Why aren’t kids reading anymore? Maybe because teachers treat them like children

Mercator recently ran a piece, “101 Books Millennials Must Read Before They Die”. No chance of that happening according to a new report from the UK’s National Literacy Trust showing that, of 76,000 British schoolchildren surveyed, only a third said they enjoyed reading for pleasure, the lowest figure since such polls began in 2005.

Maybe this site should be more realistic and issue a follow-up article, “101 Long Words Millennials Must Read Before They Die” instead?

Earlier this year, I was disturbed to see my old university lecturer in English Literature Sir Jonathan Bate complaining the students who come to him no longer enjoy the discipline to read long books any more. I used to enjoy Bate’s old lectures on Renaissance Literature, in which he would causally recommend we went away and read Montaigne’s Essays – all 1,269 pages of them. Personally, I’m glad I took his advice. Nowadays, he might be advising undergraduates to go away and read the Collected Works of Topsy & Tim instead.

Speaking to the BBC, Bate complained that “I’ve been teaching in British and American universities for 40 years, and when I began in Cambridge, you could say to students ‘this week, it’s Dickens, so please read Great Expectations, David Copperfield and Bleak House’. Now, instead of three novels in a week, many students will struggle to get through one novel in three weeks.”

Bate blamed schools for this, and “the tendency to prescribe works because they’re shorter”, but also noted that “the very desirable idea of getting more students from disadvantaged backgrounds” into universities, rather than simply those with the best prior exam results, as in the past, played its role too. "Because those students come from disadvantaged schools where the teacher’s main task is crowd control, the demands in terms of reading long books are just not there.” That’s equity for you: lowering the standards of all to pander to those of the least able. Maybe this goal isn’t quite so “very desirable” after all, then, but deeply self-defeating?

Losing the plot

Bate was partly responding to an essay which had just appeared in The Atlantic, “The Elite College Students Who Can’t Read Books”, which, at just over 2,000 words, was probably labelled TLDR (Too Long, Didn’t Read) by the kids it was describing.

Here, US college professors were interviewed, bemoaning how, thanks to a new focus upon reading purely for information in schools over recent years, many schoolchildren had never actually been required to read a full adult novel in the classroom, instead focusing upon analysing key extracts alongside brief plot summaries.

I am reminded of an old saying, to the effect that “Rates of literacy vs illiteracy have always been the same right throughout history, even in the age of universal education. It’s just that, these days, the illiterate people can read.” So The Atlantic said it was with 2020s American college students. Whereas in years gone by they turned up saying their favourite books were Wuthering Heights and Jane Eyre, now they reported, with no apparent shame, their preferred texts were Young Adult novels like the Harry Potter and Percy Jackson series.

According to one professor, “It’s not that they don’t want to do the reading” assigned. “It’s that they don’t know how.” Is this really true? I was once an English teacher myself and would deliberately give my students texts of a far higher level than national recommendations said I should. They did indeed find Thomas Hardy, W.B. Yeats, William Blake and Evelyn Waugh hard going at first, but after a few weeks, they soon got used to it, at least the ones in the higher-ability classes – i.e., the only ones who should actually be going to university to study Literature in the first place, rather than opening up the doors to those who are clearly unsuited to it in the false gods of “inclusivity” and “equity”.

Striving to make university courses “accessible” to all, no matter their actual innate levels of ability, just leads to scenarios like the girl I met on my own undergraduate English course two decades ago, who was genuinely puzzled by the fact she had to read the books for herself, on her own, rather than having her teacher read every last word out loud to the whole group, as had been her sole prior experience at school. “He used to put on funny voices,” she lamented, and left the course before she was pushed. I doubt she took Professor Bate up on his invitation to read Montaigne, unless he was prepared to put on his best Inspector Clouseau voice and do it all for her.

How was this particular student “empowered” by the principle of open access? All she was really given the opportunity to do was to waste a year of her life (and several thousand pounds) studying a subject she neither understood nor enjoyed. When elitism is a synonym simply for “snobbery” it might be a bad thing, as with Hardy’s Jude the Obscure being barred from entrance to Christminster University due to his low-born origins. But when elitism relates to course entry requirements being based upon an applicant’s actual skill and ability, not social class, then elitism is better thought of simply as a synonym for “realism”. If Hardy’s final novel had been about a low-born retard being justly denied access to higher learning, as opposed to a low-born savant, then Jude the Obscure would have been a comedy, not a tragedy – and Hardy tended not to write many of those.

