Why is Trump assembling a ‘nightmare team’?

Donald Trump seems eager to assemble a “nightmare team” in his appointments for key positions of his cabinet as incoming President of the United States.

Matt Gaetz has been designated as Attorney General. As the BBC reports, he is “the subject of a long-running investigation by a congressional ethics panel into a number of claims involving drugs, bribes and sex.” Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been chosen to lead the Department of Health and Human Services. While Kennedy may not be morally flawed, he does hold some unusual conspiratorial beliefs, particularly regarding health. Tulsi Gabbard's potential appointment as Director of National Intelligence raises concerns, given her tendency to show a favorable disposition toward overseas dictators.

What is Trump thinking?

I venture to say that Trump is following a script laid out by a Galilean preacher 2,000 years ago. That man shocked many people with his simple yet powerful message. He sought to bring forth what he called "the Kingdom of God"—a concept that has sparked debate for two millennia. But whatever it was, its purpose was clear: it was meant to be disruptive. The preacher soon realized he couldn’t fulfill his mission alone, so he set out to find companions. They were hardly the brightest.

Two of those companions apparently were so hot-tempered, that they were called “Sons of Thunder.” Another companion—likely the one closest to the teacher—was quite stubborn, and at one point, his master likened him to Satan. Yet another companion betrayed the preacher for 30 silver coins. The team of misfits also included sinners and prostitutes.

Now, morally speaking, Trump is no Jesus—pace some pathetic remarks by sycophants like Marjorie Taylor Greene. But they do share a contrarian aspect in their character. Jesus sought to overturn the established order of his epoch—Roman occupation, religious hypocrisy of the priestly elite, etc. Trump seems to be on a similar journey; his goal is to disrupt the comfort of the liberal affluent class, and to challenge the hypocrisy of wokeness and political correctness.

Unlike Jesus, Trump’s motives are less than noble, but that is beside the point. As perceived by his supporters, he is the real deal.

For both men, impassioned speeches have been a key element of their repertoire. But that would not suffice. They needed eccentricity. The prophets of Ancient Israel would do bizarre things to make their points. Isaiah would roam around naked; Ezekiel would cook with cow dung; Jeremiah would wear a yoke around his neck.

In the same vein, Jesus was not a drunkard and a glutton, but he was perceived as such by some. This ultimately worked to his advantage, as it reinforced the perception of him as a challenger to the established norms, which was something the people of 1st century Judea were eagerly seeking.

This is the logic that Trump cleverly uses when being photographed while eating McDonald's food with members of his inner circle: the more he is called a glutton, the better. The MAGA world is sick of holier-than-thou gluten-free snobs.

 

icon

Join Mercator today for free and get our latest news and analysis

Buck internet censorship and get the news you may not get anywhere else, delivered right to your inbox. It's free and your info is safe with us, we will never share or sell your personal data.

The story of Christianity has a hopeful ending: the misfits eventually matured and laid the foundation for a Church that remains vibrant and influential 2,000 years later. Perhaps Jesus knew all along that they were unpolished gems, and with the proper stimulus, they would turn out just fine.

One can only hope that Trump’s reasoning is similar and he has a master plan. He managed to win the election largely because of his contrarian shock value. Not for nothing did many of his followers promote the slogan, “I’m voting for the felon!” He has momentum on his side, so he needs to further enhance his countercultural persona by appointing the most outrageous candidates for key positions in his cabinet.

Once the shock value is accomplished, they can all settle down and implement reasonable policies.

Sadly, one cannot be too sure that this will happen.

The first time around, Trump didn’t become the monster many had feared, but his Administration still carried an air of chaos, which undermined the effectiveness of his policies – potentially costing him the 2020 election.

Perhaps Trump has learned his lesson, and just as Jesus ultimately succeeded in bringing out the best in the group of misfits he chose, the 47th President has similar leadership skills. As with many things related to Trump, his unpredictability makes him difficult to understand or predict. Only time will tell if, indeed, there was a master plan in assembling a “nightmare team.” 


Forward this to your friends!  


Gabriel Andrade is a university professor originally from Venezuela. He writes about politics, philosophy, history, religion, and psychology.

