- The Latest
- Topics
-
About
Never again? How the woke stole the Holocaust
January 27 was Holocaust Remembrance Day, a commemoration that political leaders are now careful to observe. Indeed, this year UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who has pledged that every child will learn about the Holocaust, even visited Auschwitz-Birkenau with his Jewish spouse.
The day was only designated as such in 2005, a late development in the recognition of that which only much later became widely known as the Holocaust or “the Shoah”, but in the decades after the War, this great crime grew in the public consciousness, coming to represent the nadir of human evil.
And yet, it seems that in January 2025 – 80 years since the liberation of Auschwitz – some politicians are emulating the Roman god Janus, who famously faced both ways.
For although it now appears to be obligatory for politicians to show their sympathy for the Jewish people by observing the Holocaust, they seem less ready to acknowledge the biggest anti-Jewish threat: Islamist terrorism. It may be fashionable to practice Holocaust observance, but it is also increasingly fashionable for politicians to show “awareness” of the Palestinian people who, their supporters allege, are suffering genocide at the hands of a vengeful Israel.
Holocaust observance can provide Janus-like politicians with the opportunity to please both parties. Starmer has faced a clash of political priorities regarding Israel – between placating the pro-Palestinian campaign while not appearing anti-Jewish –but at least he explicitly mentioned the Jewishness of Holocaust victims. In contrast, as Norman Fenton, the son of a Holocaust survivor notes, some of this year’s memorialisation did not go so far as to acknowledge this basic fact.
As Norman Fenton points out, the Holocaust Memorial Trust’s own prayer includes such lines as: “In the horrors of that history, when so many groups were targeted because of their identity, and in genocides which followed, we recognise destructive prejudices that drive people apart.”
Written under the patronage and guidance of Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis, then-Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby and Senior Imam Qari Asim, the prayer might be seen as a well-meaning attempt at making the Holocaust relevant to new generations by commemorating it alongside other, more recent crimes.
However, as Norman Fenton also notes, Karen Pollock, chief executive of the Holocaust Educational Trust, believes that HMD is being used to “erode the uniquely Jewish experience of the Holocaust and to erase antisemitism from the narrative of the day”.
Seen from this perspective, the prayer seems more about trying, on this special day, to downplay the identity of the Holocaust victims by including what has become a byword for genocidal hatred in a long list of crimes against humanity.
A kind of selective amnesia appears to have afflicted other commentators, who entirely neglected to mention Jews in their HMD memorials. Nicole Lampert says that one presenter on ITV’s Good Morning Britain “earnestly explained how the 80th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz was an opportunity to remember how ‘six million people were killed in concentration camps during the Second World War as well as millions of others, because they were Polish, disabled, gay or belonged to another ethnic group’”. She adds: “First the Nazis tried to erase us. Now those who claim to be against the Nazis are erasing us from that memory.”
Norman Fenton observes that ITV issued an apology only after complaints by Jewish organisations.
Similarly, Deputy PM Angela Rayner failed to mention Jews in her HMD statement, which read: “Tonight, I’m lighting a candle to remember all those who were murdered just for being who they were, and to stand against prejudice and hatred today. Never again.” To date, no apology has been issued.
Ms Rayner could be seen as highlighting the dilemma of the modern left-liberal progressive politician with regard to the Holocaust: how to show sympathy for the Jewish people while not looking unsympathetic to the plight of Palestinians in Gaza, whose situation has been aggressively appropriated by far-Left activists in a campaign of marches, demonstrations and even selective vandalism.
The targets of such attacks included a portrait of British politician Lord Balfour, slashed and sprayed with red paint, in protest at his historic role in the creation of the modern State of Israel.
But these are far different times, and under woke ideology, which divides humanity into oppressors and oppressed – into majorities and minorities – the State of Israel may be criticised or even attacked because it is oppressing the Palestinians, even though the latter are far more numerous, and according to the same ideology, attacking Israel means oppressing an oppressed minority.
Increasingly, however, it seems that while it is perfectly acceptable to criticise the failings and the allegedly genocidal actions of Israel, we must not acknowledge the fact that the Palestinian people are represented by a terror group with genocidal intentions against Israel – that the “poor victims” of the Israeli defence forces are actually hostages of Hamas.
It might be thought that if Western politicians were threatened by the same malign forces, they would be less inclined to lecture Israel on the need for dialogue with those intent only on kidnapping and murdering them.
But Western nations have been threatened by terror and still live under that threat, although perhaps this explains politicians’ reluctance to call out the threat: perhaps they hope that by not being too vocal about Islamist terrorism, their nations may be spared even worse outrages. Whatever the reason for their selective timidity, it does seem as if the Jewish state, far from being seen as a positive response to the Holocaust, is fast becoming the scapegoat of the nations, as the Jewish people were once the scapegoat of the Nazis. However, to the far-Left mindset, “the Jews are the new Nazis”, so attacking them is only fair.
Holocaust memorial is now, apparently, political, and as one Jewish commentator remarks, “I’ve lost count of the times that I’ve been told Jews need to stop selfishly hogging the Holocaust”. Booker Prize winner Howard Jacobsonfamously asked “When will Jews be forgiven the Holocaust?” And his answer was: “Never”.