 

 

 

 

 

 

icon

Join Mercator today for free and get our latest news and analysis

Buck internet censorship and get the news you may not get anywhere else, delivered right to your inbox. It's free and your info is safe with us, we will never share or sell your personal data.

Judge a book by nothing but its cover

Another culprit fingered by Bate for the more recent decline in his students’ reading skills was the “currently fashionable” idea that it was all due to “the attrition of [teens’] attention span due to smartphones, six-minute YouTube videos and instant TikTok dopamine hits.”

Inspired by Bate’s words, British tabloid the Daily Mail went on the hunt for the most comically moronic examples of so-called “Book-Tokkers”, a tribe of generally female millennial social media influencers whose brand centres upon making short, ultra-enthusiastic and chatty videos for the clip-sharing app in question, proclaiming their enthusiasm for works which disproportionately seem to be from the genre of Young Adult fantasy romance – think gay elves, lesbian mermaids, and other such fairies, both literal and figurative.

These seem little more than teenage Mills & Boon, but even their limited requirements appear too high for some. The Daily Mail highlighted the sad case of Miranda from the US, known online as @probablyoffreading, who held out her hands in measurement and said “If there’s a paragraph this big, I’m skipping it, I’m skipping it,” which would be a bit unfortunate if said long paragraph happened to be the one in which Sherlock Holmes finally revealed who the killer was or something. 

 

Other BookTokkers cited by the Mail admitted that they “only read the dialogue” in books, not any of the actual descriptions. Why not stick to reading play-scripts, then? Better not skip the stage-directions if you do, though, otherwise you might miss that King Duncan gets stabbed.

The most notorious example was that of another US BookTokker called @yannareads, who apparently can’t. This highly blonde individual went viral back in August after asking this of the Young Adult fantasy novel Six of Crows: “Why are the pages filled with so many words?” Because it’s a book. This classic idiocy promptly produced mocking tweets like the following: 

 This sounds true. A rival group to the BookTokkers are the “Bookstagrammers”, who post boastful photos of themselves enjoying books on the online photo-sharing app Instagram. But by “enjoying” here, they don’t necessarily mean “reading” – some simply purchase books to match them to their outfits, like so:   

As a sale is a sale, publishers are now designing book covers with social media specifically in mind; some Bookstagrammers buy multiple copies of the same title with different coloured covers so as to co-ordinate them with their chosen daily outfits. Books have become fashion accessories, things to be seen reading (or pretending to read), rather than to actually read per se – a bit like when everyone bought Stephen Hawking’s A Brief History of Time back in the 1980s, placed it prominently on their bookshelves, but never actually got beyond page ten, as it was incomprehensible.

So, this phenomenon is not entirely new – but what is perhaps new is that, today, decisions about what actual books to publish in the first place are beginning to be made based purely on how they will look on social media, it is not simply the surface superficiality of their covers as such that are being designed to play well online.

If influencers wanted to be truly adventurous in their humour, though, they’d pose for selfies holding the original-name first edition of The  N***** of the Narcissus by Joseph Conrad. Or maybe even just a copy of Mein Kampf?  

Sending text messages

Bookshops too are being remodelled to cater for such highly online persons. A few years back, I remember being initially puzzled by seeing a teenage girl in my local branch of Waterstones (Britain’s biggest book retailer), wandering around the place holding up book after book whilst smiling inanely into a cameraphone being compliantly wielded by her mother, and making “peace” signs, etc. After 20 minutes, the pair left the shop without making a single purchase. “We get this a lot …” an assistant wearily explained – and that is how I first learned what BookTokking and Bookstagramming were: i.e., the pure work of Satan.

Today, branches of Waterstones nationwide now have special “BookTok Recommended” tables, explicitly designed for tweenage girls to gather around giggling and taking selfies, hopefully before actually buying something this time. And, if not, maybe stores could just employ Humbert Humbert as a highly creepy assistant to keep such underage timewasters away – they certainly won’t be well-read enough to know who he actually is.

A poll of 2,000 16-25-year-old bookworms found around 59 percent credited BookTok with sparking their love of reading in the first place – but what does the phrase “reading a book” even now truly mean here? Going online and bragging about having done so; on BookTok and Bookstagram, you merely perform being a reader more than actually being one. You could even just be lying, bluffing your way through your enthusiasms, based on skim-reading summaries of the books elsewhere.

