- Free newsletter
- The Latest
- Topics
-
About
Does the West still have a culture?
The Crisis of Culture: Identity Politics and the Empire of Norms
by Olivier Roy | Hurst Publishers, 2024, 217 pages
Olivier Roy’s new book, The Crisis of Culture: Identity Politics and the Empire of Norms, was published in March.
In it, the French political scientist continues to examine cultural changes in Europe and beyond, just as he did in his provocative and profound 2020 book, Is Europe Christian?
Here, the question is not whether Europe’s culture is Christian, but whether or not the West has a culture at all in a world where social norms have been rapidly cast aside, and a world where identity politics centred around issues like race and gender have risen to the fore.
With so much of modern politics relating to questions of value and identity, this is a timely and engaging book addressing often overlooked questions.
Laying out his case, Roy describes the distinct aspects of culture as a concept: what it is and how it functions.
In an anthropological sense, Roy writes, culture “creates habitus, implicit rules of the games, a sort of self-evidence, a ‘normal’ state.”
When understood in terms of a canon, culture “is a set of products and practices (oral narratives, writings, works — which are then described as artistic — music, even certain forms of ritualised practices) that are selected and taught, in other words, handed down according to rules and procedures, with axiological intent, providing a moral ideal for all…”
The existence of a shared culture is important for creating a sense of stability and normality within any society, yet Roy suggests that a process of deculturation is underway across the world, and he believes that this is impacting dominant cultures as well as more derivative ones.
Pointing to his previous work, Roy emphasises the significance of the “radical departure from Christian culture” which has occurred, most obviously in the hedonistic 1960s when “desire replaced reason as the basis of autonomy and freedom.”
Atomisation
Today’s morally and socially individualistic environment is “narcissistic”, and technological changes have enabled an acceleration of this process.
“Social life is no longer tied to the place where one lives or even the physical reality surrounding the user; the internet knows nothing of strong social bonds, for it offers a disembodied bond that never approaches individuals holistically but considers only that part of them that they choose to engage… People choose only what they want to be, with no social determinism,” he writes.
He goes on to add that the crisis of culture is linked closely to the crisis of ‘desocialisation’, in which social bonds within societies have been weakening, as “individuals are no longer involved in a web of real social relations that structure their various activities: work, leisure, sexuality, meals and so on.”
The rise of what the author (rather lazily) labels as ‘neoliberalism’ has also had an impact in this respect. Roy makes the astute observation that economic changes, such as the decline in industrial employment, have had a particularly significant impact on lower-income segments of society by depriving them of a “social and territorial base” in which working-class cultures could flourish.
Aside from secularisation, mass immigration and the obvious shift in moral values that has occurred, the individualistic focus on identity politics is playing a massive role in this overarching crisis.
Instead of seeking to build a shared community, much of today’s discourse relates to very niche interests where many are “engaged in a race to find small differences”, and where the loudest practitioners of identitarian politics are increasingly championing “censorship and limits on the freedom of expression to better guarantee one’s own freedom to be.”
Join Mercator today for free and get our latest news and analysis
Buck internet censorship and get the news you may not get anywhere else, delivered right to your inbox. It's free and your info is safe with us, we will never share or sell your personal data.
Roy is not the first author to highlight the importance of culture in allowing a society to function. In 1988, E.D. Hirsch’s Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know set out a convincing argument that it was essential for people to have a basic body of knowledge in order to fully participate in any society.
Roy’s argument is broader though and the basic problem he is addressing is more serious; this is no longer an issue of insufficient education, but a question of what, if any, substantive ideas, traditions and behaviours should be exalted.
Religious factor
Religion pervades this short book, unsurprisingly, given the author’s background and expertise.
Also unsurprising is the number of references to Catholicism, including Roy’s assessment of the Church’s response to the sexual revolution and its ongoing challenge to the West’s ‘culture of death’, which even the populist politicians who claim to defend Christian heritage have no intent of challenging.
The Crisis of Culture is short and to some extent insufficient. In assessing the current situation in France and elsewhere for example, Roy is critical of populists for their othering of Islam, without ever addressing the scale of the unease among native populations or the specific reasons behind it.
Too often, he is theoretical rather than practical. Roy sometimes falls into a philosopher’s trap: asking too many questions, making abstract arguments while trying to answer them, and then failing to develop them properly before quickly venturing onto fresh ground.
