A library without books is like a book without pages

Just before Christmas here on Mercator, I bemoaned a new report from the UK’s National Literacy Trust, demonstrating that fewer British children now enjoyed reading for pleasure than at any point since surveys had begun. In that article, I blamed dumbed-down teaching in schools, and asinine online phenomena like BookTok.

But possibly there is another culprit: libraries. Libraries are meant to make children like books, not hate them. But, in seeking to fulfil this first laudable remit in a rather wrong-headed way, are librarians today all too often doing the precise reverse?  

Taking a swipe at the wrong problem

There is a disturbing new phenomenon afoot – babies and toddlers are turning up at nurseries and schools not knowing what books are, or how to use them. Used to being dumped before web-connected tablets and iPads by lazy parents, tots are attempting to turn real books’ pages simply by “swiping” them with their fingers, or holding them upside-down, thinking their pages will automatically flip the right way up, like the clever screen-displays on e-devices.

According to one 2024 report, as many as one in four children entered British education in this sad state, with only 16 percent of parents surveyed thinking it was their job to help teach their own children at least some of the basics of how to read (e.g., being able to recognise what a book is!) prior to enrolment.

Many bleeding-heart educators blame supposed “poverty” for this trend, saying things like “In a world of food banks … books are a luxury that many families just cannot afford.” Strange they can all afford iPads, then.

Some teachers have a potential solution to hand, however: “When you simply can’t afford to even heat your own home, take your child to the library. It is warm and … you might even read a book.” Yes, but only if there are still any books left there to read in the first place.

According to one profoundly depressing report, there is an increasing trend in public libraries for staff to be told by managers that they “must ‘free up’ their bookshelves from books so they aren’t cluttered and confusing to library patrons; to achieve this goal, it is proposed that those librarians who can discard the most books are given rewards … at one seminar on the theme of ‘creative libraries’, they were told that they must evolve their institution towards the day when libraries won’t have any books and ‘readers’ will visit the library for very different reasons.”

Like what? Just to use the free toilets?

 

icon

Join Mercator today for free and get our latest news and analysis

Buck internet censorship and get the news you may not get anywhere else, delivered right to your inbox. It's free and your info is safe with us, we will never share or sell your personal data.

Brave New World – same as the old one

I don’t know about you, but my hometown doesn’t have its own local library any more. It’s now called a “Learning Resource Centre”, which, translated, means a lot of the books have been burned and replaced with computers. Fair enough, to an extent. Unlike buying a handful of cheap kids’ books, computers are indeed expensive, and providing access to them for the poor is a perfectly noble aim. The trouble comes when digitalisation goes too far.

In Aldous Huxley’s great 1932 sci-fi novel Brave New World, there is a scene set in some “Neo-Pavlovian Conditioning Rooms”, in which babies are psychologically programmed to grow up hating books. Bright, appealing picture-books are laid out across the floor in front of a class of babies, who naturally crawl across to see what they are. The texts are wired up to the mains, however, and as soon as the infants touch them, they get a painful electric shock. Naturally, a life-long aversion is then formed. I feel that all responsible British parents should repeat this same procedure with copies of The Guardian.  

Contemporary Western librarians seem accidentally to have hit upon an alternative, reverse-mirror-image method of putting kids off books for life. By seeking, quite benignly, to make reading a pleasurable experience for small children by jazzing it all up endlessly with an array of interactive bells and whistles, they inadvertently only render the ordinary act of reading quietly by oneself seem incredibly boring by comparison. “Come to the library for the fun and games, stay to read the books!” is the basic idea, but instead it only ends up becoming “Come to the library for the fun and games, and then go back home to play some more!”

The concept of “gamification” is now widespread. The basic idea is to “nudge” people into doing something desirable by exploiting our innate wish to have idle fun at all times; most famously, toilet-cleaners have painted fake flies and bluebottles onto public urinals as potential “targets” for men to aim at.

For simple tasks like micturation, this theory often works admirably. But what about when it comes to more complex matters, like encouraging children to want to know how to read?  

Losing the plot

The gamification of public libraries is now big business worldwide. I found a whole 2022 academic paper, “Investigating the role of gamification in public libraries’ literacy-centred youth programming”, about the subject. Here, it is shown how, in many Western libraries, special, expensively-made kids’ sections have of late been installed, where “closed off corners in the basement that once housed the children’s stacks [of books] have been replaced with state-of-the-art, multi-level exploration zones, some complete with Willie Wonka-type installations, theatrical performances, and even [giant model] dinosaurs.”

