 52 reporting areas and for other reasons (for example, illegal abortions) may have been further underreported, it is possible that direct abortion was the leading cause of death in the USA in 2017 and 2018. Yet the death tolls from abortion for both years are absent. (There is an additional complication: natural miscarriage almost certainly ranks among the leading causes, too, though it would be difficult to accurately quantify and is also missing from the CDC’s rankings.) Note something else striking: in January 2021 the Guttmacher Institute reported that “132,680 abortions were provided in California” and “[a]pproximately 862,320 abortions occurred in the United States” in 2017. Inserting that national datum from the Guttmacher Institute into the CDC table, direct abortion would rank above diseases of heart as the leading cause of death in 2017 (as I write, I do not find Guttmacher Institute data for 2018). The CDC’s publication of the leading causes of death for 2017 and 2018 rendered direct abortion invisible and was an exercise in exclusivity, not inclusivity.

    From: https://onepeterfive.com/abortion-exclusion-reality/
  • mrscracker
    Perhaps it would helpful to use legal terminology . I don’t know how the law reads in France but in our US state feticide has been a crime for a long time. I know the laws are similar in other US states.
    Abortion can refer either to a spontaneous miscarriage or a direct, intentional taking of the life of the fetus. The only difference between a direct abortion and feticide has been whether the child was wanted or not. It’s a shame that we selectively value human life that way.
  • Paul Bunyan
    commented 2025-01-31 22:09:26 +1100
    Oligarchs are the only ones who benefit from a large population. Interestingly, they’re also rich enough to pay others to raise their children for them. In doing so, they demonstrate and show very little love or empathy.

    We shouldn’t even be worrying about increasing the GDP or the population. Surely feats such as ending illiteracy, curing cancer and eliminating poverty are far more important.

    Aside from the US, no developed country is likely to outlaw abortion in the next 100 years.
  • Michael Cook
    published this page in The Latest 2025-01-31 17:06:59 +1100