Image credits: Trump Sr, Trump Jr, Musk, RFK eating McDonald's / @margomartin on X  


 

Showing 35 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • David Page
    commented 2024-11-26 06:13:47 +1100
    Emberson, all the Russians have left is oil, internet scams, and a third rate military. There have been a series of bots on this site. At some point Jürgen will disappear and another will pop up.
  • Emberson Fedders
    commented 2024-11-25 11:08:37 +1100
    “Anon, I bet that, globally, your opinion is that of the minority.

    Putin can present a number of valid points substantiating his legal position.

    Full double stop."

    What is happening here? This is making me uneasy. Is the Jurgen account a bot?
  • David Page
    commented 2024-11-24 09:55:50 +1100
    I consider myself a Stoic, in the sense that it was Stoicism that informed the Enlightenment.
  • Steven Meyer
    commented 2024-11-24 07:08:48 +1100
    Y’know, Trumps latest picks look pretty middle-of-the-road status quo types.

    They’re not the “counter cultural” sorts of people who would bring about true reforms – which are much needed BTW.

    My guess – we’re going to see a Reagan rerun. Remember RIF (reductions in force)? A few well publicised sackings to satisfy the base and the BAU (business as usual) One thing that does surprise me. Apart from being an anti-vaxxer RFK Jr was a strong supporter of abortion rights. His anti-vax nutcase views aside, many of his comments on health are medical mainstream. Less ultra-processed foods. More physical activity, etc.

    Musk’s DOGE role looks to be largely an ego boost. The real payoff will come through more, and more lucrative, contracts for SpaceX. And that’s probably not a bad thing given the alternatives.
  • Steven Meyer
    commented 2024-11-23 11:54:59 +1100
    Quite right mrscracker. Every era has its bogeymen.

    You might be interested in this video. I think tt was published just before your election. so the Youtuber, who calls his channel “Daily Stoic” did not yet know the outcome.

    Why Narcissistic Leaders Always Fail (In The End)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZ4gbvjdIao

    Now I would not call myself a stoic. I mean, tell me you’re about to stick a needle in me and I start cringing in advance.

    Still, there are elements of the stoic philosophy I find attractive – more attractive than what I believe to be the false promises of religion.

    You’ve been fairly lukewarm in your defence of the cheap grifter who swindled thousands of people of their life’s savings with a fake university. I think deep down you will agree that there is a lot of truth in this guy’s assessment of the Emperor Nero and Trump.
  • mrscracker
    I’m glad you are enjoying Tom Holland’s podcast, too Mr. Steven. The most recent one I’m listening to is about Lord Nelson.
    Every era & culture has its own bogeymen. We can see through one era’s social hysteria with the advantage gained by passing time. It’s much harder to detect social delusion in a present culture we’re surrounded by..
  • Jürgen Siemer
    commented 2024-11-23 01:01:13 +1100
    Anon, I bet that, globally, your opinion is that of the minority.

    Putin can present a number of valid points substantiating his legal position.

    Full double stop.
  • Anon Emouse
    commented 2024-11-22 23:42:35 +1100
    Jurgen,

    Putin is on the wrong side of international law. Full stop.
  • Jürgen Siemer
    commented 2024-11-22 20:28:03 +1100
    Emberson, my original point was that, through their actions, the US, from the reasonable point of view of the Russians, have become a party in the war in Ukraine.

    That creates the risks of further escalation, in a worst case scenario turning Europe into a nuclear battlefield.

    Yes, here the US government is on the wrong side of international law, it is not indeed on the side of truth and honesty.

    I am writing this with a lot of pain in my heart, with relatives in the US and truly an admiration how the pilgrims and settlers had built a state, that looked almost like a light on the hill, a promised land to the rest of the world.

    That promised land has been stoled.

    It is your responsibility to get it back.
  • Jürgen Siemer
    commented 2024-11-22 20:18:02 +1100
    Emberson, assuming you are a US citizen, I would respond that you should ask your government first to pull US troops out of Syria, Iraq and Germany, just to name a few, to proof that your government respects the sovereignty of other nations.

    Then, we can discuss, if Russia had the legal right to attac Ukraine to protect Russian Ukrainians in the civil war that had begun there in 2014 and that was to a significant extent caused by US interference.