Great! But … doesn’t that just mean you’ve replaced most of the books with miniature theme-park attractions instead?

The term “gamification” was coined in 2002 by designer Nick Pelling, to cover his then-novel idea of applying the basic mechanics of videogaming to various off-screen spheres in order to make them seem more appealing and user-friendly. For example, gamers might repeatedly attempt to beat the same difficult end-of-level boss, again and again, thereby to gain access to a new power for their character, as in Nintendo’s highly popular Metroid and Zeldagames.

Applied to reading, this might mean librarians issuing infants with stickers or badges every time they figuratively “defeat the boss” likewise by successfully managing to finish reading a series of ever-more challenging picture-books. This particular subset of gamification theory makes perfect sense, and many libraries now follow its basic model. Some even offer free books as prizes for those small visitors who successfully complete the reading-based “boss challenges” set for them.

But, as so often, an initial good idea can end up being taken too far. When the entire children’s section of your local library becomes transformed into little more than a soft-play area purely to entice the kids inside like a gingerbread house in one of those illustrated fairytale books they will soon no longer want to read, then how is it even still a library any more at all?

Here’s a photographic example of one of the many exciting attractions you can now find in a typical kid-friendly public library, according to the paper’s authors:  

I have no idea what the hell it actually is, but it certainly isn’t a bookshelf, is it? And here is a very telling illustration of what library-based adult-led group reading sessions once used to look like in the bad old days of black-and-white, and what they increasingly tend to look like now, in our laudably progressive age of glorious Technicolor:

How do the activities in that second image there even represent “reading” at all? It is blatantly just a glorified adult child-minder helping a three-year-old splash about with toy rubber dinosaurs in a paddling-pool.

But, according to the paper, this particular form of gamification via “guided movement” in programmes with names like “Storytime Yoga” and “Rock and Read” is something to be celebrated: “If there was one common thread between the storytimes offered by libraries in this survey, it’s that sitting quietly with your hands under your legs listening to someone prattle on is a thing of the past. In its place are immersive, playful, and hands-on experiences that places the learner, not the teacher, at the centre of the learning process.”

As an initial, bait-luring means to an end, fine. But when books are thrown out of libraries to make way for toy dinosaurs and paddling-pools, then this sort of thing becomes the end in itself, and we’re right back in Brave New World‘s Neo-Pavlovian Conditioning Rooms again, but back-to-front. The truly alarming thing, though, is that such literally infantile phenomena are no longer confined solely to the libraries of children – adult libraries too are now becoming gamified in their turn.

The Borrowers – but not of any books

The Los Angeles Public Library System has noticed a disturbing new phenomenon – not only fewer and fewer children, but fewer and fewer grown-ups, are coming through their doors to peruse the shelves for texts. Their solution? To get them to come in and comb the shelves looking for a race of hitherto-unknown bookspace-dwelling ultra-midgets instead, like those once depicted on the pages of classic kids’ novel The Borrowers. Here’s a glowing write-up from the Los Angeles Times:

“Imagine that your local public library is inhabited by an undiscovered race of tiny people. They’ve hidden themselves in the racks, tucked behind books and magazines, amidst history and fiction, new media and old. If you’re lucky, you might spy them — or at least their tiny homes, which are filled with minuscule beds, microscopic stools, itty-bitty flowers and furniture fashioned out of found objects such as board game pieces and one-use spice bottles. And these little folks need help. You have been cast as a ‘Teeny Tiny Beings Residential Specialist’, charged with finding the micro-humans new homes. It appears the librarians — giants, like us, at least to the microscopic persons — have been moving things around. Welcome to the Bureau of Nooks and Crannies, a new exploration-focused, play-inspired experience found inside the Lincoln Heights branch of the Los Angeles Public Library system.”

Just to repeat: this isn’t primarily aimed a children, but at adults.

It is all the work of an expert consultant named Andy Crocker, “an LA-based artist who specialises in theatrical, experience-driven entertainment, having previously collaborated with the likes of Walt Disney Imagineering and Cedar Fairs theme-parks.” In other words, Andy has literally transformed LA’s public libraries from places of learning and into actual theme-parks instead, following a supposed philosophy of “guided meditation through play”.

Each participating local library (probably all of them, I doubt they get a say) has a different novelty theme. At LA’s Atwater Village Library, the place has become akin to the haunted library in the original 1984 version of Ghostbusters, where, in the words of one participating journalist: “Guests at the library today have been instructed to fantasise that they are ghosts who treat books as entryways for thoughtful, personal reflections. We are instructed to shut our eyes and trace a finger along a shelf before opening a random book. Whatever we find on that page carries more meaning if you’re pretending to be a ghost, apparently.”