Despite this, The Crisis of Culture raises pressing questions, including the question of what can serve as a binding force in an environment where liberal universalists tend to be ardently opposed to culture linked to religion and unenthusiastic about promoting a national culture more broadly.
No political faction is absolved of blame for what has occurred. Roy argues that “[c]onservatives are nostalgic for a fake harmony of culture and identity” and that advocates of multiculturalism “have reduced the very idea of culture to a set of markers with no real content.”
While Olivier Roy ultimately has no answer about how to resolve this dilemma in an increasingly diverse and divided West, he offers sage advice in urging readers to avoid the temptation of the bunker, calling for a shared effort to “leave our protected spaces behind and rediscover heterogeneity, difference and debate.”
What do you think of this analysis? Leave your comments below.
James Bradshaw writes from Ireland on topics including politics, history, culture, film and literature.
Image credit: Pexels
Have your say!
Join Mercator and post your comments.
-
Rob McKilliam commented 2024-07-23 11:31:23 +1000Mr Siemer: I’m sorry. I did not understand your point.
-
Rob McKilliam commented 2024-07-23 11:30:44 +1000Mrs Cracker: Yes, I think you are quite right. My thinking is that ‘religion’ is (or should be) simply the formal study of the spiritual side of existence, in the same way that ‘science’ is the formal study of the material side of existence. Just as there are different specialities in science, perhaps there are different specialities in religion.
Religion only becomes divisive when someone (usually a church leader) does not accept God as their authority but decides that they are the authority – and many people blindly follow them. -
Rob McKilliam commented 2024-07-23 08:15:13 +1000David: That is an excellent question. One I keep thinking about.
On the surface the answer is simple: – just ask God. It is called ‘prayer’. God will usually answer in some way.
The difficult bit is knowing if you have received and understood the answer correctly,
Understanding that you might have interpreted God’s answer incorrectly highlights the importance of an open mind, critical thinking skills, humility and respectful debate.
Note that it is often impossible to have a respectful debate with someone who does not accept God as their authority. You are wrong because they are always right. -
Jürgen Siemer commented 2024-07-23 05:29:37 +1000Rob, everybody can understand or, I would rather say, knows, that there is a creator, an omnipotent super-natural being, a personal god who decided to create the universe, including time, ourselves and our souls.
But what else can he know?
For that we need revelation. If do not examine the revelation you will end up building yourself a God that you like. -
mrscracker commented 2024-07-23 02:09:00 +1000No matter what the article or subject matter ,comments always turn to religion. Which I suppose is a good thing. It’s just a shame when it becomes so divisive.
Just FYI: the Catholic Church has over 20 rites & those rites have differing languages & liturgies. Inclusivity shouldn’t be applied selectively. It’s all good. -
David Page commented 2024-07-22 17:33:36 +1000Rob, how do you know what god wants?
-
Rob McKilliam commented 2024-07-22 12:34:10 +1000Mr Page, Mr Siemer and Peter: No, I don’t believe culture and religion are the same thing. Religion is a sub-set of a culture.
I believe religion’s job is ONLY to try and help us, as individuals, understand our spiritual nature and learn how to listen to and get closer to God. Most real religions try to do the same thing, but in different ways.
Church leaders are not my authority. God is my authority.
The problem comes when we, as individuals, do not accept God as our authority. Unfortunately that is now the case for many/most (?) people in the West. -
David Page commented 2024-07-20 08:32:50 +1000You are equating “culture” with “religion”. Are they really the same thing?
-
Michael Cook followed this page 2024-07-19 14:59:26 +1000
-
Peter Murphy commented 2024-07-17 10:14:48 +1000You are a bit over-sensitive there, Mr Siemer. And, as often is the case, you quote me out of context. There is no ‘arrogance’ in my questioning; simply an attempt to seek the underlying basis of your comment.
As for my understanding of the “canonical status of the Latin Mass”, I accept the Holy Father’s July 2021 motu proprio, Traditionis Custodes, that placed restrictions on Latin Masses. I dare not ask, do you? -
Jürgen Siemer commented 2024-07-17 02:29:46 +1000Peter, I respectfully disagree: the context that you created, was your distinction between the “Latin Mass lovers” and the Catholic church, implying that one would automatically become a non-catholic because of love for or visiting the Latin Mass.