    Do you remember “fuck the EU”-Nuland, former Nudelman?
  • James Hicks
    commented 2024-11-22 18:27:31 +1100
    October 25 2024 quote posted on fb from an Aussie: “Trump is going to win with a margin much higher…”. Apparently a bunch of pundits predicted the result so where were the Washington Strategists? Just to prove it, here’s the fb post:
    https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EeTj5Qjsi/?mibextid=WC7FNe
  • Emberson Fedders
    commented 2024-11-22 18:22:22 +1100
    Jurgen, you are weirdly pro-Russian. They invade a sovereign nation, yet we’re scolding Ukraine for retaliating?
  • Steven Meyer
    commented 2024-11-22 18:05:08 +1100
    David Page

    Yep, we are security bums. Although that is changing. Military spending is growing. The present government wants a domestic capability to build munitions such as anti-ship missiles at scale.

    But it’s not enough. We should join GCAP
  • Jürgen Siemer
    commented 2024-11-22 17:38:21 +1100
    David and Steven,

    I am again wondering how you can live in your liberal bubble wonderland without taking into account the facts.

    Latest example: the missile-attacs on Russia proper and the Russian response.

    Biden has said several times that he would not allow American participation in the war in Ukraine due to the risk of provoking a world war,

    The Atacms and Stormshadowd need satellite provided target data and people who can program the target systems in these missiles. The Russians have claimed several times that the Ukrainians do not have these capabilities. Hence, the Russians would Interpret an attac by Atacms or Stormshadows on Russia as a direct participation of those parties who have and provide the required capabilities and the missiles.

    They have a point, obviously.

    Yet you imperialists always claim that Russia is bluffing.

    Why do Blinken and his friends (I think Biden does not know what is happening anymore) do this a few days before they leave office???

    Now, the American/British strikes on Russia happened and the Russians responded, they had to.

    But the Russians responded in a restricted, very limited way, just showing what their new hypersonic missiles can do on an industrial area of the Ukrainian city of Dnipro.

    Thank God, Putin is not the mad man, you guys always claim him to be.

    The mad are in Washington and London. Will they strike again on Russia? Clearly possible. Would Russia respond? Definitely.

    But next time the Russians might show, that their hypersonics cannot be stopped by air defense, on a UK military base in Scotland, or some other nice place, say in Alaska.

    But the “we love the bomb” madmen Blinken and his friends do not care, apparently. He, who is a billionaire, does not care about the deaths of some goyim. He will be soon on his yacht and watch from the distance how things evolve.

    Shame on you all!
  • David Page
    commented 2024-11-22 12:57:52 +1100
    Steven, Australia is also a security bum. They are quite incapable of defending themselves. If you remember, Guadal Canal was fought to defend Australia. It was counter to the original “Europe first” plan.
  • Steven Meyer
    commented 2024-11-22 12:27:22 +1100
    David Page, I tend to agree. So Ukraine is toast.

    But what about Taiwan? That’s where I see the danger of war by miscalculation. Xi may be the one dictator Trump won’t give his way.

    I’ve often wondered whether Trump will try a “reverse Nixon.”

    Nixon and Kissinger broke up the Soviet-Chinese alliance.

    Could Trump try to bring Putin in from the cold? I don’t think most Russians like the idea of being China’s junior partner. If Trump succeeded there it would be a foreign policy coup.

    There’s one thing where I do agree with Trump. The Europeans were allowed to be security bums for too long. Germany, Poland and the Baltic States on their own could field a military that would crush the Russians. But, to make it credible, they’d need their own nuclear deterrent.

    Germany, unfortunately, is in danger of become a basket case. They have the world’s absolutely best, most amazing 20th century industrial ecosystem.

    Unfortunately we’re nearly a quarter way through the 21st century. But it’s not too late for them to catch up, They have an excellent STEM labour force and have proved surprisingly good at absorbing immigrants.
  • David Page
    commented 2024-11-22 11:33:03 +1100
    Steven, I agree. That’s why they were chosen. But Trump won’t go to war. He will give dictators whatever they want. Just like last time.
  • Steven Meyer
    commented 2024-11-22 11:16:26 +1100
    David Page