What the hell is the point of all this? In Crocker’s view, “Kids don’t need imagination assistance. Adults do.” Why don’t they just sit down and read a good book, then? That’s what they’re there for!

Time to shelve these ideas

The big question is: does any of this stuff actually work? Apparently not. As long ago as 2009, figures demonstratedthat, after UK libraries had thrown out huge amounts of their old book-stock and installed rows upon rows of computers for patrons to use instead, the number of books lent out from them had plummeted by half in under 15 years. Yet, simultaneously, the number of Internet-use sessions in libraries was up by 19 percent over the same period.

This, said the UK Government’s Museums, Libraries and Archives Council, was an excellent thing: “The library service is heeding our advice by becoming more relevant, adapting to the changing needs of its users, and meeting the challenge to supply information in the most suitable way.”

A spokesman from the Civitas think-tank was more sceptical, however, issuing a dissenting statement as follows: “Unfortunately the public library system seems to have moved from education to entertainment and as a result we are becoming increasingly illiterate as a nation.”

Libraries are progressively now being redefined as something other than libraries, merely retaining the same old name, for sake of covering the fact up. Meanwhile, if you happen to be a librarian yourself and wish to pulp all your boring old books and gamify your library instead accordingly, here’s a handy practical guide to help you do so:

Ironically, it comes in the form of a printed book.


Has your local library burned its books? 


Steven Tucker is a UK-based writer with over ten books to his name. His latest, “Hitler’s and Stalin’s Misuse of Science”, comparing the woke pseudoscience of today to the totalitarian pseudoscience of the past, was released in 2023.

Image credit: Bigstock 


 

 

 

 

Showing 5 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • mrscracker
    I think some of the extra-biblio activities are job security for librarians. When I visit our local library most patrons are using the free computers and internet.
  • Janet Grevillea
    commented 2025-01-07 08:13:19 +1100
    In our village the small one-room library has been renamed “library creative hub”.

    I used to pop into the library at least once a week, perhaps borrow a book, chat to the librarian and other residents, read the newspaper, go home feeling I had made contact with my small world.

    Then it all changed.

    It all started with a public meeting, well attended, at which a council representative outlined her vision for a library with a wet area to enable art activities to take place. The meeting overwhelmingly rejected that idea. Some of the main objectors said they themselves were artists and belonged to local art groups.

    I read a newspaper article that described similar developments in the UK. These changes were followed by the sale of some public libraries to private concerns. We wondered if that would happen here.

    Then we had several “pop up” times when the library was bedecked with posters outlining various options for the library. You could vote for the options you favoured by putting coloured stickers on posters. The most popular suggestion was for the library to include a toilet for public use.

    Then the council made all the librarians in the city redundant and replaced them with managers.

    The library closed for renovations and, when it re-opened, it had a wet area and “creative hub” added to its name. And a toilet. And a coffee bar.

    Now we have self-service. If you fill in the appropriate form and provide proof of identity you can have your library card altered to allow you to open up the library at any hour of the day between 7am and 7pm to borrow a book (or perhaps use the toilet). The manager is present for three hours a day. Eventually we will have ’self-access 24/7’.

    In the meantime street libraries have popped up outside several homes. Each is a cupboard where people can deposit books they no longer want, and take books they would like to read, all free. No librarians. No manager (apart from the owner of the house who erected the cupboard).

    The Council has issued its strategic plan for libraries. In small print it says that at some time in the future the “commercial uses” of our library will be considered. Hmmm. I must find that newspaper article about the UK.

    I no longer visit the library.
  • Anon Emouse
    commented 2025-01-07 00:32:59 +1100
    “And Tango Makes Three” a heartwarming true story about a gay penguin couple in a zoo that adopted an orphaned penguin and raised it as their own. A beloved children’s story that is one of the most frequently challenged banned books in school libraries, because people like Steven Tucker are afraid of children finding out about the existence of gay couples.

    I agree with Paul, maybe Steven should look in the mirror before bemoaning children’s lack of reading.
  • Paul Bunyan
    commented 2025-01-06 21:46:52 +1100
    Thanks to extremist right-wingers, many books can’t be read in libraries. They can only be obtained online.

    It just demonstrates that they only care about their own civil rights and their own free speech.
  • Steven Tucker
    published this page in The Latest 2025-01-06 21:36:33 +1100