Here is the quote from your comment below: “The Catholic Church, not the traditionalists, nor the Latin Mass lovers, not the extremist lefties, but the Catholic Church under the guidance of the Holy Father …”.
And then you have the arrogance of asking me if I was accepting the teaching, the magisterium of the Catholic church.
You are not the policemen and therefore you do not have a right to my answer.
But to calm your almost zelotic temper: I do accept the teaching completely.
You do not know me and obviously you did not know the canonical status of the Latin mass. If you want to accuse me of anything, you are free to do it.
However: please substantiate your accusations with good reasoning next time.
And of course, I am willing to accept your apology. -
Peter Murphy commented 2024-07-16 22:14:47 +1000Here we go. Everything out of context. Where did I say that the ‘traditional rite latin mass’ had been forbidden? There is no point is attempting to ‘discuss’ this topic with you, Mr Siemer.
No one is ‘judging’ you, just observing, and it seems obvious that you want a different Church to today’s Catholic Church.
There are options. I choose to accept the magisterium of the Catholic Church and of Pope Francis. Do you, Mr Siemer?. -
Jürgen Siemer commented 2024-07-16 21:40:57 +1000Peter, the lack of knowledge is your problem. The traditional rite latin mass has never been forbidden. Pope Benedict confirmed that. I believe that something so fundamental as a rite that simply was common practice for so long and therefore right, cannot be declared wrong. And if you had studied the documents of the council, you would know that the council has not forbidden the traditional rite.
The traditional rite is used, with permission of the Vatican and the Pope e.g. by the fraternity St.Peter, the Institute Christ the King and other places.
While Pope Francis has done many things that make our lives difficult and while he clearly does not treat us as we would like to be treated, we do accept the authority of the Pope and we pray for him in every mass.
We are Catholics and we are proud members of the holy Roman Catholic church, in spite of the fact that it is not always funny.
And who are you to judge that we do not accept the authority of the Pope? -
Peter Murphy commented 2024-07-16 20:59:13 +1000Your knowledge of Church History is rather lacking, Mr Siemer. It’s not your use of Latin that is the problem. It is your non-acceptance of the Church’s Ecumnenical Council and your refusal to accept the authority of the Holy Father, Pope Francis.
No one is booting you out of the Church, Mr Siemer. You have booted yourself out of the Church! -
Jürgen Siemer commented 2024-07-16 20:12:56 +1000Peter, then explain to me how your “positive” Western culture makes you try to boot me out of the Catholic Church?
And how can I be an extremist, simply because I love the rite, that has been the standard rite in most Catholic masses for at least 1500 years and that had grown organically out of the temple rite and out of what Jesus had teached our forfathers? -
Peter Murphy commented 2024-07-16 19:13:40 +1000And, what do you think of the East, James?
Russia, China, Korea. Do the culture in these countries something that we should be aspiring to?
What’s wrong with Mercator?
Try publishing positive articles regarding western culture. It’s there for the taking.
Furthermore,
The Catholic Church, not the traditionalists, nor the Latin Mass lovers, nor the extremist lefties, but the Catholic Church under the guidance of the Holy Father, Pope Francis, is where I “fill my tank”! -
Jürgen Siemer commented 2024-07-16 04:17:50 +1000The word culture has a latin origin, meaning to take care of something. For instance, you cultivate land, you cultivate a garden by planting, fertilizing, and by uprooting weeds and protecting the garden against pests or unwanted guests.
If you do it right, then the garden brings fruit, becomes more productive land that can feed a family much better than by not cultivating it.
Hence, there are two characteristics one can use to assess a culture 1/ that one becomes active and does not stay lazy. 2/ that your activities producer good fruit of the activity.
So what are the fruit of our western current activities: honestly I do not recognize many positive things, but I see so many rotten fruits: where there should be wisdom, growth and beauty there is instead so much idiocy, death, debt and ugliness. Where there should be Caritas and love, there is so much envy and egoism.
We, the western world, need a fundamental renewal.
Where do I, personally, get it? Every Sunday morning in our traditional Latin mass, where my tank gets filled with truth, beauty, Caritas and love.
And where I, without having earned it, benefit from the sacrifice of him, who claimed and is the way, the truth and the love.
Having filled my “tank” I am trying to take care of my family and my daily work.
As of today, I am extremely grateful that my family still looks like a beautiful garden to me. -