    Imagine there’s a real crisis, one that could result in war. The people making the decisions are Trump, Hesgeth and Gabbard. Which of the latter two would challenge Trump?
  • David Page
    commented 2024-11-22 11:02:25 +1100
    As Hannah Arendt points out, Totalitarians invariably replace talented people with crackpots and fools whose lack of intelligence or creativity is the best guarantee of their loyalty.
  • David Page
    commented 2024-11-22 10:51:29 +1100
    It is not surprising that many hippies are now Trumpsters. These are people who exist on the fringes.
  • David Page
    commented 2024-11-22 10:48:17 +1100
    Gaetz was threatened with the release of the House investigation of his dalliance (rape) of underage girls. That’s why he bailed.
  • Steven Meyer
    commented 2024-11-22 09:33:53 +1100
    mrscracker,

    I follow Tom Holland’s podcast. He’s most insightful.

    I guess one sign that you’re getting old is when stuff you read about in newspapers or The Economist Magazine, becomes the material for a history podcast. :)

    And the 1968 election was also not, for me at least, the culmination of the 1960s.

    Gaetz is out. Whether the rest are yes men we shall see.

    I actually have more faith in the reslience of the United States than most Americans seem to have. I’m pretty sure you’ll get over Trump Time and your children will say, “You elected who???”

    But, my word, you guys are good at inventing bogeymen.
  • mrscracker
    And I apologize, I was meaning to reply to your comments, Mr. Steven. Please forgive my bad manners for not making that clear.
    I hope you are enjoying a lovely day, evening, or night?
    :)
  • mrscracker
    I think Trump’s cabinet picks are unconventional. I would never consider them “Yes Men.” But I don’t know each one personally. I do know someone who’s been offered a role in a Federal dept. There’s no Yes Man about them whatsoever. I have family who are good friends with a political leader Mr. Trump will be working with. They’re legit, too. The rest of Mr. Trump’s crew I don’t know as much about, but Elon Musk is a reason my son has employment today so I’m grateful to him & wish him continued success.
    I’ve been listening to Tom Holland’s “The Rest is History” podcasts on YouTube. One recent series was on the US election of 1968. I really recommend it. I thought I knew about that election & the events leading up to it but there was a great deal more they covered in the podcast that I was unaware of. Especially about Eugene McCarthy who ran against LBJ.
  • Steven Meyer
    commented 2024-11-22 07:25:17 +1100
    mrscracker, I’ve never known anything good to come out of a leader who surrounds himself with yes men. The most infamous yes man team of the twentieth century was undoubtedly McNamara and his yes man, Westmoreland. But, we shall see what we shall see.

    As for Abbie Hoffman – I’d never heard of Trump at the time but to me Hoffman and Trump are of the same breed – narcissistic jerks.

    So, come to think of it, Trump rallies are the oldies’ version of Woodstock. Wouldn’t surprise me if some of the same fools who were at Woodstock are now avid Trumpies.

    People talk about “the sixties.” Well, you know what for me was the culmination of the sixties? Hint: It wasn’t “flower power” or dope. It wasn’t running riot at some stupid political convention. It wasn’t even that silly unwinnable war you Americans, for reasons I’ve never been able to fathom, were fighting in Vietnam.
  • mrscracker
    Well, there you go. One’s already out of consideration. On to the next nominee…
  • Jürgen Siemer
    commented 2024-11-22 04:18:14 +1100
    The nightmare team can become the dream team if they turn the US into the country it once was, before the dangerous imperialists stole it from the US citizens.
  • Jürgen Siemer
    commented 2024-11-22 04:07:57 +1100
    To some extent the US has become the economic parasite of the world, drawing products, the output of hard work, from other countries and paying with funny green paper, and thereby destroying the real savings of the world.

    The US has become a threat to peace, provoking wars, and sending weapons to genocidal regimes.

    I hope Trump is going to focus first on peace, immediately stopping sending money and weapons to Israel and Ukraine, then closing all US bases in foreign countries and, and this is important, closing the CIA and other spy agencies and firing all people working there.

    Then he shut cut the military budget in half and instead increase investments in the infrastructure at home.

    The result, after a transitionary period, would be reduced deficits, probably a budget surplus, and a real economic boom with a new prosperity based on honest work of proud people.
  • Fabio Carpenedo
    commented 2024-11-22 03:59:02 +1100
    Jesus didn’t shape the church. The Spirit did. I don’t think Trump as a kind of It.