- Free newsletter
- The Latest
- Topics
-
About
What would really happen if the US Department of Education went away?
After the presidential election victory by Donald Trump, perennial calls to end the US Department of Education grew louder. With Republicans gaining control of the US Senate, and possibly retaining control of the US House of Representatives as well, the prospect of eliminating the department became more plausible.
But don’t hold your breath.
When Trump won the presidency in 2016, Republicans also controlled both chambers of Congress and the Department of Education remained solidly intact, despite legislative proposals to abolish it.
Decentralisation
That is not to say that lawmakers shouldn’t try. There is no constitutional role for the federal government in education, and all policies related to education should be made at the state and local levels.
If voters here in Massachusetts (including me) want to eliminate high-stakes standardised testing in public schools, we should be able to do so without a peep from Washington, DC. Similarly, if the citizens of Oklahoma support Bible study in public schools, they should be able to grapple with that policy amongst themselves, without the federal government chiming in.
A decentralised education system is much better able to reflect and respond to the diverse needs and preferences of a pluralistic society than one controlled from the top.
Join Mercator today for free and get our latest news and analysis
Buck internet censorship and get the news you may not get anywhere else, delivered right to your inbox. It's free and your info is safe with us, we will never share or sell your personal data.
While unlikely, shuttering the US Department of Education would not be the end of the world. Abolishing the department may sound extreme, but it’s important to remember that the federal Department of Education is a relatively new installation, created as a cabinet-level position by President Jimmy Carter in 1979 and opening its doors a year later. Prior to that, there was a federal Office of Education in place since 1867 that was relatively small and inconsequential. Education was largely managed by states and local school districts, as it should be.
Freedom from bureaucracy
Almost as soon as the department was created, there were calls to eliminate it. In 1980, Ronald Reagan campaigned on the idea; but when he won the presidency, he was unable to follow through on the promise and, in fact, asked Congress to increase the department’s budget. Even so, only about 11 percent of the nearly one trillion dollars that today’s US taxpayers spend each year on public schooling comes from the federal government — although that percentage has ticked up in recent years.
Trump has called for wide-ranging changes in American education, from promoting prayer in school to enacting mandatory patriotic education. Anyone worried about how the Trump administration could affect education policy should wholeheartedly support the elimination of the US Department of Education.
Similarly, anyone worried about the education policies that the Biden administration touted, from college debt relief to DEI, should also support the elimination of this department.
A weak federal role in education policy is not only what the Constitutional framers envisioned; it is also what will ensure that each state and school district can enact the policies that their people want — without DC bureaucrats getting in the way.
What do you think of this proposal? Let us know your thoughts below.
This article was originally published on FEE.org. Read the original article.
Image credit: Pexels
Have your say!
Join Mercator and post your comments.
-
David Page commented 2024-12-02 06:37:54 +1100“Infested with lefties”. I guess that doesn’t rise to the level if insult around here.
-
Malcolm McLean commented 2024-12-02 01:12:07 +1100The department is obviously infested with lefties. So eliminate it, regardless of any other considerations.
-
David Page commented 2024-12-01 12:40:52 +1100Mrs Cracker, whatever happens under a Trump administration, Massachusetts school will always be far better than yours.
-
mrscracker commented 2024-12-01 02:25:30 +1100Good morning Mr. Mouse. I hope you had a very blessed Thanksgiving. 🦃
In reading about history and looking at my family’s history I’ve been able to see how very complicated it can be. But patriotism is more than history. In a Christian sense it’s a virtue of filial piety.
In Mexico children dress up in Revolutionary era costumes to celebrate their history even though revolution in Mexico had some very bloody consequences. One village in Sonora was left without a single man or boy over 15 years old thanks to Pancho Villa’s forces.
Patriotism is more about love of a people, place, and culture than about love of government. -
mrscracker commented 2024-12-01 02:10:51 +1100I admire President Jimmy Carter for his decency. God bless him for that. But seriously, he was one of our least able presidents and divesting ourselves of a layer of bureaucracy from his administration seems reasonable.
-
Anon Emouse commented 2024-11-30 03:41:18 +1100“Mandatory patriotic education” isn’t dystopian in the slightest.
-
Michael Cook followed this page 2024-11-29 16:12:29 +1100
-