- Free newsletter
- The Latest
- Topics
-
About
The ultimate Christmas present for Dutch kiddies: euthanasia!
December 17, 2004
1 Reaction
Merry Christmas! From the Netherlands, the country that brought you Santa Claus, comes the ultimate Christmas present, involuntary euthanasia for kids! Groningen Academic Hospital has asked the Dutch government to approve protocols for killing deformed and terminally ill children -- after admitting that it had already done this four times in the past year.
The leading figure in the push for "mercy killing" for children, Dr Eduard Verhagen, said that the number affected by the measure would be no more than about a dozen each year. The newborns he has in mind suffer "agonising pain", he said. "The parents watch this in tears and beg the doctor to bring an end to such suffering."(1) His press release failed to mention that the "Groningen protocols" would allow doctors to kill children up to the age of 12, not just infants.
Together with Dutch public prosecutors, Dr Verhagen and his colleagues have drawn up a list of five criteria: "the suffering must be so severe that the newborn has no prospects of a future; there is no possibility of a cure or alleviation with medication or surgery; the parents must always give their consent; a second opinion must be provided by an independent doctor who has not been involved with the child's treatment; and the deliberate ending of life must be meticulously carried out with the emphasis on aftercare."
Dutch doctors want to expand the boundaries of euthanasia to include adults who are sick and tired of living and not just sick.
Santa Claus came for Dutch grown-ups, too. In a separate development, the Dutch medical profession announced that it wants to expand the boundaries of euthanasia to include adults who are sick and tired of living and not just sick. Earlier this month, shortly after the Netherlands Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Dr Philip Sutorius for euthanasia in 1998, the Dutch doctors' association, the KNMG, demanded that the goalposts be shifted. Dr Sutorius had killed an 86-year-old former senator, Edward Brongersma, who had no one to care for him and was tired of living. Perhaps he had reason to be: Brongersma was an outspoken advocate of paedophilia and author of a two-volume study called Loving Boys. After spending time in jail for child sex, he became chairman of the Judiciary Committee of the Dutch Senate from 1969 to 1977 and helped to push through repeal of the laws under which he had been convicted.
The KNMG has now released a lengthy report (in Dutch) in support of voluntary euthanasia for existential rather than for medical reasons.(2) The chairman of the committee, Dr Jos Dijkhuis, argues that "suffering is too often linked to illness" and that a person who simply cannot bear to live any longer and whose outlook on the future is hopeless is "suffering from life".
None of this comes as a surprise. Dutch doctors have been killing their patients upon request for years with the connivance of the government, even before the practice was legalised in 2002. Immediately thereafter came reports that many doctors were killing patients outside of the agreed guidelines because there was too much red tape. Broadening the ambit of euthanasia to include children under 12 who cannot give informed consent and people whom no medicine can cure because they are not sick is a natural development. Dementia is already deemed a valid reason for euthanasia.(3) As well, it is already an option for 12-year-olds who have their parents' consent.
These Christmas goodies confirm that the Dutch medical profession -- with many honourable exceptions -- is suffering from terminal case of navel-gazing.
Join Mercator today for free and get our latest news and analysis
Buck internet censorship and get the news you may not get anywhere else, delivered right to your inbox. It's free and your info is safe with us, we will never share or sell your personal data.
Doesn't it ask how other countries view Holland's accelerating ride down the slippery slope?
Consider, for instance, what the United States will think. Effectively the Dutch have legalised the death penalty for people whose crime is simply to be young and sick or old and depressed. And this comes from a country which has been wagging its finger at the United States about the immorality of enforcing the death penalty for the mentally ill!
Under the presidency of the Netherlands, the European Commission chided the US for refusing to sign an international agreement banning the execution of people with mental disorders. "The EU restates its firm conviction," it said, "that the execution of persons suffering from mental disorder is contrary to widely accepted human rights norms and standard... In cases where the death penalty is carried out, any miscarriage of justice, which is occasionally inevitable in any legal system, would be irreversible."(4) Euthanasia is also irreversible, but it happens every day in Dutch nursing homes. In 2003 there were 1,815 reported cases of euthanasia, a figure which everyone agrees is greatly understated. In the United States, for all its faults, at least we know how many people are executed every year. In the Netherlands, reliable statistics are unavailable for matters as basic as numbers those killed and their ages.
Consider, too, what Dutch Muslims will think -- especially after the brutal murder of a Dutch film-maker for insulting Islam. "Euthanasia violates the purpose of preserving religion, hifdh ad-din, because it involves a human attempt to violate the divine prerogative of giving and taking away life," according to the "fatwa bank" of IslamOnline.(5) If many Christians are incensed by the legalisation of euthanasia, what will unbalanced Muslim extremists think? Will it increase their esteem for Dutch culture to know that the test case for the introduction of euthanasia without illness centred on a world-renowned paedophile? Will they admire a relaxed, tolerant, freedom-loving culture which allows involuntary euthanasia of children under 12?
Why the Netherlands has become the epicentre of world euthanasia baffles scholars. But surely one reason is the arrogant assumption that, unless proven otherwise, doctors are rational, well-balanced and compassionate -- ideally suited to decide whether their patients should live or die.
However, doctors may actually be less healthy psychologically than the rest of the population, not more. An Australian review of doctors' emotional health based on international research found that depression, burn-out and psychiatric illness are very common amongst doctors, but few seek professional assistance.(6) They are twice as likely to commit suicide. Female doctors are six times more likely. One study has suggested that doctors were more afraid of death than seriously ill patients. Psychiatrists have the highest suicide rate of all specialties. Giving stressed, depressed and burnt-out doctors the authority to kill their patients, turning a blind eye as they kill without permission, and changing the law when they flout it will eventually lead to abuses on a colossal scale.
It has become clear that the Dutch government and medical profession have no intention of stopping their country's slide into abuses of the most fundamental of all human rights. It is hypocritical for the Netherlands to demand that countries like Turkey scrub up their record on human rights before applying for membership in the European Union. What the international community must do is apply pressure on the Netherlands to halt its slide down the slippery slope.
Michael Cook is editor of MercatorNet.
Image: pixlr AI generator
Notes
(1) "Paediatricians call for nationwide protocol for the ending of life of unbearably and incureably suffering newborns", Groningen University Hospital press release, Dec 10, 2004
(2) "Lijden aan het leven" ("Suffering from life"). Dec 2004
(3)"Euthanasia allowed in some dementia cases". Expatica. Jun 3, 2004.
(4)"EU Statement on Death Penalty in the US". July 29, 2005.
(5) "Islam's Stance on Euthanasia". IslamOnline.com. Nov 29, 2004.
(6) "The Conspiracy of Silence". Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. July 2004
Have your say!
Join Mercator and post your comments.
-
Sheila Liaugminas published this page in The Latest 2023-12-28 16:41:37 +1100