It is beyond ironic that the woke ideology actually “coat-tails”on the Holocaust, explaining why silencing any discussion of certain issues is now regarded as a priority: it is believed that to allow free speech on these issues is to risk another Holocaust. According to this thinking, the aggressive anti-Israel rhetoric of the far Left, which might indeed lead to violence, is perfectly acceptable, but a clumsy gesture of greeting by billionaire Elon Musk is greeted with horror as a Nazi salute. Describing Israel’s defensive actions as genocide is treated as fair comment, while expressing the scientifically-backed view that a man cannot become a woman and a woman cannot become a man justifies censorship and cancellation, even of celebrities.
Newly re-elected President Trump, who has already declared war against woke, seems to be our only hope of overthrowing this 21st century tyranny.
The Holocaust is too big to brush under the carpet, too terrible to ignore. Instead, the wokerati have resorted to something worse than Holocaust denial – “Holocaust theft”, placing it at the service of their favoured narrative. But now that they have stolen the Holocaust, will we ever hear that expression “never again” in quite the same context?
Should we memorialise the Shoah?
Ann Farmer writes from the United Kingdom. She has a Master’s degree in Jewish-Christian relations.
Image credits: Bigstock
Have your say!
Join Mercator and post your comments.
-
Emberson Fedders commented 2025-02-12 11:25:14 +1100Ha ha, yes, older people too, Mrs Cracker!
-
mrscracker commented 2025-02-11 22:51:50 +1100Yes, Mr. Fedders. Travel and interacting with other cultures is a benefit for young people. Older people, too.
🙂 -
Emberson Fedders commented 2025-02-11 11:28:48 +1100I have to agree, Mrs Cracker, travel broadens the mind! It is utterly invaluable. I’ve often thought that once a young person graduates high school they should be afforded an allowance so they can travel for a year before they start further studies, work or a trade.
-
mrscracker commented 2025-02-11 02:03:21 +1100Mr. Fedders, the casualty data comes from a Hamas controlled health ministry. And the UN has been complicit in terrorism in Gaza. I don’t trust data from either one.
I have trouble taking many political narratives seriously whether they originate on the Left or the Right. Most are deeply flawed & some completely ridiculous. As in assuming Haitians dine on dogs & cats. Mark Twain said travel broadens the mind. I agree & I believe it enables tolerance as well. -
Emberson Fedders commented 2025-02-09 13:41:47 +1100The number of murdered civilians comes from the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.
Scapegoating is THE playbook of the right. It is fundamental to their way of approaching politics to have an enemy or an ‘other’ to blame things on.
I suppose this is because for the most part, right wing policies are disagreeable to the majority of the population, and therefore they can never campaign on them. Who in their right mind would vote for tax cuts for millionaires or making prescription drugs MORE expensive?
Therefore, the right never discusses policy, they talk about the Jewish deep-state, they talk about Haitian immigrants eating pets, they rail against non-existent things like CRT in schools, they whip up moral panics about beer and movies and they constantly distract, distract, distract. -
mrscracker commented 2025-02-07 23:20:27 +1100It’s a different war and a different situation Mr. Fedders but I don’t accept data or casualty numbers from terrorists who exploit dead civilians for their gain.
.And not everyone living in Israel or benefiting from the IDF’s defense are Jews. A good percentage of Israeli residents are Arab peoples. Arab Muslims even serve in the IDF. And Israeli Bedouin Muslims have been murdered by Hamas.
George Soros is indeed Jewish through ancestry and some of his philanthropic motivations are inspired by Jewish ethos. But he’s more Jewish in name than in observance. I oppose a great many things Mr. Soros has funded but to be fair , his foundation funds other charities that I would contribute to also. Unlike some on the Right I took the time to actually look those non profits up.
🙂
Both sides in antisemitic narratives get it wrong. Each sees the flaws in the other’s prejudice and conspiracy theories and fails to see the error in their own. Which sounds a lot like human nature. We always look for a scapegoat and for several thousand years Jews have filled that role. -
Emberson Fedders commented 2025-02-07 10:23:25 +1100Antisemitism on the right is well known. From the Nazis who enacted the Holocaust to Majorie Taylor Green banging on about Jewish space lasers and many in the right-wing media ecosphere using ‘George Soros’ as a dog whistle for the Jewish deep state.
I would argue that Western Nations don’t really live under the threat of Islamic terrorism. Indeed, extremist right-wing terrorism is what worries most intelligence agencies today.
And let’s assume that most sensible people are capable of nuance. We can condemn the horrors of the Holocaust AND condemn Israel for killing approximately 50,000 people in Gaza, most who were women and children.
It’s not an either/or proposition. -
mrscracker commented 2025-02-07 03:29:52 +1100Thank you so much for this Miss Ann.
I don’t know whether focusing on antisemitism as a Left or Rightwing error is best. From my experience it’s been one of the few things the extreme Left & Right both agree on. Being of traditional leanings myself I find it more disturbing to encounter antisemitism on the Right. But yes, it’s definitely an issue on the Left as well. Some things just never go away, even after centuries. -
Anon Emouse commented 2025-02-07 02:32:24 +1100Also I’d be curious as to your thoughts, Ann, on transpeople being among the first victims of the Holocaust and the burning of Magnus Hirschfeld’s research. It is eerily similar to Trump ordering the CDC to delete research.
-
Anon Emouse commented 2025-02-06 23:17:15 +1100Bold article, given Trump’s fondness for Elon Musk who said that we need to “get over the holocaust”.
-