Being well-read still carries some kind of cultural cachet, in spite of everything, being popularly viewed as some kind of vestigial proxy for traditional ideas of intelligence, culture, or whatever. Seen in this light, BookTokking is pure vanity more than anything. Why, acting like this would be as utterly show-offy and self-conceited as writing an article on a public news and commentary website boasting about having read an entire 1,269-page edition of Michel de Montaigne, or something …

As for myself, I’m afraid I’ve only read about 20 of Mercator’s “101 Books Millennials Must Read Before They Die” – but I can assure you, they’re all the longest and most complex ones with by far the greatest literary worth. They’re all lined up coded neatly by colour and size on my bedroom bookshelf, and I can provide you with the highly reshareable photos to prove it if you want.  


Have you ever read a book more than 250 pages long (not including the Harry Potter novels)? Would you repeat the experience?   


Steven Tucker is a UK-based writer with over ten books to his name. His latest, “Hitler’s and Stalin’s Misuse of Science”, comparing the woke pseudoscience of today to the totalitarian pseudoscience of the past, was released in 2023.

Image credit: Bigstock 


 

Showing 11 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Malcolm McLean
    commented 2024-12-18 18:57:33 +1100
    Paul Bunyan. Yes they are reading. Which is a good thing. But short social media news feeds are not literature. When we were young, we read books, immersively. And we acquired a certain familiarity with the author. CS Lewis created Narnia. He told us how to behave if we were to lead dignified lives. And he couldn’t have done with short opinion pieces on social media.
  • Paul Bunyan
    commented 2024-12-18 09:12:19 +1100
    Ms Grevillea, children who spend time on their phones are most likely reading a large number of news articles. That should be encouraged.
  • Janet Grevillea
    commented 2024-12-18 08:39:54 +1100
    Paul Bunyon, I have never enjoyed playing sport, nor watching it. However, when I hear that related children/adolescents are playing sport I rejoice that for at least one half day a week they are not thumbing away at their mobile phones!
  • Malcolm McLean
    commented 2024-12-18 04:47:37 +1100
    For years I’ve wanted to write a story. And finally I succeeded. But will anyone read it?
    http://malcolmmclean.github.io/babyxrc/StToms/index.htm
    We need a literate culture.
  • mrscracker
    Bate complained that “I’ve been teaching in British and American universities for 40 years, and when I began in Cambridge, you could say to students ‘this week, it’s Dickens, so please read Great Expectations, David Copperfield and Bleak House’. Now, instead of three novels in a week, many students will struggle to get through one novel in three weeks.”


    A community up the road from us has an adult illiteracy rate of 30%. Things have improved greatly here since the early 1900’s when we had the highest rates of illiteracy in the nation but it’s still a thing today.
    I have at least 3 great grandparents who I know were unable to read or write. I’ve heard that back in Charles Dickens’ day this was the case for many people & his books serialized in newspapers were thought to have been written with that in mind. People who were literate would read each installment out loud to those who were unable to read on their own. And before the compulsory education law in 1870 that was quite a few.
  • mrscracker
    I don’t know what this says about me, Mr. O’Brien but I love picture books. A picture’s worth a thousand words so they say.
    :)
    I enjoy reading too. These days we’re blessed to have audiobooks on YouTube that we can listen to while driving or doing chores. I picked a couple 5 gallon buckets of pecans listening to Willa Cather’s “My Antonia” being read.
  • Patrick Obrien
    commented 2024-12-18 02:31:24 +1100
    “One of the great things about books is sometimes there are some fantastic pictures.” George W. Bush
  • Anon Emouse
    commented 2024-12-18 01:51:26 +1100
    Also, steven – again, your byline in the “about the author” section – you realize that the nazis burned any research about trans individuals, right? As in – the opposite of woke?
    But don’t let facts get in the way of trying to make a buck I guess
  • Anon Emouse
    commented 2024-12-18 01:50:15 +1100
    Maybe they’re not reading because conservative parents are banning books from schools.
  • Paul Bunyan
    commented 2024-12-17 15:03:50 +1100
    I blame sport. Every hour spent (ie wasted) on sport is one hour that can’t be spent on more useful academic activities.
  • Steven Tucker
    published this page in The Latest 2024-12-17 14:57:48 +1100